How about a Hunting Thread

I use a blind similar to that for some of my photography except it is portable too. I works quite well and is big enough for my chair, equipment and lunch too. Here it is set up in front of my home.




I like wandering around the fields and bush with my camera. One day I came across a strange looking bale of straw



--

KimR
 
Thanks for the comments Kim. You will be eating well this winter. I just love some back strap and eggs on Sunday mornings. Really enjoyed your pictures. Well done and continued success.

regards,
Outsider
 
Hunting and fishing afford some magnificent photo ops. In particular, scenes of hunters and dogs crossing a cornfield or crouching at a hillcrest. To stand along a river is majestic enough, whether the fish bite or do not. Some group pictures of hunters or fishers in the outdoors are the only pictures some males ever have of their friends together. But, darnit, there's that urge to capture the shot of the victor hoisting his game or catch for the world to see. No sin, perhaps. Even vegans eat plants sacrificed for their stomachs enjoyment. But few of those "look what I caught" pictures involve any photographic skill or give much to remember. A clear telephoto shot of a pheasant on a dim November morning can be, on the other hand, very difficult to attain. The birds don't pose, aren't in an enclosure, may be hiding in brush, and the light may be low or against you. People should be lenient if few such pictures come out well. It is easier to get turkey shots, even with a humble P&S (hence the proverbial "turkey shoot"), if they are gorging on fallen corn or become accustomed to hand-outs. Fish are difficult to photograph while in the water, with the exception of certain streams under favorable light, but the fishermen casting or playing their rods to lure or reel the fish are a valid photographic subject. While absorbed in the passion, people who might otherwise be to bashful or awkward to appear in a photo can become larger than life.

Just a POV.
 
Just thought I’d add something to this very complex subject. As the title suggests I am not comfortable with the thought of killing anything. The family think I’m weird because I don’t kill insects and spiders. If a spider is where he is not welcome he is gently picked up and taken somewhere he will be more appreciated, usually the garden.

Live and let live however also applies to my fellow man and although I might not agree with the hunter, I do respect his rights to do what he likes providing he doesn’t publicly offend me and providing he does it within the law.

I don’t have that respect for many of the hunters that we have here in Europe, in places like Malta, Cyprus and France, where they illegally blast migrating birds from the sky, not for fun but for the shear pleasure of seeing them drop. The damage these people do the eco system is incalculable.

I hope that the hunters will respect my views as I respect theirs but I agree with others in that I think this is a dangerous place to address such a confrontational subject even if all it is sharing pictures. Anybody who feels the need to pursue a hunting thread could make sure that the title gives plenty of warning so that you they will at least be able to say “I warned you, no one made you look”.

PS I don’t like zoo pictures either so I just ignore threads with zoo in the title. It works for me.

--



My Galleries are at
http://picasaweb.google.com/trevorfcarpenter
 
This is a photography forum. I have no issues with the concept of hunting - assuming you eat what you kill.

Having said that, the photo still has to be interesting - otherwise it's just a snapshot for your photo album (no different than the thousands of snapshots I have from family vacations).

For example, here's a thread from another forum (if you don't like dog/hunt photos no need to look there):
http://forums.steves-digicams.com/nikon-dslr/193221-spaniel-field-trial.html

I think the poster there captured some very interesting PHOTOS of the experience.

For the most part though - the snaps another poster in this thread printed - of the hunter over the kill really don't have any photographic merit to them. Fine for the hunter in their album as snapshots, but as photographs there isn't much merit in them.
 
As long as you don't cause unessasey suffering & you eat it... you can kill it in my book!

Unfortunatly these photos are a bit lame.... lame as the bird you shot...

If you had good photos I could understand the post - as it stands its probably more a provocative post than a photographic one! cus the content is poor....

Ok now I will be more constructive about it all - both images - soft, need higher shutter speed? (maybe just DPR resizing), low contrast looks washed (PP might fix this) 2nd one, not grate composition - should be tighter on the action (i.e. portrait - frame: dog, bird, just man with gun... nothing else)... this would make a far stronger image - actualy could be a very good photo given these corrections.

1st one is close to an image of a dogs ass... subject is not captavating - not in (good) action...

Can you say Horizon?....

If they were good images you could be proud of then I could understand the post! - not that DPR has many good photos at all these days!
 
Iowa has instituted a Mourning Dove Season.

http://www.iowadnr.gov/Portals/idnr/uploads/Hunting/mdove_fact.pdf

Licensed participants are limited to 15 birds per day. 15 together might provide the meat of a chicken, though be a nuisance to clean, remove the birdshot, and cook. A 12-gauge shell costs about $0.75, so that works out to about $11 for the gross equivalent of a chicken, without factoring the cost of cleaning or the fuel, beverages, and whatnot consumed during the hunt.

This might be sporting if hunters were restricted to catching the birds with a butterfly net or a sling shot. The things are so docile and unwary, a skilled marksman with 22 caliber pistol could down them with relative ease. However, the law, applying perhaps a no-hunter-left-behind standard, allows use of shotguns. The DNR constitutents who buy the licenses and lobby the legislature think that's OK.

Missouri, Texas, Tennessee, and some other states have dove season. Enthusiasts may incur less crossfire if they discuss the sport in forums dedicated to those of shared mindset.
 
LMAO@so that some idiot in the east can get his **** up with powered hair.
 
I am a hunter and photographer. My take is your post is fine with me but it needs to be in a hunting forum, not the Oly post. I can give 100 reasons why hunting is needed and why people who are activists against it really don't understand conservation and haven't seen animals starve to death from over browse which is a much worse fate than a hunters arrow or bullet. But I won't get into that, knowing your audience when your forum is general means there are certain subjects that are to controversial such as this and should not be posted. A picture of your dog running into the brush is fine without the title hunting attached. Common sense is the key.
Eric
 
On a slight side shoot... doh!

Can you use hunting scopes with cameras in any way? Either by just using camera with kit lens and looking through them or by attaching adaptors to them so the sensor works directly with the gun optics?

How good are gun optics? are they like 600mm zoom at F2??? or 120mm @ F16?
 
I mean, I'm perfectly happy to live with the subject, but shouldn't we be judging the quality of the photos? This is a photo site, isn't it?

We've got a photo with some dog with his tail and leg cut off, butt towards us, face invisible, in what looks like a bunch of dried weeds. I don't know if he's hunting or looking for a good place to pee. Did someone drop the camera and it accidentally shot something :)?

How come no one comments on the photo quality here?
 
Powered hair = Rhino horn which is actually compacted hair. You have as much chance of getting an erection from chewing you finger nails.

Some game farm owners are experimenting with inserting some nasty stuff in t the horn that could lead to dead dicks. Amazingly though its illegal . Electric fence=OK deadly horn = No.

Well I supposed when you land up with 1000 dead people in the east ( Where rhino horn is banned ) people get a bit nervous. But that is the problem animals have on rights to survive when it comes to the Alpha predator.

We have another situation where t here is a tribe that wears leopard skins and to be a man you have to kill your leopard. Well in the old days when you hunted with spears it was Hunters 1 leopards 4 and you where REALLY a man. Now sit back 200 meters bang , bang as many leopard's as you can find or bullets in the gun. There are 9 year olds that wear skins. It is all illegal but most things are. The leopards are extremely endangered. Ah but the best is part is put foot trap down catch the leopard and then shoot it at your leasure.

--
Collin

(Aficionado Olympus DSLR )

http://collinbaxter.zenfolio.com/

Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away. (George Carlin)

New Seventh Wonder of the World.

 
1) I do not object to the topic. Personally I'd like to see more outdoor photographs that involve many elements of hunting.

2) From a photographic point of view....you may want to attempt to make the "hunt" more personal. Give a better view of the hunters, maybe their faces, or some close-ups of them with their gear and dog. Safety being very important and obvious, it can be much more difficult to shoot from angles that illustrate the intensity (facial expressions of the dog for lack of better terms).

Gary
 
I agree about the photo thing!

But you left me scratching my head with the comments about the missing foot/tail. The two images posted by the OP (or the one's I've looked at) include a complete dog. Framing nor physically injured dog missing feet or tails (beyond what is acceptable for the tail of a German S.H. Pointer).

The "weeds"...looks like a corn field to me and that represents a fairly popular setting for Pheasant Hunting (though there are some weeds).

Though I commented on the photos (in one of my other post) I feel the photographer was attempting to illustrate the dog working, sniffing, and basically "pointing" to the location of the bird (in the "weeds"). And in the other photograph the bird has flushed...a pair of hunters and the bird in the air can be seen.

Shooting from a "safe" location/angle that would reveal the "face" of the dog can be very tricky stuff! But certainly the two photos included by the OP almost "need" to show the "face" of the dog in order to make these shots "better".
 
When I saw the light fading in a bucks eye as it was dying that was it never again.
Nicly said and I agree with you. I eat meat, I know that most of what I eat has been brought up un a meat factory and had a more miserable life than the buck shot by pleasure hunters but hunting with guns is not my pleasure and is not my way of enjoyment. I hate poachers who shoot just for the pleasure and the trophy. I also hate cages and zoos but also understand the necessity for some of them.

Cheers.
 
Powered hair = Rhino horn which is actually compacted hair. You have as much chance of getting an erection from chewing you finger nails.

Some game farm owners are experimenting with inserting some nasty stuff in t the horn that could lead to dead dicks. Amazingly though its illegal . Electric fence=OK deadly horn = No.

Well I supposed when you land up with 1000 dead people in the east ( Where rhino horn is banned ) people get a bit nervous. But that is the problem animals have on rights to survive when it comes to the Alpha predator.

We have another situation where t here is a tribe that wears leopard skins and to be a man you have to kill your leopard. Well in the old days when you hunted with spears it was Hunters 1 leopards 4 and you where REALLY a man. Now sit back 200 meters bang , bang as many leopard's as you can find or bullets in the gun. There are 9 year olds that wear skins. It is all illegal but most things are. The leopards are extremely endangered. Ah but the best is part is put foot trap down catch the leopard and then shoot it at your leasure.
Those are horrible stories but the problem is that the people who watch TV programs and read about these in the papers or on the WEB are the wrong people. The other party is sticking their head in the sand and may even claim that you, and those who agree with you, are lying. I agree, shooting from 200 meters, maybe from a jeep as well, is not that manly at all. The leopard or the rhino doesn't really have a fair chance and in the worst case gets away wounded, dying a painful slow death alone. All that for the pleasure of proofing manhood, pride and braveness.
 
Collin just answered WTF I was lmao about....
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top