Jim Lewis
Senior Member
Yes, that's exactly what the term means. I picked this up from a British DP publication about eight months ago, but since then have seen it several other places -- and it's a snap to test it yourself to see if you agree with the results. A series of 10% bicubic interpolations produces noticeably better results than one single interpolation. Since it's a repetitive process, you can build an action to accomplish this.I'm unfamiliar with the term
"step interpolation." Does this mean res-ing it up in steps rather
than all at once? I seem to have better results making the canvas
size bigger, then scaling the image up to fit the new canvas
size...rather than chaning "image size."
Fred Miranda has done some tweaking of this and built an action that I'm told improves on it, though this is heresay.
And from you, I got the tip on changing canvas size first. Thanks. Gotta give that a try.
Enjoy your G3. If it's as much fun as the G2, you'll have a ball.
--
Jim Lewis
http://www.pbase.com/pdx_photoman
http://www.jimlewis.info
Tools of Choice: Canon G2, Elan IIE, CanonScan FS4000US, Photoshop 7, Epson 2000P