>>>CHALLENGE 38: INANIMATE OBJECTS Official Thread<<<

[MikelF]

I'm recovering from my weekend.

 

[Gayle159626]

........in the eligible gallery that need to be moved to exhibition. At least 2 are outside the challenge dates, and one has no date at all and no camera info.
Could the host please attend to this before the voting booth opens?

Cheers,

Gayle

--

'We don't make a photograph with just a camera. We bring to the act of photography all the books we have read, the movies we have seen, the music we have heard and the people we have loved.' Ansel Adams



http://www.shot2shot.com

 

[MikelF]

Now I get to start two days of teeth grinding.

 

[EOSMan]

--
EOSMan

http://www.pbase.com/eosman

 

[MikelF]

http://www.liteserv.com/cslrvotebooth/index.php

 

[mooseknuckle]

this new policy of finding out at the end about the winner blows. A large part (for me) of the fun of these challenges is the horse-race during the voting. Besides, the times I have won, it was nice having a few days to think up a new challenge theme.

Grant

--
check out my gallery here:
http://www.pbase.com/granthamilton/portfolio

 

[EOSMan]

Now what do we do for the next two days?
Go out and take pictures?

--
EOSMan

http://www.pbase.com/eosman

 

[MikelF]

Now what do we do for the next two days?
Go out and take pictures?

Perish the thought! I plan to mutter darkly about not seeing the progress, and think up challenge topics that I will use some time two or three years from now when I win.

 

[Olaf.dk]

no text

 

[alexeig]

--
Regards

alexeig

http://www.pbase.com/alexeig

 

[Sergio Rojkes]

http://www.liteserv.com/cslrvotebooth/index.php

 

[Sergio Rojkes]

It was out of the challenge date range.

Please, somebody move it out of the elegible voting booth and place it in the Exhibition.
Thanks
Ser

 

[iso3200]

this new policy of finding out at the end about the winner blows.

Worthy as this experiment was, I also don't like it as much. Usually prior to the end of a challenge voting period, I contact the likely winner(s) to help them set things up for a new challenge.

No way of knowing who to email now. Bummer.

Also potential winner has no time to think of a new topic.

Add your love or hate to this thread!

--
iso3200
----------
http://www.isopic.net

 

[Agon]

Are they the time I and Time II ?
for some reason Adbode did not save the EXIF and I only noticed it after upload.
Ayway to "insert" the exif info at this time ?
They were taken with a Canon 20D and a Canon 100mm f2.8 Macro lens.

Jean-Claude

........in the eligible gallery that need to be moved to
exhibition. At least 2 are outside the challenge dates, and one has
no date at all and no camera info.
Could the host please attend to this before the voting booth opens?

Cheers,

Gayle

--
'We don't make a photograph with just a camera. We bring to the act
of photography all the books we have read, the movies we have seen,
the music we have heard and the people we have loved.' Ansel Adams



http://www.shot2shot.com

--

 

[Agon]

opsss just noticed they are not in the eligible section anymore, guess I will have to be more careful next time.

Jean-Claude
--

 

[David Willis]

Must agree that it is def. tough to do without being able to see the results...will be interesting however to see how the voting changes!

Perhaps, if we do decide to keep this rule going, we should give the winner "setup time" rather than try to shuffle them through really quickly...

Cheers,
:-D

 

[Olaf.dk]

this new policy of finding out at the end about the winner blows.

Leave your feedback here!!!!

I know that we are more people who feels the same way. Lonnit for sure, to mention one. Where are you all? How about writing down your opinion on this, while we wait for the ressults? It really is a drag to wait for 48 hours with no feedback whatsoever! Excitement and momentum are lost, IMO.
--
Olaf

 

[PhilMarshall]

I know that we are more people who feels the same way. Lonnit for
sure, to mention one. Where are you all? How about writing down
your opinion on this, while we wait for the ressults? It really is
a drag to wait for 48 hours with no feedback whatsoever! Excitement
and momentum are lost, IMO.
--
Olaf

I've been AWOL for a while, working on some "real" photography which is hopefully going to start paying some money very soon, so I've not submitted any pics for a while.

I have been watching all the discussions though.

Any new system is going to get its critics - the booth wasn't initially popular if you recall, but now the thought of going back to thread-voting wouldn't be well received either.

However, the level of vocal opposition now its been implemented is quite telling - and it is more valuable as feedback than just soliciting opinions to an idea - people are just more likely ot respond once they've seen something in action than they are to an vague notion.

I, for one, did like to see the progress during the voting (if only to see that once again I didn't get any votes!), but others have raised sensible points, such as not being able to "prepare" the likely winner.

The fact that Jack has offered to reinstante the previous version means it's presumably not too much work for him, and I think it needs serious consideration.

If I had to make a choice, I'd say let's go back to the previous way (and I say this understanding 100% why it was changed).

Phil

--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://tot-shots.co.uk

 

[MikelF]

She has spoken in the voting thread, along with a few others.

 

[Sis-Q]

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1019&message=12983379

I wonder if all of this shouldn't take place in the challenge gallery forum. We should hold a conclave and nobody gets out until the needed decisions are made. lol

Cindy

--

My Photo-A-Day for a Year Gallery Here: http://www.pbase.com/cindyd/2005

Formerly half of 1ofUs or 1ofUs!
The other half of 'Us' is now 'Lensbaby'