It may seem that way when described in those terms, but in reality I never had an issue with any of my Olympus cameras over the years I shot them. The sensor never got "misaligned." In fact, it was a useful feature.
Sure, Sony did that, and they very likely also hold the patents ;-) So, when Fuji says they can't do it without affecting image quality more than they are willing to accept, perhaps they mean they can't do it by not resorting to mechanisms that are under patent protection.
Or paying Sony to license said technology...
Thereby increasing the price of already pricey cameras!
I would not hold my breath. I think you need to look elsewhere. Fuji's current offering don't satisfy your needs.
www.flickr.com
Welcome to internet forums, Greg. If we banned every post that talked about the evils of Adobe, green mush, no in-body OIS, etc., there wouldn't be much left to read (OK, perhaps a slight exaggeration). Rehashing these topics is a fact of life here (and similar issues in almost any other forum out there) and the best bet for you and others that feel the same way is to ignore them, don't contribute to the discussion (and the length of the thread), and simply move on.
Welcome to internet forums, Greg. If we banned every post that talked about the evils of Adobe, green mush, no in-body OIS, etc., there wouldn't be much left to read (OK, perhaps a slight exaggeration). Rehashing these topics is a fact of life here (and similar issues in almost any other forum out there) and the best bet for you and others that feel the same way is to ignore them, don't contribute to the discussion (and the length of the thread), and simply move on.
Just because something has been worked and reworked here doesn't mean that there aren't nuggets of information that might prove useful, particularly to forum newbies. Posting a thread like this does not instantly make someone a troll, and the fact that it's from a newbie makes it likely that they might not have the long history of reading about this topic that longer term members like you and me have. Best to simply take a moment for a nice eye roll and just move on to the next post.
That would welcome newcomersEven better - can we have an emoticon for eye rolling - a big one!Welcome to internet forums, Greg. If we banned every post that talked about the evils of Adobe, green mush, no in-body OIS, etc., there wouldn't be much left to read (OK, perhaps a slight exaggeration). Rehashing these topics is a fact of life here (and similar issues in almost any other forum out there) and the best bet for you and others that feel the same way is to ignore them, don't contribute to the discussion (and the length of the thread), and simply move on.
Just because something has been worked and reworked here doesn't mean that there aren't nuggets of information that might prove useful, particularly to forum newbies. Posting a thread like this does not instantly make someone a troll, and the fact that it's from a newbie makes it likely that they might not have the long history of reading about this topic that longer term members like you and me have. Best to simply take a moment for a nice eye roll and just move on to the next post.
--
Jerry-Astro
Fujifilm X Forum Co-Mod
Vic
Welcome to internet forums, Greg. If we banned every post that talked about the evils of Adobe, green mush, no in-body OIS, etc., there wouldn't be much left to read (OK, perhaps a slight exaggeration). Rehashing these topics is a fact of life here (and similar issues in almost any other forum out there) and the best bet for you and others that feel the same way is to ignore them, don't contribute to the discussion (and the length of the thread), and simply move on.
Just because something has been worked and reworked here doesn't mean that there aren't nuggets of information that might prove useful, particularly to forum newbies. Posting a thread like this does not instantly make someone a troll, and the fact that it's from a newbie makes it likely that they might not have the long history of reading about this topic that longer term members like you and me have. Best to simply take a moment for a nice eye roll and just move on to the next post.
Thanks - I'll save it for special occasionsHow's this one? No charge for reusing it.
That gets my vote!
LOL. But consider how boring this place would be with only 5 remaining posts a day. OK, 10, but that's my last offer. :-DThat gets my vote!
I think I could simply copy and paste your post to reply to you and guess what, it would work perfectly !
Welcome to internet forums, Greg. If we banned every post that talked about the evils of Adobe, green mush, no in-body OIS, etc., there wouldn't be much left to read (OK, perhaps a slight exaggeration). Rehashing these topics is a fact of life here (and similar issues in almost any other forum out there) and the best bet for you and others that feel the same way is to ignore them, don't contribute to the discussion (and the length of the thread), and simply move on.
Just because something has been worked and reworked here doesn't mean that there aren't nuggets of information that might prove useful, particularly to forum newbies. Posting a thread like this does not instantly make someone a troll, and the fact that it's from a newbie makes it likely that they might not have the long history of reading about this topic that longer term members like you and me have. Best to simply take a moment for a nice eye roll and just move on to the next post.
