Understanding Diffraction: Why It Matters for Photographers

aChanceEncounter

Senior Member
Messages
1,318
Reaction score
1,277
Location
TX, US
Been fine tuning this brief article with ChatGPT over the last couple days to include questions and perspectives I have wondered about regarding diffraction. Interested in your thoughts?

When you stop down a lens to achieve more depth of field, you’re also introducing a fundamental optical effect called diffraction. This is not a flaw in your lens – it’s a property of light itself.

📷 What is Diffraction?

Diffraction happens when light waves bend as they pass through a small aperture. The smaller the opening (higher f‑stop), the more light spreads out, creating a larger blur circle called the Airy disk. Even the sharpest lens can’t overcome this – it’s basic physics.

🔍 How Sensor Pixel Size Comes Into Play

The smaller the pixel pitch (distance between pixels), the more that diffraction blur affects the image. High‑resolution sensors with tiny pixels will show diffraction softening earlier than lower‑resolution sensors.

Pixel pitch and diffraction thresholds for Fujifilm X‑series bodies:

Camera ModelResolutionPixel Pitch (approx.)

Diffraction Noticeable

X‑T5 / X‑H240 MP~3.03 µmf/5.6–f/8

X‑T4 / X‑T3 / X‑H2S26 MP~3.74 µmf/8–f/11

X‑T2 24 MP~3.92 µmf/8–f/11

X‑T116 MP~4.76 µmf/11–f/13

Cameras with larger pixels (like the X‑T1) can be stopped down further before diffraction visibly softens fine detail. Higher‑resolution models like the X‑T5 produce more detail overall but reveal diffraction earlier.

🎯 The DOF vs. Diffraction Trade‑Off

Stopping down increases depth of field, which brings more of the scene into focus. But the trade‑off is reduced fine detail from diffraction blur. For critical landscape work, many photographers aim for a sweet spot aperture (f/4–f/8 on high‑MP APS‑C) where sharpness and DOF balance out. For extreme DOF without diffraction softening, focus stacking is the best solution.

🔬 Do Primes Control Diffraction Better Than Zooms?

Diffraction is caused by physics and is not dependent on lens type. A prime lens cannot delay when diffraction begins. However, primes often have higher optical quality and start out sharper than zooms. Because of this, images from primes can look crisper at small apertures even though the diffraction effect is exactly the same. Zoom lenses, especially variable‑aperture designs, may already be a bit softer, so diffraction’s impact can seem more noticeable.

🖥️ Screen vs. Print – Why It Looks Different

When you view images at 100% on a high‑resolution monitor, any loss of micro‑contrast from diffraction is obvious. But prints are seen at lower resolution (usually 200–300 dpi) and at greater viewing distances. As a result:
  • Mild diffraction at f/8–f/11 is rarely visible in print, even at large sizes.
  • The “softness” you see when zoomed in disappears when the image is downsampled for printing.
Good post‑processing (sharpening, contrast adjustments, and noise reduction) can further compensate for the effects of diffraction. With careful editing, even images shot at f/11 or f/13 can look excellent in print, especially when viewed at normal distances.

✅ Takeaways for Photographers
  • Diffraction is unavoidable – it’s a law of physics.
  • Cameras with larger pixels (X‑T1, X‑T2) are more forgiving at small apertures.
  • High‑resolution cameras like X‑T5 reveal diffraction earlier but provide more detail overall.
  • Use f/4–f/8 for maximum sharpness on high‑MP APS‑C sensors.
  • With proper post‑processing, f/11 or even f/13 shots can still produce sharp, detailed prints.
  • Primes don’t change diffraction physics, but because they are usually sharper, they can still produce better small‑aperture images than zooms.
  • For large DOF without losing detail, consider focus stacking when possible.
  • Don’t panic about mild diffraction – prints hide it much better than screens.
Personal thought: Maybe I should break out my XT1 more often and try with the newer lenses?
 
I am always careful with language models providing technical information (as of today) but I think, yes, your text is largely correct.

Just don't agree with your personal conclusion. You will not lose more with the higher MPx cameras.

Here is a good read on diffraction. It is in German but translation should not be a problem. https://www.foto-schuhmacher.de/artikel/beugung.html#start

Best,

Martin

--
SmugMug - https://martinlang.smugmug.com
500px - https://500px.com/martinlangphotography
Insta - https://www.instagram.com/martininframes
Co-author on https://frickelfarm.de/
 
Last edited:
It should made clear that while the effects of diffraction may limit maximum resolution at wider apertures sooner with a 40MP sensor than a lower resolution sensor. The 40MP sensor will never be softer than a lower resolution sensor from the effects of diffraction at any aperture - f/5.6 will look better at 40MP, and f22 will look the same degree of crappy with both sensors …though with more image data and fewer interpolation errors at 40MP, whatever detail survives the diffraction at f/22 will still typically look better at 40MP and will also benefit more from A.I. RAW demosaicing and NR at any aperture.
 
One suggestion I'll make is to distinguish between the diffraction seen when pixel peeping at 100% or greater and when the photo is viewed at screen or print resultion. At screen resolution, which is how photos are consumed by the vast majority of folks, diffraction in an APS-C photo will probably not be an issue until very small aperture diameters (f/11 or greater) are in use. It's only when pixel peeping that diffraction might become discernible in photos made with larger apertures corresponding with f/8 or lower f-stops.

--
Bill Ferris Photography
https://billferrisphotography.pixieset.com/arizonaslittleserengeti/
 
Last edited:
From the text ...

"For critical landscape work, many photographers aim for a sweet spot aperture (f/4–f/8 on high‑MP APS‑C) where sharpness and DOF balance out."

If you ask over at the Landscape forum I believe you will find apertures of f/8 to f/12 are much more commonly used. Sometimes f/16 is appropriate.
 
Last edited:
From the text ...

"For critical landscape work, many photographers aim for a sweet spot aperture (f/4–f/8 on high‑MP APS‑C) where sharpness and DOF balance out."

If you ask over at the Landscape forum I believe you will find apertures of f/8 to f/12 are much more commonly used. Sometimes f/16 is appropriate.
Interesting I would think landscapes would avoid diffraction
 
From the text ...

"For critical landscape work, many photographers aim for a sweet spot aperture (f/4–f/8 on high‑MP APS‑C) where sharpness and DOF balance out."

If you ask over at the Landscape forum I believe you will find apertures of f/8 to f/12 are much more commonly used. Sometimes f/16 is appropriate.
It depends on the focal length I’m using, but I rarely see any good reason to go much beyond f/9 or f/10 with APS-C for most landscapes. Careful focusing at wider apertures does deliver better results if you can manage the necessary DOF.
 
From the text ...

"For critical landscape work, many photographers aim for a sweet spot aperture (f/4–f/8 on high‑MP APS‑C) where sharpness and DOF balance out."

If you ask over at the Landscape forum I believe you will find apertures of f/8 to f/12 are much more commonly used. Sometimes f/16 is appropriate.
What I have noticed is with higher MP bodies the more I will stop down.

Back when lens rental started getting D800 they tested them against cameras with less MP and what was found is that at ƒ11 it was still sharper than most lower MP camera bodies at their peak ƒ stop

So, I have no problem with ƒ16 when needed.
 
📷 What is Diffraction?

Diffraction happens when light waves bend as they pass through a small aperture.
They do not really "bend" light waves but I guess this is a good enough layman's explanation.
🔍 How Sensor Pixel Size Comes Into Play

The smaller the pixel pitch (distance between pixels), the more that diffraction blur affects the image. High‑resolution sensors with tiny pixels will show diffraction softening earlier than lower‑resolution sensors.

Pixel pitch and diffraction thresholds for Fujifilm X‑series bodies:

Camera ModelResolutionPixel Pitch (approx.)

Diffraction Noticeable

X‑T5 / X‑H240 MP~3.03 µmf/5.6–f/8

X‑T4 / X‑T3 / X‑H2S26 MP~3.74 µmf/8–f/11

X‑T2 24 MP~3.92 µmf/8–f/11

X‑T116 MP~4.76 µmf/11–f/13

Cameras with larger pixels (like the X‑T1) can be stopped down further before diffraction visibly softens fine detail. Higher‑resolution models like the X‑T5 produce more detail overall but reveal diffraction earlier.
Most of this is fundamentally wrong, and what can be salvaged, needs to be formulated properly.
 
📷 What is Diffraction?

Diffraction happens when light waves bend as they pass through a small aperture.
They do not really "bend" light waves but I guess this is a good enough layman's explanation.
🔍 How Sensor Pixel Size Comes Into Play

The smaller the pixel pitch (distance between pixels), the more that diffraction blur affects the image. High‑resolution sensors with tiny pixels will show diffraction softening earlier than lower‑resolution sensors.

Pixel pitch and diffraction thresholds for Fujifilm X‑series bodies:

Camera ModelResolutionPixel Pitch (approx.)

Diffraction Noticeable

X‑T5 / X‑H240 MP~3.03 µmf/5.6–f/8

X‑T4 / X‑T3 / X‑H2S26 MP~3.74 µmf/8–f/11

X‑T2 24 MP~3.92 µmf/8–f/11

X‑T116 MP~4.76 µmf/11–f/13

Cameras with larger pixels (like the X‑T1) can be stopped down further before diffraction visibly softens fine detail. Higher‑resolution models like the X‑T5 produce more detail overall but reveal diffraction earlier.
Most of this is fundamentally wrong, and what can be salvaged, needs to be formulated properly.
Is the concept right that pixel size impacts diffraction?
 
📷 What is Diffraction?

Diffraction happens when light waves bend as they pass through a small aperture.
They do not really "bend" light waves but I guess this is a good enough layman's explanation.
🔍 How Sensor Pixel Size Comes Into Play

The smaller the pixel pitch (distance between pixels), the more that diffraction blur affects the image. High‑resolution sensors with tiny pixels will show diffraction softening earlier than lower‑resolution sensors.

Pixel pitch and diffraction thresholds for Fujifilm X‑series bodies:

Camera ModelResolutionPixel Pitch (approx.)

Diffraction Noticeable

X‑T5 / X‑H240 MP~3.03 µmf/5.6–f/8

X‑T4 / X‑T3 / X‑H2S26 MP~3.74 µmf/8–f/11

X‑T2 24 MP~3.92 µmf/8–f/11

X‑T116 MP~4.76 µmf/11–f/13

Cameras with larger pixels (like the X‑T1) can be stopped down further before diffraction visibly softens fine detail. Higher‑resolution models like the X‑T5 produce more detail overall but reveal diffraction earlier.
Most of this is fundamentally wrong, and what can be salvaged, needs to be formulated properly.
Is the concept right that pixel size impacts diffraction?
Pixel size/density does not impact diffraction, but the effects of diffraction can limit the ultimate resolution potential as pixel density is increased …but not limited to any degree greater than the resolution of a sensor with larger less densely packed pixels (of the same size).
 
Last edited:
📷 What is Diffraction?

Diffraction happens when light waves bend as they pass through a small aperture.
They do not really "bend" light waves but I guess this is a good enough layman's explanation.
🔍 How Sensor Pixel Size Comes Into Play

The smaller the pixel pitch (distance between pixels), the more that diffraction blur affects the image. High‑resolution sensors with tiny pixels will show diffraction softening earlier than lower‑resolution sensors.

Pixel pitch and diffraction thresholds for Fujifilm X‑series bodies:

Camera ModelResolutionPixel Pitch (approx.)

Diffraction Noticeable

X‑T5 / X‑H240 MP~3.03 µmf/5.6–f/8

X‑T4 / X‑T3 / X‑H2S26 MP~3.74 µmf/8–f/11

X‑T2 24 MP~3.92 µmf/8–f/11

X‑T116 MP~4.76 µmf/11–f/13

Cameras with larger pixels (like the X‑T1) can be stopped down further before diffraction visibly softens fine detail. Higher‑resolution models like the X‑T5 produce more detail overall but reveal diffraction earlier.
Most of this is fundamentally wrong, and what can be salvaged, needs to be formulated properly.
Is the concept right that pixel size impacts diffraction?
Pixel size does impact diffraction. However, if cameras of the same format but different resolutions are used with the same lens, focal length, and settings to photograph the same subject in the same light, the higher resolution sensor (smaller pixels) will produce an image with more detail.

This "Photography Life" article from 2020 explains diffraction for the layperson petty well. If JACS or others who have a deeper understanding of the subject see any glaring errors/omissions, hopefully they'll chime in.

 
📷 What is Diffraction?

Diffraction happens when light waves bend as they pass through a small aperture.
They do not really "bend" light waves but I guess this is a good enough layman's explanation.
🔍 How Sensor Pixel Size Comes Into Play

The smaller the pixel pitch (distance between pixels), the more that diffraction blur affects the image. High‑resolution sensors with tiny pixels will show diffraction softening earlier than lower‑resolution sensors.

Pixel pitch and diffraction thresholds for Fujifilm X‑series bodies:

Camera ModelResolutionPixel Pitch (approx.)

Diffraction Noticeable

X‑T5 / X‑H240 MP~3.03 µmf/5.6–f/8

X‑T4 / X‑T3 / X‑H2S26 MP~3.74 µmf/8–f/11

X‑T2 24 MP~3.92 µmf/8–f/11

X‑T116 MP~4.76 µmf/11–f/13

Cameras with larger pixels (like the X‑T1) can be stopped down further before diffraction visibly softens fine detail. Higher‑resolution models like the X‑T5 produce more detail overall but reveal diffraction earlier.
Most of this is fundamentally wrong, and what can be salvaged, needs to be formulated properly.
Why did you ignore this part of pure nonsense?

"

🖥️ Screen vs. Print – Why It Looks Different

When you view images at 100% on a high‑resolution monitor, any loss of micro‑contrast from diffraction is obvious. But prints are seen at lower resolution (usually 200–300 dpi) and at greater viewing distances. As a result:
  • Mild diffraction at f/8–f/11 is rarely visible in print, even at large sizes.
  • The “softness” you see when zoomed in disappears when the image is downsampled for printing.
"

My printer's best resolution is 1440x2880 dpi. That's my preferred print resolution. I'm making my pictures to print to 180ppi, 360pp or 720ppi depending of the print size.

My monitor's resolution is 96 dpi. Why are my prints in lower resolution than my monitor?

Very seldom I have downsampled my pictures for printing. But, yes sometimes when I printed very small prints, I did.
 
From the text ...

"For critical landscape work, many photographers aim for a sweet spot aperture (f/4–f/8 on high‑MP APS‑C) where sharpness and DOF balance out."

If you ask over at the Landscape forum I believe you will find apertures of f/8 to f/12 are much more commonly used. Sometimes f/16 is appropriate.
My most often used aperture in my landscape pictures is f/11. Sometimes I use f/8 if I want very thin DOF. More often f/16 or f/22 have been used. F/16 is usually very acceptable, and if I need f/22 I'll use it. Still sharp enough in many cases and there's a reason if I do.
 
"Pixel size does impact diffraction."

The picture in the article you cited shows the exact opposite of your claim

The diffracted spot size got larger when the lens was stopped down. The grid of pixels stayed the same.

The article was more carefully worded to say the visibility of the effects of diffraction are affected by pixel size.
 
"Pixel size does impact diffraction."

The picture in the article you cited shows the exact opposite of your claim

The diffracted spot size got larger when the lens was stopped down. The grid of pixels stayed the same.

The article was more carefully worded to say the visibility of the effects of diffraction are affected by pixel size.
Thanks for saving me the trouble of typing the same thing. Diffraction is what is, it’s effects will manifest differently with sensors of differing pixel density.
 
📷 What is Diffraction?

Diffraction happens when light waves bend as they pass through a small aperture.
They do not really "bend" light waves but I guess this is a good enough layman's explanation.
🔍 How Sensor Pixel Size Comes Into Play

The smaller the pixel pitch (distance between pixels), the more that diffraction blur affects the image. High‑resolution sensors with tiny pixels will show diffraction softening earlier than lower‑resolution sensors.

Pixel pitch and diffraction thresholds for Fujifilm X‑series bodies:

Camera ModelResolutionPixel Pitch (approx.)

Diffraction Noticeable

X‑T5 / X‑H240 MP~3.03 µmf/5.6–f/8

X‑T4 / X‑T3 / X‑H2S26 MP~3.74 µmf/8–f/11

X‑T2 24 MP~3.92 µmf/8–f/11

X‑T116 MP~4.76 µmf/11–f/13

Cameras with larger pixels (like the X‑T1) can be stopped down further before diffraction visibly softens fine detail. Higher‑resolution models like the X‑T5 produce more detail overall but reveal diffraction earlier.
Most of this is fundamentally wrong, and what can be salvaged, needs to be formulated properly.
Is the concept right that pixel size impacts diffraction?
No, diffraction happens on the way to the pixels. To be more precise, diffraction, roughly speaking, is what cannot be explained with rays, but it can be explained with waves. An image projected on a film, or on a sheet of paper, for example, would have the same diffraction effect.

Pixels size affects what has been recorded. A finer pixel size resolves better everything: fine detail, motion blur, CA, diffraction, etc. The image is not softer with smaller pixels (well, it can be if the big pixels create strong aliasing which we may perceive as sharpness but they are artifacts). The misconception is created by the ease with which we pixel peep. At any reference size, smaller pixels create better images, lower aliasing and higher resolution, in general. Nobody complained in the past that finer grain films are softer.
 
Is the concept right that pixel size impacts diffraction?
Pixel size has no effect on lens diffraction. Lens diffraction is an analog phenomenon that would happen on a piece of micro-smooth paper put in place of the sensor. Pixel size just divides the full analog image into pixelated bins.

There are illusions of quality with big pixels, though, which can make it seem that bigger pixels on the same size sensor show less diffraction, as well as less camera shake, and they can also make it seem that AF is more accurate than it really is.
 
📷 What is Diffraction?

Diffraction happens when light waves bend as they pass through a small aperture.
They do not really "bend" light waves but I guess this is a good enough layman's explanation.
🔍 How Sensor Pixel Size Comes Into Play

The smaller the pixel pitch (distance between pixels), the more that diffraction blur affects the image. High‑resolution sensors with tiny pixels will show diffraction softening earlier than lower‑resolution sensors.

Pixel pitch and diffraction thresholds for Fujifilm X‑series bodies:

Camera ModelResolutionPixel Pitch (approx.)

Diffraction Noticeable

X‑T5 / X‑H240 MP~3.03 µmf/5.6–f/8

X‑T4 / X‑T3 / X‑H2S26 MP~3.74 µmf/8–f/11

X‑T2 24 MP~3.92 µmf/8–f/11

X‑T116 MP~4.76 µmf/11–f/13

Cameras with larger pixels (like the X‑T1) can be stopped down further before diffraction visibly softens fine detail. Higher‑resolution models like the X‑T5 produce more detail overall but reveal diffraction earlier.
Most of this is fundamentally wrong, and what can be salvaged, needs to be formulated properly.
Is the concept right that pixel size impacts diffraction?
If you have weighing scales which can display weight in stones, kilos, pounds, ounces or grams, does this setting on the scales impact how much you weigh?

No, but it might affect how paranoid you feel about your weight.

The same data binned in a different way can allow for a more precise measurement.
 
Last edited:

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top