Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
--NICE!!!
Is the Pigeon shot hand held? , if so it looks like I might have
to get the VR sooner than planned
,Jason
--
Gallery - http://www.digitalphotos.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk
All are with the D100 , details below.Jason - what camera are you using?
All are with the D100 , details below.Jason - what camera are you using?
Picture 1 (Moorhen)
ExposureTime : 1/320Sec
FNumber : F6.3
ExposureBiasValue : EV-0.7
MeteringMode : CenterWeightedAverage
FocalLength : 500.00(mm)
ISO Setting : 400
WhiteBalance : CLOUDY
ColorSpace : MODE1
Picture 2 (Seagull)
ExposureTime : 1/1000Sec
FNumber : F6.3
ExposureBiasValue : EV-0.7
MeteringMode : CenterWeightedAverage
FocalLength : 270.00(mm)
ISO Setting : 200
WhiteBalance : CLOUDY
WhiteBalanceBiasValue : +1
ColorSpace : MODE1
Picture 3 (Tit)
ExposureTime : 1/1500Sec
FNumber : F6.3
ExposureBiasValue : EV-0.7
MeteringMode : Spot
FocalLength : 500.00(mm)
ISO Setting : 400
WhiteBalance : CLOUDY
WhiteBalanceBiasValue : 0
ColorSpace : MODE1
--
Gallery - http://www.digitalphotos.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk
Brent,
I would definately go for the 80-400 VR (and did). But, if you
are planning to use this lens inside the studio, the minimum
focusing distance of 7.5' may make the 80-400 too tight and,
therefore, the 80-200 a much better choice with its minimum
focusing distance of 6'.
The VR feature is terrific on the 80-400 and easily compensates for
the slower f4-5.6 v. 2.8. The wider 2x range of the 80-400 means
less camera re-positioning and more flexibility for composition on
long/tight shots...a big advantage.
Either lens will be a great investment...buy both!
Best,
Don
- Bummer
Brent,
I would definately go for the 80-400 VR (and did). But, if you
are planning to use this lens inside the studio, the minimum
focusing distance of 7.5' may make the 80-400 too tight and,
therefore, the 80-200 a much better choice with its minimum
focusing distance of 6'.
The VR feature is terrific on the 80-400 and easily compensates for
the slower f4-5.6 v. 2.8. The wider 2x range of the 80-400 means
less camera re-positioning and more flexibility for composition on
long/tight shots...a big advantage.
Either lens will be a great investment...buy both!
Best,
Don
Ok I need to buy a really good zoom lens :
Here are the options:
80-400VR or the 80-200 AFS 2.8 ED IFS
Can somedoy post a link or picture to a shot that they have taken
with either of these or a Zoom that you think is the best thing you
own..
I need something to use for hi quality shots vs. my less that
perfect 24-120mm Nikkor
Thanks in advance
A simple extension tube will get your minimum focusing distance well,well inside 6 feet on the 80-400 VR, or the 80-200. If you're shooting with studio flash, any extension tube will do,as long as you do not need the VR function enabled.focusing distance of 7.5' may make the 80-400 too tight and,
therefore, the 80-200 a much better choice with its minimum
focusing distance of 6'.
Sorry, the 80-200 AFS lens and all were handheld.Jim - 80-200 AFS ED etc etc? Internal zoom?
Also were they handheld or tripof/monopod?
--Here are some 80-400 shots, all jpegs hand held w/D100.
http://www.imageevent.com/shattners/ourfloridapond
--
Jerry
--What is most important to you... 2.8 or the 400mm??
Like many, I have both lenses. Each for different type of assignments.