Reading mode: Light Dark

firmware 1.12

Go to last post
claypaws said:
Thanks Charles. Might you be able to email me 1.04, 1.06 and 1.08
then please?
Click to expand...
Sure! It will be later tonight though.
claypaws said:
That is not the important question. The following is!

I wonder if you can confirm these MD5 checksums. You see, I also
downloaded 1.08 (so they said) from http://drivers.softpedia.com/

But its MD5 checksum is the same as the 1.12 from fujifilm.com

So either the supposed 1.08 on softpedia is in fact 1.12 or Fuji's
supposed 1.12 is in fact 1.08, which would be more alarming.

These are the MD5 checksums I have:

1.09 via fujifilm.co.jp 2515AE432D83B4C186F531F392A80D3D
1.11 via fujifilm.co.jp C7371A748136CF8AE81927978464F169
1.12 via fujifilm.com 6A913E9C6B9AE181087A1AAE8349B6AC

With any luck, your 1.08 should not match any of those!

The 1.11 that Adam-T kindly emailed me matches the MD5 checksum for
the fujifilm.co.jp version 1.11. I am confident that is right because
Adam has used it.
Click to expand...
I am sure that the versions I have are correct and will check the checksum.

--
Charles
My family images are at http://www.stakeman.smugmug.com
Be sure of your subject.
Never, force the shot.
 
Thanks Charles, I shall no doubt be asleep while you are doing that!
--
******************************************************
I have a home on pbase
http://www.pbase.com/claypaws/
If you have the time to look
******************************************************
 
I'm sorry. I could'nt resist
I did upgrade my S5 and it works fine.



Henry F. Smith Jr
Http: www.glensummitimage.com
 
1.04 safely received. Thank you.

I also solved the mystery over the MD5 checksum of 1.08 from softpedia.

Their download link resolves to the current update link on the fujifilm global site. So it gets 1.12. Doh!
--
******************************************************
I have a home on pbase
http://www.pbase.com/claypaws/
If you have the time to look
******************************************************
 
I followed the link, agreed to the user agreement and downloaded FPUpdate.exe (I am using XP Pro). If I double click the .exe it wants to open FPUPDATE.DAT - were do I get the .DAT file? The fuji instructions mention both the .exe and .dat files. Am I missing something here??
--
Mehdi
Fuji S5pro, Casio Exlim-Z55, Nikon 8400, Panasonic FZ-30

Sigma 10-20 f4, 18-55 f2.8, 50-150 f2.8, 100-300 f4, 1.4x. Nikon 35-70 f2.8, SB50
 
CWilt said:
The others did not make it through???
Click to expand...
No. I got one email, subject line "1.04" with the 1.04 dat file (I assume) attached. That is all.

I was too polite to ask for more! But 1.06 and 1.08 would be nice!

Cheers,

Stephen
--
******************************************************
I have a home on pbase
http://www.pbase.com/claypaws/
If you have the time to look
******************************************************
 
MehdiT said:
I followed the link, agreed to the user agreement and downloaded
FPUpdate.exe (I am using XP Pro). If I double click the .exe it wants
to open FPUPDATE.DAT - were do I get the .DAT file? The fuji
instructions mention both the .exe and .dat files. Am I missing
something here??
Click to expand...
Yes, you are missing something ;-)

The link is at the top right of their page, next to the picture of the camera.

http://www.fujifilm.com/products/digital/download/s5pro/index.html
--
******************************************************
I have a home on pbase
http://www.pbase.com/claypaws/
If you have the time to look
******************************************************
 
claypaws said:
No. I got one email, subject line "1.04" with the 1.04 dat file (I
assume) attached. That is all.
Click to expand...
correct
claypaws said:
I was too polite to ask for more! But 1.06 and 1.08 would be nice!
Click to expand...
That is odd because I sent the others as well. Perhaps it was to much. Will send the others tonight once I make it home. Sorry for the delay.

--
Charles
My family images are at http://www.stakeman.smugmug.com
Be sure of your subject.
Never, force the shot.
 
CWilt said:
That is odd because I sent the others as well. Perhaps it was to
much. Will send the others tonight once I make it home. Sorry for the
delay.
Click to expand...
Must have been bounced by one of the email servers along the way. Nothing to apologise for :-)

Cheers

Stephen

--
******************************************************
I have a home on pbase
http://www.pbase.com/claypaws/
If you have the time to look
******************************************************
 
Crystal,

It didnt occur to me until I went shooting with v1.12 last night

Doesnt the AWB under flourescent remind you of what you traditionally see with Nikon cameras, particularly the D3 and D700?

It was the green cast I saw with harsh fluorescent lighting and a weird orange cast on long exposure with v1.12 that made me go "Wait, Ive seen this before.."

v1.12 , SOOC under fluorescent outdoor event lighting, AWB:

Note the greenish cast







(incandescent and fluorescent)

With v1.09, that green under harsh fluorescent wouldve been squelched with a more neutral cast







In comparison, SOOC shot under flourescent with the D700





(The light is nasty here, but I was more interested in the AWB handling and colors)

Or a D50



Its not that its so bad, but I find it interesting that under v1.12 - the AWB responses under certain conditions make the images look almost like theyre from a Nikon. Hmm, I wonder...
  • Joe
acrystalball said:
Yep, experiencing the same as you so I want to go back also.
Thanks again!
Crystal
--
http://www.crystalkeesey.com
Click to expand...
 
Sorry to be a pain could someone please email me 1.09

Thanks

Richard
claypaws said:
Adam-T said:
claypaws said:
relevant .dat file to the card in a card reader with Windows?
Click to expand...
Yep, that's what I did last time - in the Root directory
Click to expand...
Thanks Adam. I might give it a whirl once I can get hold of a 1.09
and a 1.11 .dat file as fallbacks in case 1.12 is a horror.

Beats me why Fuji don't leave them all on the website. I can flash my
motherboard bios with any update ever released just by going to the
manufacturer website.

--
******************************************************
I have a home on pbase
http://www.pbase.com/claypaws/
If you have the time to look
******************************************************
Click to expand...
 
Yeah, but except for one other thing, so far thats the only fault I can find with v1.12, which is pretty good. And frankly, I like the improved focus performance over v1.09.

Im still testing it though, so in a week or so, I'll know what I think of it.
zygh said:
joepennant said:
Its not that its so bad, but I find it interesting that under v1.12 -
the AWB responses under certain conditions make the images look
almost like theyre from a Nikon. Hmm, I wonder...
Click to expand...
That gets me scared. If that's the case, I'm seriously thinking about
going back to v1.09...

--
http://flickr.com/photos/zygh/show/
http://zygh.deviantart.com/gallery/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/gearporn/
-equipment in profile-
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
PSA: Z6III video shooters, update to 1.02 ASAP
Replies
5
Views
295
ClintGryke
C
TheSoaringSprite
Zf Firmware 2.0 Ready for Download
2 3 4
Replies
62
Views
7K
fotosean
fotosean
Jeffery1987
Motion Cam Pro
Replies
15
Views
15K
Jeffery1987
Jeffery1987
Z
A WIDE-RANGING REVIEW OF TOPAZ LABS - WARNING LONG POST
2
Replies
28
Views
20K
Ernie Misner
Ernie Misner
joger
LAB 35 f/1.2 on A7R IV ~ you can literally feel the smooooothness - tested against GM 35 & Loxia 35
2 3
Replies
59
Views
6K
joger
joger

Keyboard shortcuts

f
Forum
m
My threads
Mobile site
About
Editorial content
Cameras & Lenses
Community
All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998–2025 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.
When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
©GPS Media - Guides, Products, Services.
Back
Top