I just don't want it at all, i want to completely, totally, disable it, it's of no use to me. I agree with Daniella, if i had known it was so freakin sensitive i would have bought the 10d also, i'm in the same boat, can't sell it now and still get the 10d. I'll send it to canon for warranty work if they ask me to, but i'm sure they will simply say it is working properly, however poorly that may be. If they will disable the feature totally i will ship it tommorrow.If anyone here can do this workaround with a moving target...II don't think anyone is trying to "justify" Canon's actions. We
know they purposely crippled and sabotaged the 300D to prop up
their higher-end cameras. I don't think anyone is disagreeing with
you by saying that the camera is perfect.
Some people here have proposed some work-arounds though.
would like to know their technique to have enough speed to set all
this and not miss a shot.
It's
If I had known how bad it was working in these situations I wouldnot perfect, but I don't think Canon's going to fix the 300D when
they purposely crippled it to begin with. Since we've already
bought into the 300D, we can either choose to work with what we
have or buy a different camera.
have got the 10D for sure..now just don't want to loose money on
it. I am not that rich. But if nobody complains, there is no
chance that anythign will be taking care of. they could at least
fix the bahavior so that the evaluative meetering is not that
weighted. it is now too dependant on the focusing point and that
is a major flaw.
That work around should work well for static flower shot, orYou're right in saying that the work arounds aren't as good as
actually Canon fixing the focus, but I'm not holding my breath for
that to happen.
landscape. It is just not possible for me to do this when trying
to capture a flyign bird or a candid shot of a moving person.
Good thing the meetering is reliable in 95% of the case. I only
have problem with it with very contrasty objects.
For the AI servo..I have just simply gave up on it..but I do get
blurry shot because I forget to snap the picture right away and
have the tendency to pre-focus and wait for best moment. It is a
very hard habbit to get rid of.
--DaShiv
yeah right....it amaze me how people are tryign to justify this
camera crippling...
Canon is really a good judge of foolishness...they did the right
thing I think..only a fiew of use understand the catch.
--Atleast not for me and what i shoot, trying to flip that little(You have a very good eye
for photography, Daniella.
But when technical quest-
ions are discussed here,
you never seem not to list-
en properly. Why is that?)
--
db.
that's exactly what I meant. If I use the 7 points focus and the
camera pick up points that are spread, lets say one on the left and
one of the right, then I get evaluative meetering. If the camera
would pick up onle the point on the right, then I get partial.
But since I am using the manualy selected central focusing point, I
always get exposure that is strongly weithted toward the center. I
don't want to use 7 points focus...it does not focus where I want
it to be, but I would like to be able to get evaluative no matter
what focusing point I use.
My only work around so far is to pay attention to focus right on
the edge of dark/light areas. I must constantly pay attention to
where exactly I focus on a contrasty subject...a pain in the ass!
tiny, itty, bitty switch on the lens to manual focus and hold the
camera at the same point where you focus locked is not very ideal,
especially considering the rebels very limited depth of field.
Please understand that i don't want more options, i just want to
get rid of this one!
I am not an English native speaker!
http://www.pbase.com/zylen
http://www.photosig.com/go/users/userphotos?id=26918
I am not an English native speaker!
http://www.pbase.com/zylen
http://www.photosig.com/go/users/userphotos?id=26918