robert1955
Veteran Member
- Messages
- 7,424
- Solutions
- 10
- Reaction score
- 4,964
I'd say Fuji realised the product segmentation in the X-H1 / X-T4 generation was messyIMO Fuji products manager splited X-Tx line into X-Tx, X-H2s & X-H2.Still the X-T line was a breaking point for Fuji, can’t believe they will mess it that much!Em...Canon EOS M (e.g. Canon M50, M6 Mark II) accounts for 30% of Canon’s sales but ....
https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/66193661
Toplevel in APSC ["flagship" in MF]: speed X-H2s [2500], resolution X-H2 [2000], PASMSince some consumer mentioned video feature make camera cost more, demand cheaper STILLS oriented camera, Fuji investor demand more profit margin.
IMO Alternative products segmentation:
- Flagship $2499 X-H2s - PASM 40fps for STILLS and 4K 120p for video
- Upper midrange $2199 X-H2 - PASM 40MP for STILLS (support vertical portrait via grip) and 8K 30p for 30 minutes video
- Lower midrange $1999 X-T5 - retro 40MP for STILLS and 8K 30p for 10 minutes short video clip
- Legacy retro midrange (26MP) with IBIS $1499 X-T4 WWW (without charger)
- $1099 X-T3 discontinued
- Entry-level $1,099 X-S20 (PASM with IBIS)
Upper mid X-T5, dials 40MP [1750] first half 2023, X-pro second half [1850]
Entry / lower mid level later, 2 or 3 models
Older models not discontinued while stock lasts
More importantly most users can find a model that suits their needs and what they are willing to pay, which means sales volumeIn above, retro STILLS oriented consider affordable tier under Fuji new line-up. Investor happy because increase profit margin.