Something about Coloraccuracy

Dominic Groß

Veteran Member
Messages
7,181
Reaction score
3
Location
Kassel, DE
Both shoots are straight out of the Camera, just auto setting of Photo Pro used and Photoshop to convert to jpeg. No aadditional corrections. All the Colors (Skin Tones, (red) hair, bricks of the building) are accurate.





24-70mm/3.5-5.6, ISO 200, 1/250, f9.5
--
http://www.pbase.com/dgross
ICQ UIN: 289647506
 
Dominic,

The quality looks fabulous. We could argue about your hair color - how did you manage to get yourself in front of the camera? - but it would be tough to argue about how nice and smooth these images look. I'm sure others will find a way, but not me.

I would get a new hairdresser, however.

Laurence
Both shoots are straight out of the Camera, just auto setting of
Photo Pro used and Photoshop to convert to jpeg. No aadditional
corrections. All the Colors (Skin Tones, (red) hair, bricks of the
building) are accurate.

http://mitglied.lycos.de/domstestnews/Sigma/IMG00296.jpg
http://mitglied.lycos.de/domstestnews/Sigma/IMG00305.jpg

24-70mm/3.5-5.6, ISO 200, 1/250, f9.5
--
http://www.pbase.com/dgross
ICQ UIN: 289647506
--
Go Alinghi
Alinghi 1:0 New Zealand

http://www.pbase.com/lmatson/sd9_images
 
Both shoots are straight out of the Camera, just auto setting of
Photo Pro used and Photoshop to convert to jpeg. No aadditional
corrections. All the Colors (Skin Tones, (red) hair, bricks of the
building) are accurate.

http://mitglied.lycos.de/domstestnews/Sigma/IMG00296.jpg
http://mitglied.lycos.de/domstestnews/Sigma/IMG00305.jpg

24-70mm/3.5-5.6, ISO 200, 1/250, f9.5
Dominic,
Nice samples, and congrats with your new SD9!

Color accuracy is a relative issue, and it can be very difficult to judge. One thing's for sure though, the color balance is very good on most SD9 images. This color balance is "wide" and makes it possible to make a number of adjustments that will bring the colors to a more accurate level. For example, the skin tones on your original image was off by approx 10°, which is typical for the SD9 image.



Geir R
 
Given my weak color perception, it looks like you took a very slight yellow cast out or you cooled the image a little colorwise!
Both shoots are straight out of the Camera, just auto setting of
Photo Pro used and Photoshop to convert to jpeg. No aadditional
corrections. All the Colors (Skin Tones, (red) hair, bricks of the
building) are accurate.

http://mitglied.lycos.de/domstestnews/Sigma/IMG00296.jpg
http://mitglied.lycos.de/domstestnews/Sigma/IMG00305.jpg

24-70mm/3.5-5.6, ISO 200, 1/250, f9.5
Dominic,
Nice samples, and congrats with your new SD9!
Color accuracy is a relative issue, and it can be very difficult to
judge. One thing's for sure though, the color balance is very good
on most SD9 images. This color balance is "wide" and makes it
possible to make a number of adjustments that will bring the colors
to a more accurate level. For example, the skin tones on your
original image was off by approx 10°, which is typical for the SD9
image.



Geir R
--
http://www.lightreflection.com
http://www.silveroaksranch.com
http://www.pbase.com/rickdecker
 
Sorry Geir I have to correct you, the colors are off in your versions.

The hair is to red in your pic and the yellow cast on the skintones is alright in my version, the sun was quite low and everything looked yellow this day because of this yellow (unusal dark) sunlight that was nearly in my back while shooting this picture. The hair of the girl on the left is completly wrong your version. I tried your presets on some of my other indoor images and they have a red cast after aplying. Actually Red is a bit overdone in your presets. The other problem is that not all yellows need to be fixed, but by fixing all yellows of picture with the hue/saturation tool you change some yellows that are ok. The problem is that the icc profiles I made do a good job on this point but have the problem with green...
Both shoots are straight out of the Camera, just auto setting of
Photo Pro used and Photoshop to convert to jpeg. No aadditional
corrections. All the Colors (Skin Tones, (red) hair, bricks of the
building) are accurate.

http://mitglied.lycos.de/domstestnews/Sigma/IMG00296.jpg
http://mitglied.lycos.de/domstestnews/Sigma/IMG00305.jpg

24-70mm/3.5-5.6, ISO 200, 1/250, f9.5
Dominic,
Nice samples, and congrats with your new SD9!
Color accuracy is a relative issue, and it can be very difficult to
judge. One thing's for sure though, the color balance is very good
on most SD9 images. This color balance is "wide" and makes it
possible to make a number of adjustments that will bring the colors
to a more accurate level. For example, the skin tones on your
original image was off by approx 10°, which is typical for the SD9
image.



Geir R
--
http://www.pbase.com/dgross
ICQ UIN: 289647506
 
Sorry Geir I have to correct you, the colors are off in your versions.
The hair is to red in your pic and the yellow cast on the skintones
is alright in my version, the sun was quite low and everything
looked yellow this day because of this yellow (unusal dark)
sunlight that was nearly in my back while shooting this picture.
The hair of the girl on the left is completly wrong your version. I
tried your presets on some of my other indoor images and they have
a red cast after aplying. Actually Red is a bit overdone in your
presets. The other problem is that not all yellows need to be
fixed, but by fixing all yellows of picture with the hue/saturation
tool you change some yellows that are ok. The problem is that the
icc profiles I made do a good job on this point but have the
problem with green...
Ok Dominic, you are probably right. I'm sorry that I have mislead people to believe that the SD9 colors are not accurate. I have removed my miscorrected samples.

Enjoy your new camera!

Regards,
Geir R
 
No problem, but now I am confused. The original in your Picture looked differen then my picture in the Internet Explorer but it looked the same in Photoshop. So again the reminder to all the people in this forum (I know that you know it Geir) not to judge from what you see in IE.

I had a similar problem with the ICC profiles (but more on that at the end of this posting). If I don't know about the lightning in the scene I sometimes think the colors of the picture are not correct (remember the picture with the bike posted by Carl) but they are. I have made some succes with a color profile that takes some of the yellow cast on the skin tones (not so much what you did) but left the color or the hair of the left girl intact, corrected the greens but i screwed up the red/magenta hair of the girl in the middle, it looked better afterwards but a lot of color information was lost in the darker colors.

I have made some strange experience with the ICC profils now, aplying them in Photoshop creates a completly different result than applying them with the small tool supplied with lcms. The difference show up on very dark colors or saturated colors. The same colors were the icc profiles I created with lcms destroy the colors.

And it is not missleading, sometimes the colors produced by the SD9 are off but not in this particular case... maybe you can post your samples again so that the people see what we were talking about. Thanks for your input on this, I think it was quite good to discuss this.

Dominic
Sorry Geir I have to correct you, the colors are off in your versions.
The hair is to red in your pic and the yellow cast on the skintones
is alright in my version, the sun was quite low and everything
looked yellow this day because of this yellow (unusal dark)
sunlight that was nearly in my back while shooting this picture.
The hair of the girl on the left is completly wrong your version. I
tried your presets on some of my other indoor images and they have
a red cast after aplying. Actually Red is a bit overdone in your
presets. The other problem is that not all yellows need to be
fixed, but by fixing all yellows of picture with the hue/saturation
tool you change some yellows that are ok. The problem is that the
icc profiles I made do a good job on this point but have the
problem with green...
Ok Dominic, you are probably right. I'm sorry that I have mislead
people to believe that the SD9 colors are not accurate. I have
removed my miscorrected samples.

Enjoy your new camera!

Regards,
Geir R
--
http://www.pbase.com/dgross
ICQ UIN: 289647506
 
No problem, but now I am confused. The original in your Picture
looked differen then my picture in the Internet Explorer but it
looked the same in Photoshop. So again the reminder to all the
people in this forum (I know that you know it Geir) not to judge
from what you see in IE.
The latest profile I used was fine tuned more towards the Greg MacBeth color chart (daylight) from IR. It included a red shift adjustment because there was a magenta cast in the red hair. Why I adjusted the red? See below!
I had a similar problem with the ICC profiles (but more on that at
I tried your ICC profiles. In Photoshop they only did some extreme adjustments to the levels + some adjustments that appeared to be a white balance correction. It did not correct for the general hue errors that the SD9 images are prone to.
And it is not missleading, sometimes the colors produced by the SD9
are off but not in this particular case... maybe you can post your
samples again so that the people see what we were talking about.
Thanks for your input on this, I think it was quite good to discuss
this.
I'm not going to argue about this, because the photographer himself should know the best! As I do not have the SD9 myself, I'm not able to perform extensive tests in order to support my own theories. However, after lots of hours analyzing the colors on the Gretag Macbeth test charts, I'm quite sure how it all connects in general.



Phil's SD9 color chart. Hue deviation values from ideal.

For example, the D60 chart is more closer to the ideal:



Phil's D60 color chart. A general hue shift of +3 will make it even closer to ideal.

The pattern is confirmed by the spectrum measurements in this article:
http://www.digit-life.com/articles2/sigma9sd/index.html

The spectrum readings (autocontrast and blur applied):



The overlaps are too large in the SD9 spectrum (mostly in the red to green range, but also in the green to blue range). What should be more red becomes orange with the SD9 (this includes skin tones). What should be more blue can become more "dull" (greenish blue). The red reading in the long wave range is too intense compared to the "normal red" (more orange on the SD9), green and blue. I can see most of the hue shifted color "problems" that the SD9 has in this spectrum reading, and this is what I've been trying for hours to fine tune to a more ideal level. It's not an easy task to manually adjust it to the best possible result, and lately I've become rather frustrated! The main reason for this, is that there are some specific problems with the hues that will not be possible to solve. Also, it would be useful to have a larger color chart with more colors to operate on.

The ideal Gretag MacBeth hue chart:



To understand what I mean with frustrating problems, then have a closer look at the red and pink hue values... look at the values on the SD9 chart and think how they should relate to each other. The red hue error is even more worse on the IR chart, reading a value of approx 349 (should be 358). To make it worse, the pink hue value on the IR chart is reading approx 1 (should be 354). The essence of the problem is: You can't have both correct - it is impossible! The red hue error will easily "polute" what should be pure reds in images. They will have a magenta cast to them. Therefore I think it is better to adjust the red, and accept that the pink will be "less" pink, because in most situations the error in the pink hue will be less noticeable.

Geir R
 
Hey Geir,

I don't want to argue about this with you cause you made a really good job with the presets. But the hair of the girl is even more magenta than my original picture shows... I had a second look today, so there is absolutley no need to shift this hue towards red, it might even require some more magenta (like one of those ICC profiles did, but it screwed all the contrasts up). If you want "a larger color chart with more colors to operate on" thats the reason why I posted the it8.7 pictures. Anyway the results LCMS gives me are still just anoying. The Hue shifts were not that bad in my tests and there is a problem you can't fix by simply shifting the hue. But (as I mentioned it quite a few times) It is even worser than just shifting hues, for different levels of saturation of colors the hues have to be shifted differently (at least this is my conclusion after viewing some shoots of it8.7 targets) and this is simply imposible with the hue/saturation tool, the only way to do this properly is ICC... but we would need someone how is an expert with lcms and all this icc stuff ...

Regards

Dominic
--
http://www.pbase.com/dgross
ICQ UIN: 289647506
 
I made a photo of the it8.7 target under a Lighting quite similar to the one that iluminated this red hair picture. And applied the ICC profile LCMS made from this new it8.7 shoot to the picture. The result looks good in terms of color, the skin tones are a bit more like in your version but the color of the hair is much better, but the ICC profile destroyed a lot of color information... I really need some expert :)



--
http://www.pbase.com/dgross
ICQ UIN: 289647506
 
Hey Geir,
I don't want to argue about this with you cause you made a really
good job with the presets. But the hair of the girl is even more
magenta than my original picture shows... I had a second look
today, so there is absolutley no need to shift this hue towards
red, it might even require some more magenta (like one of those ICC
profiles did, but it screwed all the contrasts up). If you want "a
Dominic,

The red range of the SD9 spectrum is a big headache to me, not only because of the findings I mentioned in my previous post (pink/red hues are "switching places" with the pure red moving heavily towards magenta), but also because it appears to differ so much from image to image. I suspect that hues are changing quite a bit with the exposure, which is not a good thing if the exposure is within what should be considered as reasonable. I initially left out the red hue adjustment as a separate (optional) profile because of the red/pink problem. Still, it doesn't make sense that the hue values of the red & pink colors are "switching place" so easily as seen on the color charts.

Looking at the red/magenta hair on your original image, then I can see a hue shift that varies with the intensity (similar to the what I see indications of in the color charts). Parts of the hair (mainly among the bright/reflected areas) is shifted towards magenta, while the rest (mainly within the darker parts) is staying closer to a more pure red. Tip: Try a magenta color range selection in PS (with greyscale preview), and you will notice the magenta intensity around highlighted parts in the hair. Looks a bit odd. This kind of color hue changes which varies so much with the intensity (due to reflection of the sun) doesn't look realistic to me. The Gretag MacBeth chart doesn't have any colors in the range 322 to 355 (the range between magenta and magenta red), so I'm not sure what's going on in that range.

The IT8.7 images you posted are very noisy, and I'm not sure they can be so useful because of this. In what light condition did you take these? What could be useful is 3 versions (X3F) of the chart taken in bright sunshine, auto white balance, with camera exposure compensations -2ev, 0ev and +2ev. A list of the original color values of the chart (either L*a*b or HSB) would be necessary.

Best regards,
Geir R
 
I am still in the process of finding out what caused the noise... Light was a 250 W and 500 W Lamp which are normally used for Video.
The IT8.7 images you posted are very noisy, and I'm not sure they
can be so useful because of this. In what light condition did you
take these? What could be useful is 3 versions (X3F) of the chart
taken in bright sunshine, auto white balance, with camera exposure
compensations -2ev, 0ev and +2ev. A list of the original color
values of the chart (either L*a*b or HSB) would be necessary.

Best regards,
Geir R
--
http://www.pbase.com/dgross
ICQ UIN: 289647506
 
I am still in the process of finding out what caused the noise...
Light was a 250 W and 500 W Lamp which are normally used for Video.
Hmm.. was it tungsten light? I have had a tough time to get good pictures in tungsten light, and it definately gives more noise than with flash or pure sunlight. And colors are bit difficult in this light, even with manual white balance. However, that is with my Canon S40 - but perhaps this type of light is a bit difficult with the SD9/Foveon as well?

Geir R
 
For the lightening of the room there are 5 Halogen Spots as far as I remember they have 30W each. In Adition to that I used the 250W and 500W and a smaller 30W Videolight (they are based on a halogenspots too, just with some sort of filter in front of the lightsource.
I am still in the process of finding out what caused the noise...
Light was a 250 W and 500 W Lamp which are normally used for Video.
Hmm.. was it tungsten light? I have had a tough time to get good
pictures in tungsten light, and it definately gives more noise
than with flash or pure sunlight. And colors are bit difficult in
this light, even with manual white balance. However, that is with
my Canon S40 - but perhaps this type of light is a bit difficult
with the SD9/Foveon as well?

Geir R
--
http://www.pbase.com/dgross
ICQ UIN: 289647506
 
Why do not think the sensor and convertor problems ?
here is a sample image to clear your questions.



This is a target image generated on computer screen.



This is a captured image, P and AF mode with 24-70 F2.8 DG/DF
and staturation option +0.5, sharpen +0.5.

You can belive it?
but, It's a basic and critical problem of SD9.
Both shoots are straight out of the Camera, just auto setting of
Photo Pro used and Photoshop to convert to jpeg. No aadditional
corrections. All the Colors (Skin Tones, (red) hair, bricks of the
building) are accurate.





24-70mm/3.5-5.6, ISO 200, 1/250, f9.5
--
http://www.pbase.com/dgross
ICQ UIN: 289647506
--
SD9 with 24-70DG2.8
 
If this is what you did then I just have to say that this is not going to work with any Kamera I have seen, FILM, CCD, CMOS, Videokameras (SVHS,DV). It is impossible to make a picture of a Display showing something with getting the colors right. And with the sd9 you will have to add the colorclipping because the screen is a ligthsource.


This is a target image generated on computer screen.



This is a captured image, P and AF mode with 24-70 F2.8 DG/DF
and staturation option +0.5, sharpen +0.5.

You can belive it?
but, It's a basic and critical problem of SD9.
Both shoots are straight out of the Camera, just auto setting of
Photo Pro used and Photoshop to convert to jpeg. No aadditional
corrections. All the Colors (Skin Tones, (red) hair, bricks of the
building) are accurate.





24-70mm/3.5-5.6, ISO 200, 1/250, f9.5
--
http://www.pbase.com/dgross
ICQ UIN: 289647506
--
SD9 with 24-70DG2.8
--
http://www.pbase.com/dgross
ICQ UIN: 289647506
 
There seems to be enormous amount of noise on the shadow side of the brick wall. Is that normal for SD9?
Both shoots are straight out of the Camera, just auto setting of
Photo Pro used and Photoshop to convert to jpeg. No aadditional
corrections. All the Colors (Skin Tones, (red) hair, bricks of the
building) are accurate.

 
basically, raw information of X3F has low noise compare other models such as S2Pro, D100. But, information is obtained by mixed color data. so, color separation be required. In this process, noise in low light area be increased dramtically. So, Can't avoid this problems.

We should be wait the new version of convertor (Photo Pro) can't more higher NR supporting.
Both shoots are straight out of the Camera, just auto setting of
Photo Pro used and Photoshop to convert to jpeg. No aadditional
corrections. All the Colors (Skin Tones, (red) hair, bricks of the
building) are accurate.

--
SD9 with 24-70DG2.8
 
Ok,
I can undertand your opinions.

and I have a TRV2000 (sony, 3CCD DV) and I have been test the same image without trouble.

Color temperature is not same as the target via media such as film, CCD, CMOS or others.

BUT, I want to say about

(1) Abnormal color changing via intencity
(2) Abnormal gray color changing in high intencity area.

AND, I want to say about

(1) How can understand about the color difference
between low intencity area and high intencity area.

Check this sample image



It's a test pattern to check the color



It's a decompressed raw data.
In this test, can't found the color change. OK?



It's a relative intencity of sensor information with green light source



It's a relative intencity of sensor information with red light source



It's a relative intencity of sensor information with blue light source

The relative intencity via light level and properties were measured with the colored light source have no problems.
but, color changing is a problems (be occured by the color separation process).

Color problems is appreared only in HIGHER light level.
To avoid this problems, Default light level of SD9 is so low.

I am falling in puzzle,
(1) to get the color, I overcome the noise problems
(2) to get the clean image, I overcome the color problems.

27-70mm/2.8, ISO100, 1/10S, F4.0
color temperature of source = 6800k
 
I have tried it with my 3 CCD Panasonic DX1 (remember this tube like thing) which is according to some tests still the best low light DV Camera around. And the results were not too good. Anyway I understand the point of color shiftings in correlation to high light levels or in my opinion hi saturation levels. But I don't think we should argue so much about Color it is not so much worser or better than the colors of the other DSLR around. The noise issue is much more dramatic!
Ok,
I can undertand your opinions.
and I have a TRV2000 (sony, 3CCD DV) and I have been test the same
image without trouble.
Color temperature is not same as the target via media such as film,
CCD, CMOS or others.

BUT, I want to say about

(1) Abnormal color changing via intencity
(2) Abnormal gray color changing in high intencity area.

AND, I want to say about

(1) How can understand about the color difference
between low intencity area and high intencity area.

Check this sample image



It's a test pattern to check the color



It's a decompressed raw data.
In this test, can't found the color change. OK?



It's a relative intencity of sensor information with green light
source



It's a relative intencity of sensor information with red light source



It's a relative intencity of sensor information with blue light source

The relative intencity via light level and properties were measured
with the colored light source have no problems.
but, color changing is a problems (be occured by the color
separation process).

Color problems is appreared only in HIGHER light level.
To avoid this problems, Default light level of SD9 is so low.

I am falling in puzzle,
(1) to get the color, I overcome the noise problems
(2) to get the clean image, I overcome the color problems.

27-70mm/2.8, ISO100, 1/10S, F4.0
color temperature of source = 6800k
--
http://www.pbase.com/dgross
ICQ UIN: 289647506
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top