abe4652
Veteran Member
Agreed. There are no bad systems and no systems that are extraordinarily compelling.The best method is to not change systems.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Agreed. There are no bad systems and no systems that are extraordinarily compelling.The best method is to not change systems.
I still use lenses and macro equipment that I have had for decades. They work on modern cameras with adapters.As to the loss, you have gotten a certain amount of use and pleasure from the gear - and some earnings if you do any paid work. Hopefully your gear has paid for its depreciation, either in earnings or in enjoyment. If you are not earning money or receiving pleasure from its use what's the point?
As to risk, if you sell online you risk losing money. To some extent you can minimize the risk by selling items separately, insuring your shipments, and, when possible, screening buyers. I buy and sell on ebay several times a year and have been since the service started. I've never had a serious problem but if I keep going long enough it will happen. Life is like that.
If you sell in person to strangers you risk being whacked on the head, or worse. On the whole I'd rather take my chances online.
If you sell to a known dealer, either online or locally, you take a lower price (essentially wholesale) but you minimize the risk.
In my opinion, photography equipment should not be considered a long-term investment. Keep in mind when you buy that it probably will not be around more than 2 or 3 years and think about what value you get from it while it lasts.
Gato
You are buying photographs, not lenses and cameras. An "investment" is the cost of whatever equipment will get you the most good photographs.Good point.I don't think that selling and buying equipment at what is a fair market price can be described as "financial loss". Of course new equipment has a higher fair marker price than used one; thus it cost money to replace old with new. He who perceives such transaction as a "financial loss" should not undertake it.What is the best method to avoid substantial financial loss when changing systems,...
People keep thinking of their equipment as being worth the original price paid.
I had recently purchased that lens for $1200 (originally listed for $1450 - which I felt, and apparently so did the market, was too high) and sold it for $1350 (which I think is fair). After PayPal fees and shipping costs, I actually made $80.Why I'm selling this lens:
This lens was originally purchased from Colonial Photo and Hobby in Orlando. I picked it up (used, here on FM) to evaluate it against the Zeiss Batis 85mm f/1.8 that I've owned for a while and never got around to shooting with the Sony because I just LOVE the Zeiss lens. So, rather than force myself to go through the laborious task of shooting them side by side, evaluating the images, etc., I'm just sticking with the Zeiss.
Condition:
The lens body and glass both appear in perfect shape and the lens functions flawlessly.
Both rings rotate smoothly with no grinding or sticking.
Both switches (AF/MF and "De-Click") have a nice, positive "clicking" feel and sound - just as you'd expect.
The "focus hold" button depresses and clicks just like it should.
There are some slight rub marks around the housing of the lens (NOT on the glass) where the lens hood rotates into place. Assuming you use the lens hood, you'll never even see them and the lens will appear perfect.
The lens hood is in great shape as well and for those who may not know, is lined with felt to absorb stray light rays.
I'd give this lens a 9.8 out of 10 due to the slight rub marks on the housing of the lens I mentioned above.
Included:
The box and lens pouch (which isn't pictured) are included along with both lens caps and the lens hood.
Price & Trades:
$1350 sent via PayPal takes it (this is the price you pay, no need to add anything for shipping, insurance, or PayPal fees - all of that stuff is included in the price). That's about 20% off of the new price and the lens is basically indistinguishable from new. My Sony outfit is 100% complete and figuring out the 85mm focal length was my last task so I'm not currently interested in any trades, except, perhaps, a lifetime supply of Reese's Peanut Butter Cups. Kidding... possibly...
Getting it in your hands:
I ship via USPS Priority mail and insure the full value of the lens (again, included in the price). So, you'll receive the lens 2-3 days after I ship it which is the same day I receive payment if that's at all possible. Please note that the USPS requires a signature for insured packages. If you're not available when delivery is attempted, they'll leave a note which will allow you to drop by your local Post Office and sign for the package as soon as the next day.
If you have any questions or concerns that I haven't answered here, please contact me via PM and I'll get back to you ASAP.
Thanks for looking!
This only holds true for cheap bodies and consumer level lenses. If one is buying higher end stuff, especially high end glass, then not considering it an investment is just plain stupid.In my opinion, photography equipment should not be considered a long-term investment. Keep in mind when you buy that it probably will not be around more than 2 or 3 years and think about what value you get from it while it lasts.
Gato
"Investment" is the word I used.This only holds true for cheap bodies and consumer level lenses. If one is buying higher end stuff, especially high end glass, then not considering it an investment is just plain stupid.In my opinion, photography equipment should not be considered a long-term investment. Keep in mind when you buy that it probably will not be around more than 2 or 3 years and think about what value you get from it while it lasts.
Gato
This is true for the digital equipment, not so much for the analogue equipment (optics). Half a dozen modern high end lenses could run $20k. I don’t know many people who can take that kind of hit on a whim."Investment" is the word I used.This only holds true for cheap bodies and consumer level lenses. If one is buying higher end stuff, especially high end glass, then not considering it an investment is just plain stupid.In my opinion, photography equipment should not be considered a long-term investment. Keep in mind when you buy that it probably will not be around more than 2 or 3 years and think about what value you get from it while it lasts.
Gato
Photography equipment can be a significant investment, but generally not a "long term" investment in the digital era.
It all depreciates, which is why it is stupid to change systems on a whim. The financial hit can be huge.As with any investment you need to think about your return and payback. Will the equipment pay back its cost -- in either money or pleasure -- within a reasonable time? Will it have resale value? How fast will it depreciate (or appreciate)?
In other words, you advocate the Crystal ball and Ouiji Board as decision making tools.How long will it last? How long will the manufacturer support it? How soon will you want an upgrade? Will it still be useful if you switch to a different system?
Maybe if all you buy is disposable bodies and entry level consumer zooms. If you have taken the time to build a quality system comprising a dozen or more lenses and brand specific accessories, it’s probably a better idea to learn to live with the First World Problem of not having a parade of China consumer goods going through your front door.All things we need to think about.
Gato
If you are interested in taking pictures rather than impressing your friends with what you can spend on gear, older lenses can make great photographs.Thanks to all for comments.
I do think that glass can be considered an investment, if one sticks to a major system.
An investment in your photography hobby, but not an investment that you should expect to grow in value.Thanks to all for comments.
I do think that glass can be considered an investment, if one sticks to a major system.
You should have more faith in mankind. I have bought and sold on eBay with my cameras and lenses. Some of them were $2,000+. I had not had anyone claiming I shipped him/her a brick. And I had bought lenses that I am very happy with from eBay. As a matter of fact, I vow that I would probably never buy a piece of new equipment again.With ebay, if the buyer says he received a brick, any money he paid goes right back to him and you are out an expensive camera or lens. Locally, still a hassle, and a big loss. Here on dpreview, still a question of where the risk falls.
Any solutions?
The biggest cost is not that you are changing systems, but that you are going from used gear to new gear. The next factor is the transaction cost. Typically there are costs involved when selling. If you accept credit cards, the card company will take a few percent. If you use eBay, they take a fee. If you use a camera store, they take a much bigger cut.
The way to minimize the cost of the transition is to go "like for like". You're selling gear of a particular age, replace it with similar gear of the same age but from the other system.
If you are selling a body with a used value of $1,000, then buy a used body in the new system that is also valued around $1,000.
Even after the 10% eBay fee and 3% Paypal fee, you're still way ahead. Make sure you take advantage of the discount shipping via USPS and Fedex offered by eBay.As a general rule, the less riskier the transaction, the higher the fees. Selling your gear to a camera store is the most secure and reliable method, and you will get less money. Taking a check from someone you met on the street has the lowest fee, but the highest risk that you will be defrauded.
How much risk are you willing to take?
The more risk you take, the more likely you are to make a sale. A buyer is more likely to trust you if you take a credit card instead of cash. If the camera you are selling is defective, they can complain to the credit card company. This is risky for you as they might complain, even if the camera is perfect.
If you want to minimize risk, Go to a camera store and do some trading.
My advice is that before you make any deals, go on eBay and look at recent sales for the items you want to buy and sell. Ignore the asking price, and ignore listings that don't sell. Actually look at what people are paying for the various items.
No, of course not. Not an investment in the usual meaning of the word.An investment in your photography hobby, but not an investment that you should expect to grow in value.Thanks to all for comments.
I do think that glass can be considered an investment, if one sticks to a major system.