ElhanDobriv
Leading Member
Then what’s this about?I don't do sport eventsSorry, am I distracting you from all those pro sports events you’ve been booked for?You must have nothing else to do if you are still here rantingLooks to me like your use case is based on your imagination.If you need a stacked sensor you just do is all but subjectiveThe part where he said:I don't understand your response.These are just subjective reasons to write it off from your imaginary use cases. Clearly you’ve done the same with the S1RII, that table is only useful for you. For others it’s just nonsense.The A7R V video is line skipped and the stabilisation is terribleThen whats the comparison table for? Total nonsense too btw, in what reality is an A7RV not capable of handheld video?am not buying an a7r v doesn’t add anything to what i haveBro. You have two Sony A1’s. You don’t need another camera. BTW, an A7RV can shoot low light video, and an S1RII can shoot wildlife.
if you call video pressing the video button it certainly does it
He has said throughout his first post that he was comparing his gear and his use cases against new choices. The idea was to see if anything serves him better than what he has. It is a useful exercise to do once in a while with new cameras becoming available.
I don't see where he said his analysis or recommendation was universal for everyone here.
To me how he analyzed, the factors he used, etc., was useful so anyone in a similar situation can figure out how to evaluate their choices.
I leave this here for others to consider against mainly the A7R V as clearly if you need a stacked sensor you just do and there is no match even with the S1R II
That table is highly subjective and not useful for others. Keep up lad.
the table are my use case based on my standards and my pockets
someone with no choices doesn’t need the table

