Canon Extender EF 1.4x III Review -

Marco Nero

Veteran Member
Messages
7,702
Solutions
21
Reaction score
11,444
Location
Sydney, AU

Canon EF 1.4x III Extender

.
CANON's EF 1.4x III Extender is a useful accessory lens if you own (or are contemplating) one of the numerous lenses that it was designed to work with. I'd have liked to have mounted it to an EF 100mmL Macro lens but not all lenses are recessed at the rear to allow an Extender to fit. However, it will fit the 180mm Macro lens. That being said, the Extenders were made to suit telephoto lenses - but be sure to check before purchasing either a lens or an Extender to ensure compatibility. A popular Lens combination with extenders is the 70-200mm f/2.8L lens and I sometimes see people on the beach using this combo with a Canon 7D II to capture surfers on the waves.
.
The Mk III Extenders are superior (construction-wise and Optically) to the earlier Mk II Extenders. There's less barrel distortion as well. They don't affect the Minimum focus distance of lenses and your DSLR camera will calculate exposures correctly with an Extender in place. Most DSLR's will be able to utilize AF at Apertures of f/8 although there are some variations and a lens that is f/2.8 or f/4 will normally have no problems but an f/5.6 lens with an Extender will end up above f/8 and so the the AF will be neutralized on most cameras when it kicks over the f/8 mark. The resulting images. when using an extender - will vary depending on the lens used because each type of lens will have different inherent image quality. A good lens will produce good images with an extender. An excellent lens will produce excellent results. A poor lens (eg soft lens) will produce inferior results.
.
As a property of optical physics, you're going to lose some light by adding an Extender so you won't be able to use the native Aperture range that the lens itself would normally offer. Most Canon DSLR cameras are designed to ignore/deactivate AF and IS with Extenders if certain criteria are met. But the higher end DSLRs will usually allow these functions (eg 1D+, 5D III and 7D MkII ). I was surprised to find that even the Canon EOSM mirrorless cameras allow the use of the Extenders although performance of AF will vary depending on both the camera and the lens used. Using it with an APS-C sensor has the added advantage of offering yet another 1.6x magnification due to the crop factor.
.
First Impressions:
Though I had no interest in using it with this lens, I first tested the extender with the EF 135mm f.2.0L USM lens on the EOSM Mirrorless camera ...and I had mixed results with this combination. The older 135mmL lens is SUPERB on its own. It's one of the most highly regarded Canon lenses. But this lens was somewhat "buggy" with the EOSM. The images had some Purple Fringing (typical of the lens and to be expected) and AF was slightly unpredictable and it was certainly quite slow. I also found the camera would freeze every so often (a property of the EOSM which did not occur using the Extender with other lenses.
.


EOSM + EF 1.4x III Extender + EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM lens.

.
Adding a recent Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM lens to the EOSM produced a superior experience. I had bought the extender to use with the EOS 6D but I was curious to see how it worked with an adapter on the EOSM so I could take advantage of the added increase in focal range with the APS-C crop effect. Note that when using a Full Frame camera like the EOS 6D, the AF won't work unless you switch the camera to Live Preview mode. But it will work on other models like the 5D Mk III (and above) and the 7D Mk II. On the EOSM the Extender slowed down AF considerably. Canon explains that this is to improve AF accuracy and that it's a normal function of the Extender to do so. For shooting astro-photography shots of the Moon or a glorious sunrise, the Extender gave me excellent results. On the 6D the Extender slowed down AF less than it did on the EOSM. I've seen reports from 7D II users that the Extender barely slows the AF at all... which really makes me want to buy a 7D II body now.
.
The PROS:
* Excellent image quality.
* Can be used as a Manual Focus Only tool with compatible lenses.
* Sharper than the EF 2x III extender (which is slightly softer).
* Lightweight and easily carried.
* Matches the stark-White tone of the newer white Canon L-Series lenses.
* Extremely well built.
* More robust (more lock-down assembly screws!) than previous versions.
* Increases the focal length of the lens used by 1.4x
* EF 1.4x III matches the White-tone of the newer L-series lenses.
* Electronic contacts transfer lens information to the camera.
* Image Stabilization still works with compatible lenses.
* In-Camera lens correction recognizes Extender when matched to specific lenses.
.
.
The CONS:
* Not inexpensive.
* Only works with SOME lenses (Telephoto).
* Can no longer be stacked with EF 2x III without a 'spacer'.
* Magnifies any lens flaws.
* Reduces image Contrast.
.
Sticking a 400mm lens on an EF 1.4x Extender and adding an APS-C (1.61x) camera to it will give you an astounding 900mm+ lens at a fraction of the cost of anything in a similar range. The benefit is that you're getting a powerful zoom without the exorbitant costs associated with a dedicated super-telephoto lens. The downside is that your combination will result in less light and smaller apertures... assuming AF and IS isn't shut down by the combo selected. The optical quality of the elements used inside the Extender are absolutely first-class. Technical reviews show these elements to be on par with Canon's best glass.
.


EOSM + EF 1.4x III + EF 100-400mmL II - [JPEG Edited, Cropped and then Reduced in scale]

.
TIPS :
* Stopping a lens down will increase the clarity of the Lens+Extender combo, resulting in slightly sharper and more refined images.
.
* Mark your protective end caps that come fitted to the Extender so that you don't mix them up with those that came with your camera or other lenses etc. Although they look just like the ones that protect and fit your camera (and they look just like the ones that come fitted to your lenses) the FRONT cap is unique. The protective-cap that fits your camera lens-mount ring (to keep the dust off your sensor when shipping) won't fit the Extender. Even though it looks the same. This is because there's an extended inner lens element that protrudes from the Extenders by a few millimeters. The usual cap from any Canon camera won't fit it ...and will fail to lock into place. You'll want to use the original caps that come with the extenders.
.
* You can use an Extender on any compatible lens with ANY type of DSLR camera with an EF mount (or EF adapter) and it's a very common thing to see people using it as a Manual Focus Only tool. If I'm shooting the moon or a landscape, I'll simply use Manual Focus and I'll set it using the Magnify tool built into most Live Preview modes. Even on the EOS 6D I can switch to Live View and use the LCD display to lock focus using the AF.
.
* Mount the Extender to the lens first. Then mount the Lens+Extender combo to your camera. Try not to mount the extender to the camera body and then attach a heavy lens... it's just a precaution to prevent accidents.
.
* Check to see that your lens is compatible with an extender. Most, but not all, telephoto or high-zoom lenses are designed to work with an extender.
.
* Some users have found that you can apply tape to two of the gold-plated EF transfer terminals on the Extender to stop it reporting back to the camera - thus allowing for AF beyond f/8. You can search this technique online for more details but I have chosen not to gum up the components of my lenses by adding adhesive tape.
.
RATING:
The lens Extenders do exactly what they're supposed to do. I'm rating the EF 1.4x III Extender at 4/5 Stars because of the excellence of build and the quality of the images it produces. It's a considerable improvement on the Mk II. I've dropped a star because of the decision by Canon to cripple the AF with some cameras and not others and because the RRP is slightly too high IMO. If you're a wildlife photographer, an astrophotographer or a landscape photographer, this is an invaluable tool. Like a Circular Polarizer, you won't need it all the time - but it makes an enormous difference by magnifying the details in your scene when you use it. Prices have dropped slightly since the extenders were released and I think it's an essential tool for certain subjects. I'm quite happy to own this accessory and I recommend it for others.
.


Canon EOS 6D + EF 1.4x III + EF 100-400mmL II [partial moon with atmosphere distortion]

--
Regards,
Marco Nero.
 
Last edited:
The PROS:
* Excellent image quality.
* Can be used as a Manual Focus Only tool with compatible lenses.
* Sharper than the EF 2x III extender (which is slightly softer).
* Lightweight and easily carried.
* Matches the stark-White tone of the newer white Canon L-Series lenses.
* Extremely well built.
* More robust (more lock-down assembly screws!) than previous versions.
* Increases the focal length of the lens used by 1.4x
* EF 1.4x III matches the White-tone of the newer L-series lenses.
* Electronic contacts transfer lens information to the camera.
* Image Stabilization still works with compatible lenses.
* In-Camera lens correction recognizes Extender when matched to specific lenses.
* With certain recent bodies and lenses, activates more AF points at f/8 than default f/8 coverage. For example, with 100~400 II on 5D Mark IV and 80D. This is a really significant benefit.
.
.
The CONS:
* Not inexpensive.
* Only works with SOME lenses (Telephoto).
* Can no longer be stacked with EF 2x III without a 'spacer'.
This is not the fault of the 1.4× III but of the 2× III. You can stack the 1.4× III with the 2× II.
* Magnifies any lens flaws.
* Reduces image Contrast.
 
The PROS:
* Excellent image quality.
* Can be used as a Manual Focus Only tool with compatible lenses.
* Sharper than the EF 2x III extender (which is slightly softer).
* Lightweight and easily carried.
* Matches the stark-White tone of the newer white Canon L-Series lenses.
* Extremely well built.
* More robust (more lock-down assembly screws!) than previous versions.
* Increases the focal length of the lens used by 1.4x
* EF 1.4x III matches the White-tone of the newer L-series lenses.
* Electronic contacts transfer lens information to the camera.
* Image Stabilization still works with compatible lenses.
* In-Camera lens correction recognizes Extender when matched to specific lenses.
* With certain recent bodies and lenses, activates more AF points at f/8 than default f/8 coverage. For example, with 100~400 II on 5D Mark IV and 80D. This is a really significant benefit.
That's correct - I missed that one. Thanks for adding. It's a very important Pro.
.
.
The CONS:
* Not inexpensive.
* Only works with SOME lenses (Telephoto).
* Can no longer be stacked with EF 2x III without a 'spacer'.
This is not the fault of the 1.4× III but of the 2× III. You can stack the 1.4× III with the 2× II.
You can - and they ought to fit... but the EF 2x Mk II has noticeably inferior optical quality compared to the EF 2x Mk III... so I'm not sure why anyone would want to do this. I'm tempted to buy the 2x III and was just looking at one today. I probably Just need something to motivate me to drop the cash.
 
.
.
The CONS:
* Not inexpensive.
* Only works with SOME lenses (Telephoto).
* Can no longer be stacked with EF 2x III without a 'spacer'.
This is not the fault of the 1.4× III but of the 2× III. You can stack the 1.4× III with the 2× II.
You can - and they ought to fit... but the EF 2x Mk II has noticeably inferior optical quality compared to the EF 2x Mk III... so I'm not sure why anyone would want to do this. I'm tempted to buy the 2x III and was just looking at one today. I probably Just need something to motivate me to drop the cash.
 
The 2× Extenders have always been a bit marginal, apparently working best with the Big White Lenses, and tests suggest that there has indeed been an IQ improvement from each version to the next. Your incentive for buying the 2× III is that it takes f/8 AF coverage above the default with the 200~400/4. What? You don't have one of those yet?
I'd like one... even if it's just there for occasional use (2x) but I'd actually like a 200-400/f4L - it's likely to be the next lens I buy. I think your observation on the Extenders working best with the larger White lenses is probably spot-on. Those lenses tend to produce excellent results to begin with. I'm using the 100-400mmL II as a substitute for a (better) telescope at the moment and I'd eventually like to strap it to a tracked mount so I can do longer exposures of celestial subjects.
.
But the reason I'd like the EF 2x III lens is more for lunar shots. I like the results from a cropped sensor camera but I'd like to use a FF camera with a little more magnification that the 2x might offer. I've only heard of three people speaking kindly of the 2x III extenders, hence my hesitation. Nearly everyone I knew who used a Mk II was a little disappointed with the results and that's the reason I changed my mind at the last moment and bought the 1.4x III instead. Now I'm becoming swayed back towards the 2x for the added magnification. I guess if you need it, you just have to get it (eventually)! I have a Canon ET EF 12 Extension Tube that I can use to mount the two together but it's quite a shame Canon ended the ability to stack these. I guess using two is going to reduce image quality further. Either way, I'm happy with the image quality from the EF 1.4x III.

--
Regards,
Marco Nero.
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
Taken in JPEG with the following combination this week:

Canon EOS-M mirrorless camera. (APS-C).
Canon EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS II USM lens (@ 400mm)
Canon EF 1.4x III Extender.
.
I had to drag Jupiter a litter close to the moon because it was just out of frame at the time. Some editing in Photoshop (highlights and very minor sharpening + contrast). In the closeup (which was enlarged to 200%) you can make out the banding on Jupiter and three of its moons.
.


The moon with Jupiter (slightly cropped and recomposed)


A 200% crop showing Jupiter from the first shot. You can just make out three of the moons

.
I was surprised to capture this much information and "detail" with a 400mm lens. But I don't believe I'd have resolved these details without the 1.4x Extender coupled with the 1.6x enlargement that the crop-factor on the EOS-M's APS-C sized sensor offered me. I manually focused the lens using the stars nearby. The addition of an extender certainly improves/increases the amount of information captured by the lens used.
.
I really want to try my hand with the extender on the beach to photograph surfers - but we've had quite a bad week of stormy weather so far.
--
Regards,
Marco Nero.
 

Attachments

  • 3591717.jpg
    3591717.jpg
    195.3 KB · Views: 0
  • 3591771.jpg
    3591771.jpg
    41.6 KB · Views: 0
" I've dropped a star because of the decision by Canon to cripple the AF with some cameras and not others and because the RRP is slightly too high IMO."

You down-rated the *extender* because of physical limitations on lower-end Canon *cameras*. I realize this is because you don't understand the limits of AF modules, but the down-rating is not a fault of the extender.
 
RATING:
The lens Extenders do exactly what they're supposed to do. I'm rating the EF 1.4x III Extender at 4/5 Stars because of the excellence of build and the quality of the images it produces. It's a considerable improvement on the Mk II. I've dropped a star because of the decision by Canon to cripple the AF with some cameras and not others and because the RRP is slightly too high IMO. I
.

--
Regards,
Marco Nero.
Thanks Marco

I do not know how many stars it should be given to this extender. I just know that I use it a lot with 7D Mark II + 100-400 II for BIF and like the image quality I get. I wish that I could use some other AF points in addition to the center point/four surrounding points.
 
I recently acquired both the 100-400 mk II and the 1.4 Mk III extender for my EOS 7d mk II. I do have a slight preference for the IQ of the lens without the extender, but when I need the extra reach and the light is good, the extender is a welcome asset. This was shot yesterday when this group of Sandhill Cranes caught me by surprise as I was driving to a local park. I didn't have time to do much more than stop the car and roll down the passenger window. Fortunately the 100-400 and the 1.4 were already mounted on the camera. Shot hand held from the driver's seat, shooting out the rolled down passenger window. 100% crop.



796a0d56848a47649cd02f630389ac10.jpg



--
My life is a circle of confusion - photography is my meditation.
 
This was not shat at 1/10000 of a second.

1/2500 at f/8.0, ISO 400, 560mm
 
" I've dropped a star because of the decision by Canon to cripple the AF with some cameras and not others and because the RRP is slightly too high IMO."

You down-rated the *extender* because of physical limitations on lower-end Canon *cameras*. I realize this is because you don't understand the limits of AF modules, but the down-rating is not a fault of the extender.
Not at all. It's not because of the limitations of "lower end cameras" but because of Canon's conscious decision to cripple the use of this adapter on some cameras but not others. The fact that some users have reported success... having taped over the contacts to prevent the Extender from reporting back to the camera... proves they can be used on models that it was not intended to be used for. I mounted one to a telescope last night and though the shot was framed and the camera instructed to "release shutter without a lens present", the Extender kept telling the camera to shut off.
.
The general consensus from experienced photographers is that "Canon intentionally cripples the use of extenders" - presumably to influence camera migration to higher-end models. Feel free to conduct your own online research and you'll find that my opinion on this matter is repeated by many others. Having been a licensed Canon dealer years ago, I can assure you that this comes as no surprise to me. The punishment of withholding a star because Canon shrewdly chose to penalize anyone without a Pro-Camera (yes, Canon only make ONE model of Pro camera) seems entirely fair to me.
 
Thanks for the review.

"* Mark your protective end caps that come fitted to the Extender so that you don't mix them up with those that came with your camera or other lenses etc. Although they look just like the ones that protect and fit your camera (and they look just like the ones that come fitted to your lenses) the FRONT cap is unique. The protective-cap that fits your camera lens-mount ring (to keep the dust off your sensor when shipping) won't fit the Extender. Even though it looks the same."

I did not know this until you mentioned it. Thanks

Just bought one to go with 100-400mm II. The II was not good and I sold it and lost interest of the extender until now. If I compare with the one taken without the 1.4xIII, I can see some lose of IQ, but acceptable. I only use it when needed of course, most likely on a single object (a bird for example). So I care more on the IQ at the center. Overall, the auto focus on 5DIII is pretty fast, the IQ is very good.

Here are my unscientific tests :

 
Not at all. It's not because of the limitations of "lower end cameras" but because of Canon's conscious decision to cripple the use of this adapter on some cameras but not others. The fact that some users have reported success... having taped over the contacts to prevent the Extender from reporting back to the camera... proves they can be used on models that it was not intended to be used for. I mounted one to a telescope last night and though the shot was framed and the camera instructed to "release shutter without a lens present", the Extender kept telling the camera to shut off.
.
The general consensus from experienced photographers is that "Canon intentionally cripples the use of extenders" - presumably to influence camera migration to higher-end models. Feel free to conduct your own online research and you'll find that my opinion on this matter is repeated by many others. Having been a licensed Canon dealer years ago, I can assure you that this comes as no surprise to me. The punishment of withholding a star because Canon shrewdly chose to penalize anyone without a Pro-Camera (yes, Canon only make ONE model of Pro camera) seems entirely fair to me.

--
"some users have reported success" (and many more have reported failures most of the time).

"general consensus from experienced photo..." (all of whom are not camera engineers).

"Having been a licensed Canon dealer years ago, I can assure you that this comes as no surprise to me." (what does being a saleman have to do with your 'knowledge' of a complex system?)

The limitations of AF at apertures of f8 are well-known. You are deliberately ignoring those, because 'you want it!!!'.
 
Not at all. It's not because of the limitations of "lower end cameras" but because of Canon's conscious decision to cripple the use of this adapter on some cameras but not others. The fact that some users have reported success... having taped over the contacts to prevent the Extender from reporting back to the camera... proves they can be used on models that it was not intended to be used for. I mounted one to a telescope last night and though the shot was framed and the camera instructed to "release shutter without a lens present", the Extender kept telling the camera to shut off.
.
The general consensus from experienced photographers is that "Canon intentionally cripples the use of extenders" - presumably to influence camera migration to higher-end models. Feel free to conduct your own online research and you'll find that my opinion on this matter is repeated by many others. Having been a licensed Canon dealer years ago, I can assure you that this comes as no surprise to me. The punishment of withholding a star because Canon shrewdly chose to penalize anyone without a Pro-Camera (yes, Canon only make ONE model of Pro camera) seems entirely fair to me.
"some users have reported success" (and many more have reported failures most of the time).

"general consensus from experienced photo..." (all of whom are not camera engineers).

"Having been a licensed Canon dealer years ago, I can assure you that this comes as no surprise to me." (what does being a saleman have to do with your 'knowledge' of a complex system?)

The limitations of AF at apertures of f8 are well-known. You are deliberately ignoring those, because 'you want it!!!'.
Two different perspectives but both are valid. If the people get the lens to focus with the tape on and not with it off then this implies that the extender is impeding something that can work. That doesn't mean it is reliable, true, false or a deliberate limitation. It does however add weight to the argument. Some reliable test data with results is needed. The point is you're both right.
 
Hi Marco,

I just bought a 100-400 lens with a 1.4x extender, and am looking forward to some astronomical shots with this combo. I just about captured the rings of Saturn with my Canon 70-300L last year, so hoping to better that this year. I googled 'moon 400mm teleconverter aps-c', and your post here was one of the top results. I love these shots of yours, especially the detail on Jupiter and its moons. Great stuff!

All the best, Keri
 
You also get more AF points at F8 e.g. with 100-400 II on 5D IV etc.
 
Hi Marco,

I just bought a 100-400 lens with a 1.4x extender, and am looking forward to some astronomical shots with this combo. I just about captured the rings of Saturn with my Canon 70-300L last year, so hoping to better that this year. I googled 'moon 400mm teleconverter aps-c', and your post here was one of the top results. I love these shots of yours, especially the detail on Jupiter and its moons. Great stuff!

All the best, Keri
Hello Keri. I'm sorry it took a few days but I only just saw your post. You should be well served by that lens combination. Though if you have the Mk 1 verision of this lens and the Mk 1 version of the 1.4x extender, the results may be softer than what I am getting with the Mk2 lens and the Mk III Extender combo. Canon made some refinements to the Mk2 lens and the Mk III Extenders that enables them to produce slightly sharper results. Even with the Extenders on this lens, the planets like Saturn and Jupiter are still fairly small in the frame.
.


EOS M6 + EF 100-400mmL II lens @ 400mm + CPL filter (slightly cropped). Be sure not to use the OVF for this. The sun still emits powerful light and UV light as well. It's also risky to subject your sensor to that type of light. But when the sun it setting and is dim on the horizon, I'll only take a shot like this with the LCD Live View.


EOS M6 + EF 100-400mmL II lens @ 400mm + CPL filter.Be sure not to use the OVF for this. The sun was dim because of the bushfire smoke here.

.


EOS M6 + EF 100-400mmL II (uncropped) @ 100mm (shot before the image below)


EOS M6 + EF 100-400mmL II (cropped) @ 400mm (shot after the image above)


EOS 6D + EF 100-40mmL II lens + EF 2x III Extender (image has been slightly cropped)The moon is orange from the Australian Bushfires and the smoke they produced.

.
I photographed Saturn last year using the EF 100-400mmL II lens and the two Mk II Extenders during occultation in August 2019. Note that using an APS-C sensor gives us a 1.61x magnification (equiv) compared to Full Frame which gives is more light to play with but no additional crop. I added the EF 1.4x III Extender and the EF 2x III Extenders. An EF12 Extender Tube was used to enable me to mount both Extenders back to back. It acted as a spacer. I then used the edge of the moon that was slipping into shadow (which showed craters)
.


Live View on the EOS M6 LCD display (no magnification) - waiting for occultation


Saturn in the Blue Sky around sunset - approaching the moon before occultation


Closeup (CROPPED Significantly) of Saturn passing behind the moon.


Saturn disappearing behind the moon


Uncropped - Saturn reappearing from behind the moon.


Saturn on the LCD - 10x magnification


A view from the camera with a Video Still (two blended images - one for lunar detail) - In this shot, Saturn has reappeared from behind the moon during occultation.

.
I note that without using any extenders, the aperture on this lens remains a constant f/4.5-5.6 and that means it would likely perform like the large refactor telescopes with 400mm focal lengths. Those scopes are usually well made with field-flatteners etc but with a tripod mount that has EQ tracking on it, you ought to be able to capture some amazing shots of other deep sky imaging subjects.
.
Despite me using the 2x III Extender in some of the shots above, the 1.4x III still gives me slightly crisper results with a lot more light to play with, regardless of the camera. This means a lower ISO can be used and you can blow up your image slightly if you want, without noticeable IQ degradation. I almost bought a dedicated telescope recently for planetary photography but I'm now aiming at one of those Astrograph Primes designed for digital photography rather than direct observation. I might start with an EQ mount tripod of reasonable quality to try out with the EF 100-400mmL II lens to see what I can get at 400mm with tracking.

--
Regards,
Marco Nero.
 

Attachments

  • 3963179.jpg
    3963179.jpg
    140.4 KB · Views: 0
  • 3963177.jpg
    3963177.jpg
    440 KB · Views: 0
  • 3963176.jpg
    3963176.jpg
    534 KB · Views: 0
  • 3963175.jpg
    3963175.jpg
    215.3 KB · Views: 0
  • 3963174.jpg
    3963174.jpg
    340.9 KB · Views: 0
  • 3963181.jpg
    3963181.jpg
    245.1 KB · Views: 0
  • 4001366.jpg
    4001366.jpg
    136.1 KB · Views: 0
  • 3878504.jpg
    3878504.jpg
    454.7 KB · Views: 0
  • 3878670.jpg
    3878670.jpg
    532.9 KB · Views: 0
  • 4001842.jpg
    4001842.jpg
    188.2 KB · Views: 0
  • 4001384.jpg
    4001384.jpg
    402.5 KB · Views: 0
  • 3963180.jpg
    3963180.jpg
    161.7 KB · Views: 0
Nice moon shots
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top