Do we ever need to upload a cat picture again?

According to CNN, in 2015, there might have been 6.5 billion cat pictures uploaded to the Internet. They didn't specify if this was unique cat photos, and they actually projected this number from earlier data in 2010. If we did the same extrapolation there may be 24 billion cat photos on the Internet right now. So that begs the question, do we ever need to upload another cat photo? Maybe the best thing would be to curate the cat photos that are already online, surely we have covered all our cat bases by now?
There can't be enough cat photos! I don't have a cat but I like these animals.
I beg to differ. Assuming you could spend 10 hours of your day looking at cat photos, and spent one seconds per photo (say on a auto slide show) we are taking about 36,000 photos a day or for the fist billion at about 7.6 years to watch the first billion and for 10 billion 76 years to watch. And by that time even more cat photos will have been produced.
So what if there's 4.2 bazillion cat pictures? Somebody gets a new pet, many of them want to take pictures of their new pet. They don't give a rat's behind how many pictures of cats have been taken and posted and they couldn't care less about what other people think, which is a good thing.

So snap away, cat people and post them. It does nothing to hurt you or me or any other person.


David
 
Sure. There's no natural or practical limit to how many cat photos can be posted.

Last week I was walking along a local path that a bunch of houses backed onto. It was a stormy kind of day. I saw a cat on top of a shed near the path and snapped a photo with my phone. The original was hopelessly underexposed due to strong backlighting. While walking I played with it using Snapseed, just pushing it to extremes for a bit of fun.

I sent the photo to my cat-loving wife who posted it in an international cat group. It got a crazy number of likes and adoring comments.

I am just a hobbyist who takes photos for fun. I have no pretensions of ever selling my work or calling myself an artist. If one of my photos, regardless of its merits from a purist's perspective, gives a couple of thousand people a moment's pleasure - brings a smile to their face - I'm content with that.

70eac69ff9fc4d3eaaf3b81ea4fe9c90.jpg

--
All lies and jests; Still a man hears what he wants to hear; And disregards the rest
 
Last edited:
According to CNN, in 2015, there might have been 6.5 billion cat pictures uploaded to the Internet. They didn't specify if this was unique cat photos, and they actually projected this number from earlier data in 2010. If we did the same extrapolation there may be 24 billion cat photos on the Internet right now. So that begs the question, do we ever need to upload another cat photo? Maybe the best thing would be to curate the cat photos that are already online, surely we have covered all our cat bases by now?
"begging the question or assuming the conclusion is an informal fallacy that occurs when an argument's premises assume the truth of the conclusion, instead of supporting it."
 
People take a lot of pix of their pets, because they seem them as beautiful animals who are also family members. They're also always-available, cooperative subjects.

What occurred to me is that if more people had snakes, then snake photos would be more popular. In their own way, they are just as beautiful as cats or dogs; even if they don't show affection.

How about turtles? Fish?

My girlfriend has one fish left. The rest all died. I think they were taking too good care of them. She has neglected this one, except to keep his water in his bowl topped off and to feed him, and he is a grand old daddy now. She calls him Fish of Steel. It reminds me that I need to get a nice shot of him before he goes belly-up. We will remember him fondly.
 
According to CNN, in 2015, there might have been 6.5 billion cat pictures uploaded to the Internet. They didn't specify if this was unique cat photos, and they actually projected this number from earlier data in 2010. If we did the same extrapolation there may be 24 billion cat photos on the Internet right now. So that begs the question, do we ever need to upload another cat photo? Maybe the best thing would be to curate the cat photos that are already online, surely we have covered all our cat bases by now?
There can't be enough cat photos! I don't have a cat but I like these animals.
I beg to differ. Assuming you could spend 10 hours of your day looking at cat photos, and spent one seconds per photo (say on a auto slide show) we are taking about 36,000 photos a day or for the fist billion at about 7.6 years to watch the first billion and for 10 billion 76 years to watch. And by that time even more cat photos will have been produced.
So what if there's 4.2 bazillion cat pictures? Somebody gets a new pet, many of them want to take pictures of their new pet. They don't give a rat's behind how many pictures of cats have been taken and posted and they couldn't care less about what other people think, which is a good thing.

So snap away, cat people and post them. It does nothing to hurt you or me or any other person.

David
Ya sure it does hurt others but liberty wins.
 
According to CNN, in 2015, there might have been 6.5 billion cat pictures uploaded to the Internet. They didn't specify if this was unique cat photos, and they actually projected this number from earlier data in 2010. If we did the same extrapolation there may be 24 billion cat photos on the Internet right now. So that begs the question, do we ever need to upload another cat photo? Maybe the best thing would be to curate the cat photos that are already online, surely we have covered all our cat bases by now?
There can't be enough cat photos! I don't have a cat but I like these animals.
I beg to differ. Assuming you could spend 10 hours of your day looking at cat photos, and spent one seconds per photo (say on a auto slide show) we are taking about 36,000 photos a day or for the fist billion at about 7.6 years to watch the first billion and for 10 billion 76 years to watch. And by that time even more cat photos will have been produced.
So what if there's 4.2 bazillion cat pictures? Somebody gets a new pet, many of them want to take pictures of their new pet. They don't give a rat's behind how many pictures of cats have been taken and posted and they couldn't care less about what other people think, which is a good thing.

So snap away, cat people and post them. It does nothing to hurt you or me or any other person.

David
Ya sure it does hurt others but liberty wins.
OK, I'll bite. How does it hurt anyone?
 
There is nothing on this earth that hasn't been photographed better by someone else already. Maybe we should all just throw our cameras in the trash.
you are wrong you shoot a picture at a specific time, an image is a reflection of time.

you should toss the camera in big empty box for the cat to play with it.
 
According to CNN, in 2015, there might have been 6.5 billion cat pictures uploaded to the Internet. They didn't specify if this was unique cat photos, and they actually projected this number from earlier data in 2010. If we did the same extrapolation there may be 24 billion cat photos on the Internet right now. So that begs the question, do we ever need to upload another cat photo? Maybe the best thing would be to curate the cat photos that are already online, surely we have covered all our cat bases by now?
Admittedly a rather lousy one, a bit misfocused, from some early focusing exercises with a manual Vivitar 200/3.0 lens on an Oly 520, in 2009. :-D



c51feb6c13c24934a5f06a2ca21a121e.jpg

Liewenberger
 
According to CNN, in 2015, there might have been 6.5 billion cat pictures uploaded to the Internet. They didn't specify if this was unique cat photos, and they actually projected this number from earlier data in 2010. If we did the same extrapolation there may be 24 billion cat photos on the Internet right now. So that begs the question, do we ever need to upload another cat photo? Maybe the best thing would be to curate the cat photos that are already online, surely we have covered all our cat bases by now?
Admittedly a rather lousy one, a bit misfocused, from some early focusing exercises with a manual Vivitar 200/3.0 lens on an Oly 520, in 2009. :-D

c51feb6c13c24934a5f06a2ca21a121e.jpg

Liewenberger
It is kind of sinister and threatening - I love it!

--
All lies and jests; Still a man hears what he wants to hear; And disregards the rest
 
According to CNN, in 2015, there might have been 6.5 billion cat pictures uploaded to the Internet. They didn't specify if this was unique cat photos, and they actually projected this number from earlier data in 2010. If we did the same extrapolation there may be 24 billion cat photos on the Internet right now. So that begs the question, do we ever need to upload another cat photo? Maybe the best thing would be to curate the cat photos that are already online, surely we have covered all our cat bases by now?
There can't be enough cat photos! I don't have a cat but I like these animals.
I beg to differ. Assuming you could spend 10 hours of your day looking at cat photos, and spent one seconds per photo (say on a auto slide show) we are taking about 36,000 photos a day or for the fist billion at about 7.6 years to watch the first billion and for 10 billion 76 years to watch. And by that time even more cat photos will have been produced.
So what if there's 4.2 bazillion cat pictures? Somebody gets a new pet, many of them want to take pictures of their new pet. They don't give a rat's behind how many pictures of cats have been taken and posted and they couldn't care less about what other people think, which is a good thing.

So snap away, cat people and post them. It does nothing to hurt you or me or any other person.

David
Ya sure it does hurt others but liberty wins.
OK, I'll bite. How does it hurt anyone?
There are about 100 issues of cat photos hurting others, but in one of the top 50 is the climate change issue of which cat videos are a major problem :

 
Ya sure it does hurt others but liberty wins.
OK, I'll bite. How does it hurt anyone?
There are about 100 issues of cat photos hurting others, but in one of the top 50 is the climate change issue of which cat videos are a major problem :

https://ourworld.unu.edu/en/how-viral-cat-videos-are-warming-the-planet
That's not really apples to apples comparison. Fetching and viewing a typical cat video consumes massively more resources than a typical cat photo and this thread is about photos.

Just for comparison, my typical cat photos from a the time we had cats have been resized to Web / social media - friendly resolution, taking a few hundred kilobytes of space. A random popular cat video I fetched from the Internet takes up a bit more than a hundred megabytes of space, so literally hundreds of times more.
 
Last edited:
According to CNN, in 2015, there might have been 6.5 billion cat pictures uploaded to the Internet. They didn't specify if this was unique cat photos, and they actually projected this number from earlier data in 2010. If we did the same extrapolation there may be 24 billion cat photos on the Internet right now. So that begs the question, do we ever need to upload another cat photo? Maybe the best thing would be to curate the cat photos that are already online, surely we have covered all our cat bases by now?
There can't be enough cat photos! I don't have a cat but I like these animals.
I beg to differ. Assuming you could spend 10 hours of your day looking at cat photos, and spent one seconds per photo (say on a auto slide show) we are taking about 36,000 photos a day or for the fist billion at about 7.6 years to watch the first billion and for 10 billion 76 years to watch. And by that time even more cat photos will have been produced.
So what if there's 4.2 bazillion cat pictures? Somebody gets a new pet, many of them want to take pictures of their new pet. They don't give a rat's behind how many pictures of cats have been taken and posted and they couldn't care less about what other people think, which is a good thing.

So snap away, cat people and post them. It does nothing to hurt you or me or any other person.

David
Ya sure it does hurt others but liberty wins.
OK, I'll bite. How does it hurt anyone?
There are about 100 issues of cat photos hurting others, but in one of the top 50 is the climate change issue of which cat videos are a major problem :

https://ourworld.unu.edu/en/how-viral-cat-videos-are-warming-the-planet
Hmmm... And what percentage of all internet activity is the watching of cat videos? Sorry if I missed it on the article, which didn't appear to mention cat videos other than in the headline.
 
According to CNN, in 2015, there might have been 6.5 billion cat pictures uploaded to the Internet. They didn't specify if this was unique cat photos, and they actually projected this number from earlier data in 2010. If we did the same extrapolation there may be 24 billion cat photos on the Internet right now. So that begs the question, do we ever need to upload another cat photo? Maybe the best thing would be to curate the cat photos that are already online, surely we have covered all our cat bases by now?
There can't be enough cat photos! I don't have a cat but I like these animals.
I beg to differ. Assuming you could spend 10 hours of your day looking at cat photos, and spent one seconds per photo (say on a auto slide show) we are taking about 36,000 photos a day or for the fist billion at about 7.6 years to watch the first billion and for 10 billion 76 years to watch. And by that time even more cat photos will have been produced.
If it's no matter what cat I see, you are right.

If people share here their cat photos they share more than just a cat photo - they share the photo of a creature that lives with them every day, something that is closely related to their own person.

I am at dpreview since many years - most often at the Pentax forum. I spend a lot of time here and thus, I spend a lot of time with people - and with some of them since a very long time. We know almost nothing from each other. However, if we share something private there is a little link. For this reason a cat photo from a person I spend a lot of time with is not just a cat photo - it is more.
 
And I bet there are many, many more!
 
According to CNN, in 2015, there might have been 6.5 billion cat pictures uploaded to the Internet. They didn't specify if this was unique cat photos, and they actually projected this number from earlier data in 2010. If we did the same extrapolation there may be 24 billion cat photos on the Internet right now. So that begs the question, do we ever need to upload another cat photo? Maybe the best thing would be to curate the cat photos that are already online, surely we have covered all our cat bases by now?
Admittedly a rather lousy one, a bit misfocused, from some early focusing exercises with a manual Vivitar 200/3.0 lens on an Oly 520, in 2009. :-D

c51feb6c13c24934a5f06a2ca21a121e.jpg

Liewenberger
It is kind of sinister and threatening - I love it!
Yes, a bit like "Achtung, Big Brother is watching you!" :-D

This cat used to spend quite some time there, hiding behind the little Narcissus ('Osterglocken' in German, 'Easter bells'), as right next to the little flowers was an old tree stump on which I used to put sunflower seeds for the birds. But I've never seen her actually getting a bird!



48b05fb93ab7422ba7ef3291cd65a1c0.jpg



8f7183c397084f7b969b8faf21300062.jpg

Or this cat simply loved flowers, who knows! After the Osterglocken, she liked to rest inmidst the Veilchen (Violets):



612e79c2d491414faac77944ac1d6a67.jpg



cd36ac8e3f5a42ee95143a584cabe0bc.jpg

Liewenberger
 
According to CNN, in 2015, there might have been 6.5 billion cat pictures uploaded to the Internet. They didn't specify if this was unique cat photos, and they actually projected this number from earlier data in 2010. If we did the same extrapolation there may be 24 billion cat photos on the Internet right now. So that begs the question, do we ever need to upload another cat photo? Maybe the best thing would be to curate the cat photos that are already online, surely we have covered all our cat bases by now?
There can't be enough cat photos! I don't have a cat but I like these animals.
I beg to differ. Assuming you could spend 10 hours of your day looking at cat photos, and spent one seconds per photo (say on a auto slide show) we are taking about 36,000 photos a day or for the fist billion at about 7.6 years to watch the first billion and for 10 billion 76 years to watch. And by that time even more cat photos will have been produced.
If it's no matter what cat I see, you are right.

If people share here their cat photos they share more than just a cat photo - they share the photo of a creature that lives with them every day, something that is closely related to their own person.

I am at dpreview since many years - most often at the Pentax forum. I spend a lot of time here and thus, I spend a lot of time with people - and with some of them since a very long time. We know almost nothing from each other. However, if we share something private there is a little link. For this reason a cat photo from a person I spend a lot of time with is not just a cat photo - it is more.
I wont disagree. There is a difference to a general shared to the world to something personal. I mean mothers make lunch for their children by this time trillions of times over history and the number will grow to the end of humanity - who knows perhaps to a google plex. Will we write history books bout each case? No. But each individual case is for important in its own context.

For us to think we need to forget . . .

 
The question is not whether we have to, but whether we can abstain from doing it.

Once you start doing it, you can't stop.

Cats are like pokemons, gotta catch'em all.

PS: my images are not the "cute cat in a basket" type of cat photos. There is a right way and a wrong way of doing this.

 
two more from me :D

atop the kitchen cupboard
atop the kitchen cupboard

mischievous
mischievous

--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Knew very little about photography when I decided to buy the awesome Nikon D70; learned quickly that this expensive camera didn't make me a good photographer.
 
Those are cool!
 
two more from me :D

atop the kitchen cupboard
atop the kitchen cupboard

mischievous
mischievous
The funny part of this post is that the OP complains about why there are so many cat pictures, then some respondent uploads cat pictures to the same thread, and it delights the readers and gets a bunch of likes.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top