OK
Panasonic did a great job on the LX3:
wide-angle ,wide aperture ,OK high ISO ,and great design.
To make it the perfect wide-angle P&S ,they need to release a new firmware, in order to solve color issues (I hope that it can be fixed with new firmware).
Here are things they should correct:
First and foremost - fix to accurate colors:
It can be done by applying different default color curves ,or colour profile (like Nikon D300 have),and may leave the old-color profile as an option (as one of the "film" options).
Second,if you can ,add the florescent option (at least one) to WB options,and ,if possible ,an option to a flash WB (or auto-WB compensation when using internal flash).
3rd - Since pictures tend to get "under exposed" ,change default exposure to higher (however - not mandatory).
Seriously, I've been considering buying this camera,but I'm put-off by inaccurate colors.
I hope Panasonic will release this new firmware,possibly because it will make it worth for them (sales).
Thanks Pana
Panasonic did a great job on the LX3:
wide-angle ,wide aperture ,OK high ISO ,and great design.
To make it the perfect wide-angle P&S ,they need to release a new firmware, in order to solve color issues (I hope that it can be fixed with new firmware).
Here are things they should correct:
First and foremost - fix to accurate colors:
It can be done by applying different default color curves ,or colour profile (like Nikon D300 have),and may leave the old-color profile as an option (as one of the "film" options).
Second,if you can ,add the florescent option (at least one) to WB options,and ,if possible ,an option to a flash WB (or auto-WB compensation when using internal flash).
3rd - Since pictures tend to get "under exposed" ,change default exposure to higher (however - not mandatory).
Seriously, I've been considering buying this camera,but I'm put-off by inaccurate colors.
I hope Panasonic will release this new firmware,possibly because it will make it worth for them (sales).
Thanks Pana