DR testing results

i will change to uncompressed even though compressed is suppose to be 14 stops on the a7iv. im a bit confussed as bit depth has no correlation to DR.
If you encode in a linear manner, bit-depth defines the maximum DR that you can encode in the file:

https://www.dpreview.com/articles/4...e-not-the-number-of-colors-you-get-to-capture

This isn't true for anything where you've applied a curve to the data first, but in linear Raw, it can act as a limit on how much you can store.

Richard - DPReview.com
 
i will change to uncompressed even though compressed is suppose to be 14 stops on the a7iv. im a bit confussed as bit depth has no correlation to DR.
If you encode in a linear manner, bit-depth defines the maximum DR that you can encode in the file:

https://www.dpreview.com/articles/4...e-not-the-number-of-colors-you-get-to-capture

This isn't true for anything where you've applied a curve to the data first, but in linear Raw, it can act as a limit on how much you can store.

Richard - DPReview.com
After my more accurate testing this morning im going to give that one to you 😁 the 14 bit can definatly play a big roll ,expecially the colours in the mids when lifting a 7 stop under exposed image not as much in the highlights at 3 stop over exposed though. ive learnt somthing today pushing images to the extreme. Thanks for your info in this thread.
 
Last edited:
i will change to uncompressed even though compressed is suppose to be 14 stops on the a7iv. im a bit confussed as bit depth has no correlation to DR.
If you encode in a linear manner, bit-depth defines the maximum DR that you can encode in the file:
I prefer to call it precision, rather than it-depth. Long before we had digital cameras, we were using the word precision to define the concept.
 
i will change to uncompressed even though compressed is suppose to be 14 stops on the a7iv. im a bit confussed as bit depth has no correlation to DR.
If you encode in a linear manner, bit-depth defines the maximum DR that you can encode in the file:
I prefer to call it precision, rather than it-depth. Long before we had digital cameras, we were using the word precision to define the concept.
Agree, precission is a good discription.
 
i have included 3 files 3 stops over exposed 7stop under exposed and my studio work starting point for all my shoots.

10 stop
 
i have included 3 files 3 stops over exposed 7stop under exposed and my studio work starting point for all my shoots.

10 stop
Requires a Microsoft OneDrive account.
 
i will change to uncompressed even though compressed is suppose to be 14 stops on the a7iv. im a bit confussed as bit depth has no correlation to DR.
If you encode in a linear manner, bit-depth defines the maximum DR that you can encode in the file:

https://www.dpreview.com/articles/4...e-not-the-number-of-colors-you-get-to-capture

This isn't true for anything where you've applied a curve to the data first, but in linear Raw, it can act as a limit on how much you can store.

Richard - DPReview.com
FWIW, Jack Hogan and I independently showed that (engineering) dynamic range is limited by quantum noise to about 1/2 stop higher than bit depth. So, for example, 14.5 stops for a 14-bit raw.
 
Last edited:
i have included 3 files 3 stops over exposed 7stop under exposed and my studio work starting point for all my shoots.

10 stop
Requires a Microsoft OneDrive account.
drop box

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/rx4w...ey=mohv0jvmjre25nxby2199yvtp&st=cy2y18do&dl=0

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/yabh...ey=n56wtetml3ivzfvephpqdtmqz&st=ivjydizz&dl=0
this is halarious, dropbox has done a better job of the thumbnail exposure in a single pass than ACR has done over 2 passes 🤨
 
I love fun facts, so i have been useing my a6700 side by side to my a7iv for my pro shoots, the a6700 is really good and very close to the image quality which is great as i now use a 2 camera lens combo, but after my agonising discussion points and multipul testing i have discovered that using lossless compressed raw on the a6700 has brought the image quality even closer to the a7iv useing compressed raw. compressed raw (33meg) on the a7iv has a file size of half that of uncompressed raw (70meg) yet uncompressed raw offers practically no advantage in shadow noise on the a7iv and 1/2 stop on the highlights. but with the a6700 losses compressed raw at 28 meg and compressed at 25 meg the lossless offers a good 1 stop better noise perfomance 😁 im stoked, im going to do some more tests with some selfies now just to confirm the results.
 
i knew the a6700 was good but just did some lifted portrait shadows vers the excelent a7iv and after viewing the same images at 2000% i can say that the noise is exactlly the same , i knew there was some pixy dust there and a certain person told me about that 26meg sensor that the fx30 shared with the a6700.

now im really going to push the sensor on skin tone shadows.
 
Last edited:
i have included 3 files 3 stops over exposed 7stop under exposed and my studio work starting point for all my shoots.

10 stop
Not sure wha the point is, but here are the raw histos.



3d48d4c787d64e5083b7b1b083ee61d7.jpg.png



064405339d1f418192176d931c49560c.jpg.png



--
 
i have included 3 files 3 stops over exposed 7stop under exposed and my studio work starting point for all my shoots.

10 stop
Not sure wha the point is, but here are the raw histos.

3d48d4c787d64e5083b7b1b083ee61d7.jpg.png

064405339d1f418192176d931c49560c.jpg.png
the exercise was to demonstrait the 10 stop range of recoverable DR for my work flow, which also basically matched the same test by just under and over exposing neutral grey, skintone, green grass , ect. the claimed 14/15 stops 🤔🙄
 
i have included 3 files 3 stops over exposed 7stop under exposed and my studio work starting point for all my shoots.

10 stop
Not sure wha the point is, but here are the raw histos.

3d48d4c787d64e5083b7b1b083ee61d7.jpg.png

064405339d1f418192176d931c49560c.jpg.png
the exercise was to demonstrait the 10 stop range of recoverable DR for my work flow, which also basically matched the same test by just under and over exposing neutral grey, skintone, green grass , ect. the claimed 14/15 stops 🤔🙄
I don't see how those shots produce quantitative results.

--
 
Woke up this morning with the puzzel complete. i know where the 14 stops of DR come from. as my 22 yo daughter (science/bioligy, teacher) said to me the other day after a uni class studying medical health science/masters in natropothy , the Lecturers have no idea how to teach complex topics to the students because the are not qualified teachers, so she asked if she could teach the specfic class which the lecturer agreed on in amazment at her ability to comunicate to all levels of academic mindsets. over the years I have noticed no one has actually writen or discussed where the 14 stops of DR are measured from, only after reading a video camera spec sheet from facebook last night it all became apparent while i was sleeping.. Talk about black and white turning into grey 🫣literally 😁 at least i got there in the end from the maze of posts which didnt lead to the finish line 🤪
 
Woke up this morning with the puzzel complete. i know where the 14 stops of DR come from. as my 22 yo daughter (science/bioligy, teacher) said to me the other day after a uni class studying medical health science/masters in natropothy , the Lecturers have no idea how to teach/comunicate complex topics to the students because the are not qualified teachers, so she asked if she could teach the specfic class which the lecturer agreed on in amazment at her ability to comunicate to all levels of academic mindsets. over the years I have noticed no one has actually writen or discussed where the 14 stops of DR are measured from, only after reading a video camera spec sheet from facebook last night it all became apparent while i was sleeping.. Talk about black and white turning into grey 🫣literally 😁 at least i got there in the end from the maze of posts which didnt lead to the finish line 🤪

Marketing 🤔 lets just say, non disclosure works, if they dont ask dont tell them 😊

lets see if anyone can sum up 14 stops DR measument in a single line post 😎
 
Last edited:
lets see if anyone can sum up 14 stops DR measument in a single line post 😎
log2(fullscale/readNoise) at base ISO.

 
Last edited:
lets see if anyone can sum up 14 stops DR measument in a single line post 😎
log2(fullscale/readNoise) at base ISO.

https://blog.kasson.com/gfx-100s-ii/fujifilm-gfx-100s-ii-edr/
slog3 is shorter 🤨

AI: It gives you more dynamic range which makes post processing easier because it's less likely for highlights to be blown out or shadows to be crushed.

no formulas allowed

your answer was compressed to 2 bit jpeg 😁

AI answer.

The expression "log2(full scale / read noise)" at base ISO is a key parameter in understanding and comparing camera noise and dynamic range. It represents the number of "stops" of dynamic range a camera can capture before its image signal is dominated by noise. Essentially, it quantifies how much "clean" signal you have before noise becomes a significant factor.
 
Last edited:
lets see if anyone can sum up 14 stops DR measument in a single line post 😎
log2(fullscale/readNoise) at base ISO.

https://blog.kasson.com/gfx-100s-ii/fujifilm-gfx-100s-ii-edr/
slog3 is shorter 🤨

AI: It gives you more dynamic range which makes post processing easier because it's less likely for highlights to be blown out or shadows to be crushed.

no formulas allowed
Be serious. This is PS&T. Keep up.
your answer was compressed to 2 bit jpeg 😁

AI answer.

The expression "log2(full scale / read noise)" at base ISO is a key parameter in understanding and comparing camera noise and dynamic range. It represents the number of "stops" of dynamic range a camera can capture before its image signal is dominated by noise. Essentially, it quantifies how much "clean" signal you have before noise becomes a significant factor.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top