Impulses
Forum Pro
exFAT is still widely used for SSD and removable media and it's the replacement for FAT32/16/etc. There's still a file allocation table regardless of which specific system is used. This hasn't stopped being a thing, so to speak, what did change ifms the way flash media handle stuff vs HDDs... It's not necessarily all written continuously for a variety of reasons, but deleting stuff randomly can still upset the media for similar reasons as it would a HDD.I’m no expert, but isn’t FAT (file allocation table) a bit last century and from the world of windows and spinning drives?Quick format only deletes the file allocation table (FAT) at the start of the sd-card. Explained in a somewhat simplified way: if your card is nearly full, new files that don’t fit in one sequence due to their size are written in-between other files, the FAT tells the OS of the camera or computer, where they are to find to put them back together. This is the reason full storage devices like sd-cards, hard disks and ssds get slower. The fat is like a table of contents at the beginning of a book. This is the reason files can be restored on quick formatted disks or disks with a damaged FAT file. Most of the files are written in sequence, only there is no FAT that knows their location, like a book where the table of contents at the start is removed. If you delete a file, only the entry in the table of contents will be deleted, so that the OS can write on this location again if necessary. This leads to a slower speed on a disk often used, because now there are empty spaces in between other files that get filled, so if you take new pictures now, 1 is written at the start, 2 is written at the end, 3 in between the middle and the end. Some devices have intelligence that reorganises the memory, so that the files are written in sequence again and put together as long as there is enough space. It’s a long time ago, that I studied this.Ok.No, not if doing a quick format (which in-camera formatting always is). It basically just overwrites the file system index with a blank one. That's why images can often be recovered even from "formatted" media.Wouldn't reformatting each time greatly increase the wear and tear on the SD ccard and so reduce its lifetime?
But perhaps then it might be helkpful too once in a blue moon make the SD card completely blank by doing a computer format?
Always keen to learn more about such things
It really shouldn't make a big difference whether you quick format the card (in camera or otherwise) or whether you grab all the comments in a file manager and delete them, the thread seems to be getting bogged down in that... What you don't wanna do is frequently delete stuff at random but leave others behind. Copying back a camera setting backup file after formatting or emptying a card is no big deal.
It's not entirely clear to me what else OP is trying to copy back to his card after every time he empties it...


