Canon R6 Build Quality

Just received the R6 but a little underwhelmed with the build quality compared to my 5D MKIV.

Not that its bad, its just feels a similar quality to the APS range.

For 2.5k it doesn't feel that substantial, but then again maybe it doesn't need to?

Interesting to hear owners views.

I assume the R5 has a more substantial feel?

Cheers

Jet Fuel
Don't worry, the R6 still has a decent (but very lightweight) Magnesium Alloy frame beneath those Polycarbonate panels. If you should add the BG-R10 grip extender, the resulting heft is considerable but the balance with heavier lenses is better. The new mirrorless designs are lighter than before and the Polycarbonate panels can handle greater impacts and are less reactive to thermal differences than all-metal frame cameras. From memory, Polycarbonate materials can resist a shotgun blast at around 20 feet (which is ideal for photojournalists). There's still a fair bit of metal above the outer panels on the R6. I'm watching how scratch-resistant it is after that R5 reviewer noted hard wear on the rear edges of his camera ... and so far I've not seen a mark on mine - as of yet. I noticed no dew forming on my R6 when in the cold night air with long exposures...and encountered no painful overheating of the outer shell in the harsh Australian sun last week.
.

The EOS R6 Magnesium Alloy Frame
The EOS R6 Magnesium Alloy Frame
that image is from the Canon R5, as it's only published under the R5's canon page. The R6 has magnesium parts but doesn't have a complete magnesium body frame like the R5.
Funny Valentine

Thank you for observing that error.

I had thought the Magnesium body/frame looked too similar to the R5 so I was confuse and surprised at how large the metal of the R6 frame was in this image. Metal is better for higher power electronics and achieving better cooling. The poly carbonate cases can very rugged and have better shock suppression than metal cases. Rugged cases must be good for comfortable grip feel, good shock suppression and cooling all at the same time. All of my Canon DSLRs have been very ruggedly packaged and I have had both metal and polycarbonate cased Canon camera bodies.
 
Just received the R6 but a little underwhelmed with the build quality compared to my 5D MKIV.

Not that its bad, its just feels a similar quality to the APS range.

For 2.5k it doesn't feel that substantial, but then again maybe it doesn't need to?

Interesting to hear owners views.

I assume the R5 has a more substantial feel?

Cheers

Jet Fuel
Don't worry, the R6 still has a decent (but very lightweight) Magnesium Alloy frame beneath those Polycarbonate panels. If you should add the BG-R10 grip extender, the resulting heft is considerable but the balance with heavier lenses is better. The new mirrorless designs are lighter than before and the Polycarbonate panels can handle greater impacts and are less reactive to thermal differences than all-metal frame cameras. From memory, Polycarbonate materials can resist a shotgun blast at around 20 feet (which is ideal for photojournalists). There's still a fair bit of metal above the outer panels on the R6. I'm watching how scratch-resistant it is after that R5 reviewer noted hard wear on the rear edges of his camera ... and so far I've not seen a mark on mine - as of yet. I noticed no dew forming on my R6 when in the cold night air with long exposures...and encountered no painful overheating of the outer shell in the harsh Australian sun last week.
.

The EOS R6 Magnesium Alloy Frame
The EOS R6 Magnesium Alloy Frame
that image is from the Canon R5, as it's only published under the R5's canon page. The R6 has magnesium parts but doesn't have a complete magnesium body frame like the R5.
Funny Valentine

Thank you for observing that error.

I had thought the Magnesium body/frame looked too similar to the R5 so I was confuse and surprised at how large the metal of the R6 frame was in this image. Metal is better for higher power electronics and achieving better cooling. The poly carbonate cases can very rugged and have better shock suppression than metal cases. Rugged cases must be good for comfortable grip feel, good shock suppression and cooling all at the same time. All of my Canon DSLRs have been very ruggedly packaged and I have had both metal and polycarbonate cased Canon camera bodies.
Yes I've never had problem with polycarbonate cameras. It just about the feeling. Metal feels better in the hand.

--
...
 
I have both the RP and the R6. Comparing them side by side, I can say that the build quality and the materials used are exactly the same except for some weather sealing. While the build quality was above my expectation for the RP it is the opposite in regard to R6 taking the price difference into consideration. However, R6 is a fantastic camera when it comes to AF and IBIS and the video specs so I am very happy with it.
 
I have both the RP and the R6. Comparing them side by side, I can say that the build quality and the materials used are exactly the same except for some weather sealing. While the build quality was above my expectation for the RP it is the opposite in regard to R6 taking the price difference into consideration. However, R6 is a fantastic camera when it comes to AF and IBIS and the video specs so I am very happy with it.
On my RP, I got these unremovable scratches while keeping the RP with a hand grip strap in my hand and riding my bike. I tried to ride the bike with one hand but still sometimes the RP was leaning against the soft rubber grip as I needed to steer the bike while keeping the camera at the same time. I noticed that the camera was pushing against the rubber grip but still was surprised to see these scratches.

As the R6 has about the same surface material like the RP, I will certainly be more careful with it.





b696112524aa4f9eb187f871105e8de5.jpg
 


The EOS R6 Magnesium Alloy Frame
The EOS R6 Magnesium Alloy Frame
that image is from the Canon R5, as it's only published under the R5's canon page. The R6 has magnesium parts but doesn't have a complete magnesium body frame like the R5.
Funny Valentine

Thank you for observing that error.
You kids might want to take that issue up with the folks at The Digital Picture who have posted this very image in their in-depth review of the R6 here: https://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EOS-R6.aspx
.



An extract from the article where the image is located. See link above
An extract from the article where the image is located. See link above

.

Canon themselves are no longer referring to the body materials on their spec sheets.
Canon themselves are no longer referring to the body materials on their spec sheets.

--
Regards,
Marco Nero.
 
The EOS R6 Magnesium Alloy Frame
The EOS R6 Magnesium Alloy Frame
that image is from the Canon R5, as it's only published under the R5's canon page. The R6 has magnesium parts but doesn't have a complete magnesium body frame like the R5.
Funny Valentine

Thank you for observing that error.
You kids might want to take that issue up with the folks at The Digital Picture who have posted this very image in their in-depth review of the R6 here: https://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EOS-R6.aspx
.

An extract from the article where the image is located. See link above
An extract from the article where the image is located. See link above

.

Canon themselves are no longer referring to the body materials on their spec sheets.
Canon themselves are no longer referring to the body materials on their spec sheets.
Dpreview is never very accurate with their spec pages and they never state the country of origin either.

Canon Europe official R6 spec page says for the materials of R6: " Magnesium Alloy chassis, outer panels are polycarbonate resin with glass fiber" https://www.canon-europe.com/cameras/eos-r6/specifications/

So I assume the R6 has a central magnesium part attached to the mount and the rest is polycarbonate.

and the magnesium frame picture is only on the R5's page at the bottom: https://www.canon-europe.com/cameras/eos-r5/professional-performance/

--
...
 
Last edited:
Just received the R6 but a little underwhelmed with the build quality compared to my 5D MKIV.

Not that its bad, its just feels a similar quality to the APS range.

For 2.5k it doesn't feel that substantial, but then again maybe it doesn't need to?

Interesting to hear owners views.

I assume the R5 has a more substantial feel?

Cheers

Jet Fuel
Indeed, the R5 is the direct successor to the 5D Mark IV. So there should be a more substantial feeling in the build there. As the R5 is heavier than the R6 as well. The R6 build quality is more comparable to the 6D Mark II.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top