U
Ulysses
Guest
What's better is when you consistently stick to a chosen colorspace for your image capture, your editing, and for your output. It's not that the sRGB colorspace can't capture the reds that are being talked about here. It can do it.
It's not the camera.
As an example of how things can go wrong when mixing colorspaces or otherwise not processing them properly, have a look at the short writeup and samples here:
http://www.robgalbraith.com/ubbthreads/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=UBB8&Number=164136&page=0&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=&fpart=1
Certainly the AdobeRGB colorspace is great to use. But not necessarily because it's wider. For a majority of applications, however, sRGB is still going to get you the color that you want. If things seem somehow muted, it's probably because the above problem.
Ulysses
http://www.ulyssesphotography.com
It's not the camera.
As an example of how things can go wrong when mixing colorspaces or otherwise not processing them properly, have a look at the short writeup and samples here:
http://www.robgalbraith.com/ubbthreads/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=UBB8&Number=164136&page=0&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=&fpart=1
Certainly the AdobeRGB colorspace is great to use. But not necessarily because it's wider. For a majority of applications, however, sRGB is still going to get you the color that you want. If things seem somehow muted, it's probably because the above problem.
--Is it not better to go for Adobe as the color space ? I allways
thought that SRGB is a limited color space compared to adobe ?
Then again I may be talking pants !
Ulysses
http://www.ulyssesphotography.com