Uncle Frank, you have a beautiful specimen here (compliments to Aunt Nancy), and you've positioned it within the frame in a manner that shows it off to its best advantage. The stem acts effectively as a line that draws the eye to the focal point of your composition.
While the Committee agrees that this is a good submission, it is not unanimous in its opinion that this would qualify as a wall hanger.
In addition to the not-quite-saturated area Phil spotted, the Committee respectfully points out the following observations:
-there is a little imperfection at the base of the stem, just to the right, that intersects the frame bevel on the lower edge.
-it appears there may have been some clone work on the stem where the flower shaft intersects with the leaf stem and the plant stem. Without the original pic to compare, one cannot discern for certain what is amiss here, but there appear to be some "dead-ending" of components.
-while the very center of the flower is tack sharp, the pink petals seem a bit soft around the edges, and the rightmost edge of the pink petal (at about 2'oclock) shows a bit of a halo, perhaps the result of post processing the background. This area might be addressed by doing some additional work to adjust the edge colors using the clone tool in darken/lighten mode.
Thus, while the Committee feels this is a very good effort, we believe that the powerful combination of your talents as a photographer and a master of Photoshop technique, along with the sophisticated features of your camera, will likely be even better showcased in your next submission. The Committee eagerly awaits.
--
Dawn
FCAS Member #89
With camera in hand, I see what I might otherwise overlook
C P 5 7 0 0
pbase supporter
http://www.pbase.com/dlane/new_camera