... stitching for near/far comps? Or, how about moving subjects 'in nature' (waves / fast moving clouds...) Anyone have a good work-around? Here's one where I stitched just two images and had to be rather... 'creative' with the waves... it took a lot more time than I wanted to spend on this and the waves are small... I'd hate to think what it would take to blend large ones from frame to frame.
http://www.jchristophergalleries.com/enlarge.php?id=130
And here is one that took even more time working the sky (three frames blended for HDR, with the clouds... all over the place from image 1 to image 3) and I'm still not happy with how the sky looks
http://www.jchristophergalleries.com/enlarge.php?id=117
Then I have no idea how I might try to stitch together a near/far comp like this:
http://www.jchristophergalleries.com/enlarge.php?id=76
Hmmm. Maybe I do need a D3x after all, even though I can see how stiching D3 frames will produce a ...48MP or larger file of stationary subjects, at some distance.
decisions, decisions...
(btw: all four images taken with the D200)
--
John
http://www.JChristopherGalleries.com
http://www.jchristophergalleries.com/enlarge.php?id=130
And here is one that took even more time working the sky (three frames blended for HDR, with the clouds... all over the place from image 1 to image 3) and I'm still not happy with how the sky looks
http://www.jchristophergalleries.com/enlarge.php?id=117
Then I have no idea how I might try to stitch together a near/far comp like this:
http://www.jchristophergalleries.com/enlarge.php?id=76
Hmmm. Maybe I do need a D3x after all, even though I can see how stiching D3 frames will produce a ...48MP or larger file of stationary subjects, at some distance.
decisions, decisions...
(btw: all four images taken with the D200)
--
John
http://www.JChristopherGalleries.com