Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That’s indeed interesting! I had a D7200 before this and never noticed it thereThat's interesting. I made a similar observation with my D500, but only in very rare cases:
Rolling (mechanical) shutter with D500?
I don't do bird photography. But I wondered if it was rolling shutter or a weird wing geometry from that viewpoint.


Thanks for the explanation, that's useful!The Auto setting is mechanical at your 1/2000 shutter speed.
The shutter choices:
Mechanical: the shutter closes. The sensor is reset for a new photo. The front curtain opens to start the exposure. The rear curtain follows, closing the sensor. At fast shutter speeds, it's making a slit traveling down the sensor.
Electronic shutter: The sensor resets and reads a few rows of sensor data at a time, traveling down the sensor. On the Z50 ii or the Z6 iii, this is a slower scan than the mechanical shutter, so there can be more "rolling shutter" artifacts.
Electronic front curtain EFCS: The mechanical shutter doesn't close to start the exposure. Instead, the sensor is reset. Now the rear curtain moves across the sensor. This avoids "shutter shock" vibrations from the front curtain closing just before the sensor is exposed. It's for lower shutter speeds.
Auto: The Z6 iii will use EFCS at 1/250 or slower. Mechanical at faster shutter speeds. I expect that the Z50 ii is similar.
~~~
I use Auto or Electronic.
That's a good point, it might be a result of an unusual angle. I have photographed a lot of birds, but never seen the wings look like this, but I haven't photographed terns much and they have a wing with sharp angles in use so it might be thatI don't do bird photography. But I wondered if it was rolling shutter or a weird wing geometry from that viewpoint.Hi, Bought a Z50 ii recently, felt that I got a little rolling shutter when using the Auto setting for shutter type so set it for Mechanical. Was out photographing some terns today and got massive distortion from what I assume is rolling shutter on several pictures. Is this to be expected?
A quick google image search for flying tern shows very few rear viewpoints. I suppose the front angle viewpoint makes a good composition, so those get chosen to edit. But maybe some rearward views get distorted looking wings?
~~~
for example
A rear side view (from this link)
That right wing is starting to look somewhat like your example photos? It's hard to see the compound bend in the wing here.
And this photo. Not exactly like your photos.
Thanks! It might be a mix here the, bird with sharp, thin wings from unusual angle and a bit rolling shutterThe Z50II (actually ALL Nikon's digitals) has a vertical travel focal plane shutter. The "scan" time for the shutter in the Z50II is the Flash Sync Speed. This is equal to 5 milliseconds and that can produce a rather mild rolling shutter effect.
I'm not sure everybody understands what "rolling shutter" is.

Yes, also spectacular on helicopters :A bird photographer from Japan (Twitter: momiji_man_10 ) also noticed that on 20 July 2025 and he said:
"Z50II silent mode so much distortion!"
He compared OM-III (with photos) and said:
"Those images taken with OM-III are electronic shutter too but they are not as distorted as Z50II, I guess the sensors made so much difference."
I am not using Z50II, I use Z5II and also notice the effect (distortion) especially when I am shooting with a 400mm telephoto lens, silent mode. Instead of birds I test my Z5II with Hong Kong buildings: occasionally the buildings are like "dancing" in the pictures.
More complicated in the Z50II case, not only moving parts distorted, anything don't move, distorted too, as shown:Yes, also spectacular on helicopters :A bird photographer from Japan (Twitter: momiji_man_10 ) also noticed that on 20 July 2025 and he said:
"Z50II silent mode so much distortion!"
He compared OM-III (with photos) and said:
"Those images taken with OM-III are electronic shutter too but they are not as distorted as Z50II, I guess the sensors made so much difference."
I am not using Z50II, I use Z5II and also notice the effect (distortion) especially when I am shooting with a 400mm telephoto lens, silent mode. Instead of birds I test my Z5II with Hong Kong buildings: occasionally the buildings are like "dancing" in the pictures.