Answer from Nikon to III

As usual, I wasn't clear on what I meant, but you didn't read the follow up notes I wrote, or you are ignoring them.

I meant to mention those pros who are sitting on old equipment that may not be reliable for much longer and those who have been pressured by their clients- the editors of magazines, etc.- to get more pixels.

I will not get rid of my Nikon equipment anytime soon. It works just fine for what I do. And I will NEVER switch to Canon.

Apparently, there will soon be an announcement from Nikon this week on product. According to jeff-c. I hope they sneak a body announcement in there!!!
on a practical standpoint, that doesn't make any sense at all.
will their Nikon cameras suddenly stop working after MkIII ships
that they are compelled to switch? or perhaps the D2x/D2h will
output pictures of squirrels even if you're trying to shoot images
of Heidi Klum when the MkIII starts shipping?

Pros switch brands if they find that CURRENT equipment they have
does not meet their needs...NOT to look forward to something that's
in the HORIZON.

pssh.
By that time many Nikon pros will have been forced to switch by
their clients and or their agencies. If they are going to have a
fall releas,e they had better announce it before the MK III ships.
Once these pros sell all of their glass, they won't easily switch
back, no matter how BIG that announcement is.
I personally will wait, but I am only a semi-pro and I usually
shoot for a newspaper. i have enough resolution and low enough
noise now.

--
Chris, Broussard, LA
--
http://www.subtleimages.com/blog/
--
Chris, Broussard, LA
 
wow. many Nikon pros will be switching in the next 6 months?
really? where did you buy your crystal ball?

on a practical standpoint, that doesn't make any sense at all.
will their Nikon cameras suddenly stop working after MkIII ships
that they are compelled to switch? or perhaps the D2x/D2h will
output pictures of squirrels even if you're trying to shoot images
of Heidi Klum when the MkIII starts shipping?
Certainly a good point for sure. What bothers me is we hear of "pros" switching to Canon but never hear of "pros" switching to Nikon... I am sure this is happening but not at the rate of the "to Canon" switch. Just doing the math here will tell you that at some point either (past already) or just (about to be pasted), Nikon became a non player in the sports shooting arena.

I don't think anyone will argue that there are way more Canon setups at major sporting events then there are Nikons. This has to say something. We can all argue about the Nikon look, ergos, dependabiltiy, price point, great lenses and other things until we are blue in the face.. The bottom line is the pro market is no longer chosing Nikon as their first choice..

For me, and I have stated this already, since I don't shoot sports and mostly don't need low light performance. My D2Xs is the best there is for what I do.. Me switch.. Hell no.. for what? I'll pit my D2Xs against any dslr in the studio. None will prove they make a better looking image for what my output is..

If I somehow find a job that has me shooting low light sporting events I would be on the waiting list for the Mark III...or... Nikons newest "low light marvel" if that's in Nikon's plan for the future...
--
Subject and Composition Trumps Any Camera Flaws.
Frank Benvenuto
 
Have you guys been watching the total and complete transfirmation of the one time "I bleed for Nikon" Greg to Canon.. It's amazing to watch.. Look at this latest posts.. Now remind you.. Greg has been a Nikon dude for YEARS.. now he doesn't shoot his Nikons anymore...

It's really amazing to me.. and something that needs to be looked into.. Greg is a highly respected shooter here in DP land..

--
Subject and Composition Trumps Any Camera Flaws.
Frank Benvenuto
 
By that time many Nikon pros will have been forced to switch by
their clients and or their agencies. If they are going to have a
fall releas,e they had better announce it before the MK III ships.
Once these pros sell all of their glass, they won't easily switch
back, no matter how BIG that announcement is.
I personally will wait, but I am only a semi-pro and I usually
shoot for a newspaper. i have enough resolution and low enough
noise now.
Nah, every couple of years when Canon announces a significant upcoming release, the same sort of prognostications get made. Eventually Nikon also announces a significant new release and wouldn't you know it, most people never did switch brands, Nikon's new camera flies off of the shelves and the world goes on.

Personally the only thing I'm looking forward to right now is watching the 5D cheeleaders start howling about their noise issues once the APS MkIII hits the streets.

--
'Here, look at the monkey. Look at the silly monkey!'

Tom Young
http://www.pbase.com/tyoung/
 
I don't know why people have to be so sarcastic when new release
related information is shared.
This is gossip - not information. Nobody has a problem with facts.
The reason he might have shared it with this community is because:
  • Every one is anxiously waiting for Nikon's next release.
They always are. All the time. That doesn't make gossip more valuable.
  • He gained/ learnt a lot from you guys. And he wants to give it back.
Good. Give back facts not gossip and predictions. Nothing is learned by gossip, whether sarcastic or not.
  • To avoid others making impulsive decision & switch gears.
If you are making decisions on gossip and rumours, then you have larger problems than being impulsive.
If you don't agree, read & move on.
Or, post your opinion like everyone else. Why are you trying to silence those who have a different opinion on the value of rumours?
Why do you have to argue or fight.
Nobody's fighting. Obviously you fail to see the humour ...
You don't have to kill the messenger!
Nobody got killed ... and why do you think your message is more valuable than others? You can't pick and choose which messengers you don't want shot.

If there weren't so many rumour, gossip, psychic posts, then there wouldn't be so many dissenting posts.

--
'Let my heart be broken by the things that break the heart of God.'
===============
Nikon D200 - MB-D200 - SB800 - TC-20EII
Nikons(f/2.8 all) 17-55, 105VR Micro, 70-200 VR, 300
 
Using a flash is not allowed for most sporting events. Strobes in
the ceiling are allowed for some events, but trying to stobe a
baseball field would be funny as well as a football or soccer
field! Personally, I will say it again- I will wait for Nikon. I
have no problem with my D2H bodies performance. I am discussing
others, not me.
oh, yes, sporting events... right, as today 80% minimum of photographers use Canon gear to shoot.

Another example: come to Italy for the Milanovendemoda (fashion Fair) and you will see much more Nikons than Canons... In the fashion/glamour world of photography, where hi-ISO is not necessary Nikon rule.
I think there are more pages about fashion in magazines than about sports....
 
--
'Let my heart be broken by the things that break the heart of God.'
===============
Nikon D200 - MB-D200 - SB800 - TC-20EII
Nikons(f/2.8 all) 17-55, 105VR Micro, 70-200 VR, 300
 
I am happy that you are pleased with your new Canon gear. We've known each other a long time here, but I have to tell you that you seem to take jabs at Nikon at any chance you get. Are you angry with Nikon? It's gear, if Canon works better for you great, buy you have changed to the same type of canon person you hated to deal with when you shot nikon. It's become boring, but if thats what makes you feel better about changing, so be it.

Anyhow, I am happy you have found the gear you like.

--
Harris

PBase/DPReview/NTF supporter
Egret Stalker #4, WSSA #29

http://www.pbase.com/backdoctor
 
Yes and but for these reasons.... wouldn't most people have switched already? I am no longer buying Nikon products - after all the frustration and dissaapointment I have had to deal with for the last few years. I just hope when I have saved up enough to get a decent Canon body my lenses will be worth enough to get me the basics of what I need to shoot with from day to day.
I am not trying to make it sound like all pros will switch. Just
the ones who have been on the fence and those who need to replace
their almost worn out bodies.
it's a lot cheaper to add a new D2X to the old one and have two (or
three) of these instead of selling all (used) lenses and buy some
10,000-20,000 $ worth of stuff new, adding the difficulties of
working with a totally different camera that slow your work...
--
Peter Waldvogel

Nikon D80
Nikon D70
Nikkor 17-55mm f/2.8G ED-IF AF-S DX
Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8D G-AFS ED-IF VR
Nikkor 20mm f/2.8 D
Nikkor 50mm f/1.8 D
Nikkor 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5 (Kit Lens)
Nikon SB600
Sekonic L-508 Zoom Master
 
QFT!

also the real pro's shoot MF and don't piddle around with dslr's.
That quote is wrong. Depends on what you shoot. This Billboard I shot with a D2X. It looks a little flat because I didn't change it to sRGB for web. Client was very happy and I have worked with them many times on different adds since.



This image was shot with a Fuji S2. Again I have many images on the 2007 Jim Beam callendar.



Another image from the Fuji S2 for Old Spice.



This is my daughter with the 5D.



Call it what you want but making 30,000 dollars from 4 hours work dosn't qualify as Pro because I didn't use Medium Format. That image I can't show due to contract but was shot with a 5D.

Don't worry Nikon makes great camera's as well as Canon. They both make some great glass. Go out, take some shots and be happy we have so many options.

By the way I do shoot with medium format as well but it is to limited for many jobs.
--
http://www.pbase.com/jhp
 
I teased my Nikon guy friend about the June 1st (Canon III date),
and he told me that Nikon will have a BIG answer for that around
fall, and will be BIG.
to make a crop factor camera again, like the D2x: They need to do both things in one: high rez in 1,2 crop of FF, and high speed (8 or 10MP in crop mode). If they answer the 1d Mk3 with a similar camera, they will have nothing against the 1ds Mark III. I cannot imagine them to come out with 2 pro cameras at the same time.

Basically they are half a year late, because many Nikon people will give in to the seduction that is called MkIII and will ship soon.

If they will stick to Dx they will have a very hard time to increase the resolution anyway, because 12MP is already a bit too much for small sensors, I cannot imagine them going to 16Mp in a Dx sensor - the ISO performance would be horrible above ISO 400....

At least - one could say - they are not trapped into the small format like Oly who cannot go bigger.

Bernie
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top