Is less dynamic range but more color depth possible?

al404

Leading Member
Messages
992
Reaction score
287
Location
Novara, IT
I’ve owned all three of these cameras, and while I haven’t done any controlled tests, it seems to me that the X-T5 offers better color depth.

This is especially noticeable when shooting at sunset, where the sky is filled with a wide range of tones. In those situations, the X-T5 appears to capture significantly more subtle color variations compared to the X-T3 and X-T2.

As far as I know, higher dynamic range typically translates to greater color depth but in this case, it almost feels like the opposite.

Even Fujifilm claims that the X-T5 can render more color shades.

I no longer have the camera, but I’m considering buying one again.

48d81d14e4bc4d18b67c05ed63973a6a.jpg.png

--
https://www.instagram.com/dev4web_it/
 
Last edited:
I’ve owned all three of these cameras, and while I haven’t done any controlled tests, it seems to me that the X-T5 offers better color depth.

This is especially noticeable when shooting at sunset, where the sky is filled with a wide range of tones. In those situations, the X-T5 appears to capture significantly more subtle color variations compared to the X-T3 and X-T2.

As far as I know, higher dynamic range typically translates to greater color depth but in this case, it almost feels like the opposite.

Even Fujifilm claims that the X-T5 can render more color shades.

I no longer have the camera, but I’m considering buying one again.
Don't see anything between them to shake a stick at. Are you talking about the JPEGs the cameras produce? I processed the two raw files.

de6db6f4ea2847959ef09b8ccc4a5050.jpg
 
Last edited:

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top