Ai or Ai-S functionality on a D810

Both AI- and AI-S lenses will work fine on a D810. With the AI-S the lens aperture is calibrated so that it can be accurately set using the camera controls ( leaving the lens diaphragm ring set to the minimum f-stop - usually F22 or 32). The AI lenses will also work but the aperture may not be properly calibrated when the camera is used to select the aperture. In this case you may find it desirable to set the aperture using the ring on the lens. Frequently even AI lenses will work fine with the camera in auto exposure A mode where the camera sets the aperture - testing is your best option if you want to use the lens in this manner. I have seen little difference in my own experience.
^ Not true. Ai and Ai-s behave the same on modern cameras unless you have a custom chip installed.

- User of Ai and Ai-s lenses.
 
The Ai and Ai-s models of the 105mm /2.5 both render bokeh and sunstars very differently. If you are into portraits and smooth bokeh, get the Ai. If you like sunstars, get the Ai-s.

Neither lens handles flare well, I would recommend carrying a hoodnfor the Ai model unless you do not mind dealing with flare.
 
The Ai and Ai-s models of the 105mm /2.5 both render bokeh and sunstars very differently. If you are into portraits and smooth bokeh, get the Ai. If you like sunstars, get the Ai-s.
If you are referring to the number of aperture blades, that is true, but only if stopped down. Wide open, the blades are irrelevent.
 
The Ai and Ai-s models of the 105mm /2.5 both render bokeh and sunstars very differently. If you are into portraits and smooth bokeh, get the Ai. If you like sunstars, get the Ai-s.
If you are referring to the number of aperture blades, that is true, but only if stopped down. Wide open, the blades are irrelevent.
Both 105mm ai and ais have really nice bokeh, but stopped down it is for sure different. Some people here speculate that straight aperture blades on ais are sort of downgrade from ai, related to mechanical lever. I also speculate, but don't think nikon engineers considered it as downgrade. From todays point of view, sure, rounded blades are valued more than straight ones, but IMHO this is only matter of trend and sort of "fashion". I wouldn't be surprised that 30 years in future, people get fed up with rouded blade bokeh look and intentionaly opt for lens with straight blades.
 
The Ai and Ai-s models of the 105mm /2.5 both render bokeh and sunstars very differently. If you are into portraits and smooth bokeh, get the Ai. If you like sunstars, get the Ai-s.
If you are referring to the number of aperture blades, that is true, but only if stopped down. Wide open, the blades are irrelevent.
Captain Obvious had landed!
 
The Ai and Ai-s models of the 105mm /2.5 both render bokeh and sunstars very differently. If you are into portraits and smooth bokeh, get the Ai. If you like sunstars, get the Ai-s.
If you are referring to the number of aperture blades, that is true, but only if stopped down. Wide open, the blades are irrelevent.
Captain Obvious had landed!
Your original comment did not make it clear that the different bokeh rendering was only referring to stopped down usage. As these lenses are great at f2.5 it is not irrelevant to point out that wide open their bokeh is very similar. Indeed stopped down, the OOF highlights might be different shapes, but otherwise the bokeh may not be that different.
 
The Ai and Ai-s models of the 105mm /2.5 both render bokeh and sunstars very differently. If you are into portraits and smooth bokeh, get the Ai. If you like sunstars, get the Ai-s.
If you are referring to the number of aperture blades, that is true, but only if stopped down. Wide open, the blades are irrelevent.
Captain Obvious had landed!
Your original comment did not make it clear that the different bokeh rendering was only referring to stopped down usage. As these lenses are great at f2.5 it is not irrelevant to point out that wide open their bokeh is very similar. Indeed stopped down, the OOF highlights might be different shapes, but otherwise the bokeh may not be that different.
Saying that they render bokeh the same when wide open (meaning the blades are completely out of the way) is as useful as saying, "both lenses render the same when not mounted on the camera." Remove the differently shaped blades from the equation . . . and the differences go away. Amazing.

The bokeh between the two is markedly different. No "might be different" about it.

Btw, the biggest difference isn't due to the number of blades. It's that the Ai has rounded blades while the Ai-s has straight blades.
 
Last edited:
The Ai and Ai-s models of the 105mm /2.5 both render bokeh and sunstars very differently. If you are into portraits and smooth bokeh, get the Ai. If you like sunstars, get the Ai-s.
If you are referring to the number of aperture blades, that is true, but only if stopped down. Wide open, the blades are irrelevent.
Captain Obvious had landed!
Your original comment did not make it clear that the different bokeh rendering was only referring to stopped down usage. As these lenses are great at f2.5 it is not irrelevant to point out that wide open their bokeh is very similar. Indeed stopped down, the OOF highlights might be different shapes, but otherwise the bokeh may not be that different.
Saying that they render bokeh the same when wide open (meaning the blades are completely out of the way) is as useful as saying, "both lenses render the same when not mounted on the camera." Remove the differently shaped blades from the equation . . . and the differences go away. Amazing.

The bokeh between the two is markedly different. No "might be different" about it.

Btw, the biggest difference isn't due to the number of blades. It's that the Ai has rounded blades while the Ai-s has straight blades.
But the blades do still have an effect on bokeh even wide open at 2.5 correct?
 
The Ai and Ai-s models of the 105mm /2.5 both render bokeh and sunstars very differently. If you are into portraits and smooth bokeh, get the Ai. If you like sunstars, get the Ai-s.
If you are referring to the number of aperture blades, that is true, but only if stopped down. Wide open, the blades are irrelevent.
Captain Obvious had landed!
Your original comment did not make it clear that the different bokeh rendering was only referring to stopped down usage. As these lenses are great at f2.5 it is not irrelevant to point out that wide open their bokeh is very similar. Indeed stopped down, the OOF highlights might be different shapes, but otherwise the bokeh may not be that different.
Saying that they render bokeh the same when wide open (meaning the blades are completely out of the way) is as useful as saying, "both lenses render the same when not mounted on the camera." Remove the differently shaped blades from the equation . . . and the differences go away. Amazing.

The bokeh between the two is markedly different. No "might be different" about it.

Btw, the biggest difference isn't due to the number of blades. It's that the Ai has rounded blades while the Ai-s has straight blades.
But the blades do still have an effect on bokeh even wide open at 2.5 correct?
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top