Moving up to FX on a tight budget

I do a lot of shooting in dark places, as well as lots of "sketchy" places that I wouldn't really go without a friend, aside from the street photography and rooftopping that I do... but it seems that my friends' images turn out really nicely on the D750 and so I'm quite inclined to it. Gotta take it out on a test to see for myself though.
Isn't the D750 sensor pretty much the same than the D600?
 
Again, shooting raw, the pixels are the same pixels between the two cameras. As for lenses, only you know what you may be lacking from your uncle's collection.
Actually not really - but very close, I guess.

The sensor data are processed into RAW data by the ADC converter and the Expeed processor - and with them being somewhat different - so will the RAW datas. There's a reason for "updating" the Expeed - even Nikon does not document that reason.

I really doubt you will get two identical RAW-files of the "same shot" with the two cameras :-)

Not that I think, differences will matter in no way - which I doubt will be the case, if shooting jpg neither.
BirgerH.
 
I would get a second hand D610 (700-800 USD) a 50 1.8G a, a 85 f1.8G and maybe a Samyang 14 f2.8 or even better a 18-35. Regarding zooms, the 24-120 are quite cheap (half their price) now that they come as discounted kit. You can get a completely new lens for 500 USD (check Fred Miranda Buy and Sell and buy only from people with good feedback). In that place I have seen plenty 24-85G and 70-300VR going at 200 USD. I have also seen sigma 150 macro (non-VR) going for 400, this lens is fantastic.

I would strongly encourage you to get a good support system down the road.
I've been looking at a refurb D600 from Adorama... I know for sure I'm getting a 85 f/1.8 (AF, but not AF-D), 35 f/2 AF-D and a 180 f/2.8. I've been looking at the Rokinon 14.. but isn't Rokinon = Samyang?

N seems slightly out of my budget at this point... and I want to buy off ebay but the exchange rate is absolutely bad right now...

I currently have a Sigma 70-300 non-VR that I use on DX with crop, but I want to eventually get a 200-500 f/5.6E for FX venturing.

Thanks for your advice though!
I have a D600 (which is pretty much the same as the D610). If I had those lens listed, I'd get a D700. It's a better camera than the D600/D610 in almost everyday except the sensor. With those lens, you won't be doing the D600/D610 any justice, IMHO.
I must disagree. The 85 and 180 are fantastic in the d600.
you are welcome to disagree.

Here is what you can actually expect out of the 180 on the D600. Note the P-Mp

http://www.dxomark.com/Lenses/Nikon/Nikon-AF-Nikkor-180mm-F28D-IF-ED-mounted-on-Nikon-D600__834

You caught that the 85 which the OP has is from the early AF film era; Not the AF-D or the G. Right?

If I were the OP, it'd take a close look at all the lens P-MP result with different combinations of camera bodies for dxomark..if you can even find them tested.

Also watch this video to understand this better:

 
Last edited:
I would get a second hand D610 (700-800 USD) a 50 1.8G a, a 85 f1.8G and maybe a Samyang 14 f2.8 or even better a 18-35. Regarding zooms, the 24-120 are quite cheap (half their price) now that they come as discounted kit. You can get a completely new lens for 500 USD (check Fred Miranda Buy and Sell and buy only from people with good feedback). In that place I have seen plenty 24-85G and 70-300VR going at 200 USD. I have also seen sigma 150 macro (non-VR) going for 400, this lens is fantastic.

I would strongly encourage you to get a good support system down the road.
I've been looking at a refurb D600 from Adorama... I know for sure I'm getting a 85 f/1.8 (AF, but not AF-D), 35 f/2 AF-D and a 180 f/2.8. I've been looking at the Rokinon 14.. but isn't Rokinon = Samyang?

N seems slightly out of my budget at this point... and I want to buy off ebay but the exchange rate is absolutely bad right now...

I currently have a Sigma 70-300 non-VR that I use on DX with crop, but I want to eventually get a 200-500 f/5.6E for FX venturing.

Thanks for your advice though!
I have a D600 (which is pretty much the same as the D610). If I had those lens listed, I'd get a D700. It's a better camera than the D600/D610 in almost everyday except the sensor. With those lens, you won't be doing the D600/D610 any justice, IMHO.
I must disagree. The 85 and 180 are fantastic in the d600.
you are welcome to disagree.

Here is what you can actually expect out of the 180 on the D600. Note the P-Mp

http://www.dxomark.com/Lenses/Nikon/Nikon-AF-Nikkor-180mm-F28D-IF-ED-mounted-on-Nikon-D600__834
As I see it, it says 13 MP (out of 24) vs 8 (out of 12). I would say is significant.
You caught that the 85 which the OP has is from the early AF film era; Not the AF-D or the G. Right?
Didnt notice but it is my understanding that is not a bad lens. I have actually gone to the DXOmark site you mentioned and it says 17MP (D600) vs 10MP (D700). Not insignificant either.
If I were the OP, it'd take a close look at all the lens P-MP result with different combinations of camera bodies for dxomark..if you can even find them tested.
Agreed. But it entails a danger... you will see all those lenses that perform so well (and are so expensive) ....
Also watch this video to understand this better:

 
Last edited:
I would get a second hand D610 (700-800 USD) a 50 1.8G a, a 85 f1.8G and maybe a Samyang 14 f2.8 or even better a 18-35. Regarding zooms, the 24-120 are quite cheap (half their price) now that they come as discounted kit. You can get a completely new lens for 500 USD (check Fred Miranda Buy and Sell and buy only from people with good feedback). In that place I have seen plenty 24-85G and 70-300VR going at 200 USD. I have also seen sigma 150 macro (non-VR) going for 400, this lens is fantastic.

I would strongly encourage you to get a good support system down the road.
I've been looking at a refurb D600 from Adorama... I know for sure I'm getting a 85 f/1.8 (AF, but not AF-D), 35 f/2 AF-D and a 180 f/2.8. I've been looking at the Rokinon 14.. but isn't Rokinon = Samyang?

N seems slightly out of my budget at this point... and I want to buy off ebay but the exchange rate is absolutely bad right now...

I currently have a Sigma 70-300 non-VR that I use on DX with crop, but I want to eventually get a 200-500 f/5.6E for FX venturing.

Thanks for your advice though!
I have a D600 (which is pretty much the same as the D610). If I had those lens listed, I'd get a D700. It's a better camera than the D600/D610 in almost everyday except the sensor. With those lens, you won't be doing the D600/D610 any justice, IMHO.
I must disagree. The 85 and 180 are fantastic in the d600.
you are welcome to disagree.

Here is what you can actually expect out of the 180 on the D600. Note the P-Mp

http://www.dxomark.com/Lenses/Nikon/Nikon-AF-Nikkor-180mm-F28D-IF-ED-mounted-on-Nikon-D600__834
As I see it, it says 13 MP (out of 24) vs 8 (out of 12). I would say is significant.
If the OP feels happy buying a 24MP camera and only getting 13MP out of it that is really up to them. You have your opinion, I have mine. Which is fine. I'd rather get the better body with what he currently has. However, the OP should remember this point when they no doubt will go back to compare results between whatever camera and lens combination he ends up with and his friend's D750.

again, I need to disclose that I own a D600. What are you shooting?
 
Last edited:
I would get a second hand D610 (700-800 USD) a 50 1.8G a, a 85 f1.8G and maybe a Samyang 14 f2.8 or even better a 18-35. Regarding zooms, the 24-120 are quite cheap (half their price) now that they come as discounted kit. You can get a completely new lens for 500 USD (check Fred Miranda Buy and Sell and buy only from people with good feedback). In that place I have seen plenty 24-85G and 70-300VR going at 200 USD. I have also seen sigma 150 macro (non-VR) going for 400, this lens is fantastic.

I would strongly encourage you to get a good support system down the road.
I've been looking at a refurb D600 from Adorama... I know for sure I'm getting a 85 f/1.8 (AF, but not AF-D), 35 f/2 AF-D and a 180 f/2.8. I've been looking at the Rokinon 14.. but isn't Rokinon = Samyang?
It looks like a good selection to me, the 85 and 180 are great lenses, I have not used the 35 f2 but many people like it.

Yes Rokinon and Samyang and Bower and other names are the same lens. Before getting the rokinon/samyang consider that a filter system for that lens can be really expensive (as more expensive than the lens "expensive"). Sooner or later you are going to want to experiment with filters (ND, maybe infrared etc....it will be an expensive experimentation). A sensible option would be to wait until you save. In the meantime you can use the 35mm as an UWA by shooting and stitching, this way you will have hugenormous files that will give you billboard prints. Now if you are heavily into astrophotography, then take the Rokinon/Samyang, it is really good for that.
N seems slightly out of my budget at this point... and I want to buy off ebay but the exchange rate is absolutely bad right now...

I currently have a Sigma 70-300 non-VR that I use on DX with crop, but I want to eventually get a 200-500 f/5.6E for FX venturing.
Think twice before this and make sure you really like this kind of shooting. With that lens you will want a support system and a very sturdy one at that. Those things dont come cheap and are cumbersome to carry around. I would build the system from the bottom-up. First I would get a good tripod, then a good ballhead (if I am going to do studio/landscape) and only if I really really like wildlife-sports I would get a gimbal. I am telling you this from experience. I wanted to have everything covered and I got all that thinking I would like do that kind of photography. Since carrying all that equipment is cumbersome and I am kinda lazy (and dont have enough spare time), I think I must have used my system 5-6 times. Of course, your mileage might vary.
Thanks for your advice though!
You are very welcome
Forgot to also mention I do some aviation photography, which requires really long lenses, as I've found 300mm at DX crop not enough.. but I'm still on the fence between the various 150-600 and the 200-500.
 
I shoot RAW mostly, so I guess that wouldn't be too much of a difference I guess.

After going to a store and experimenting, I seem to like the D750 more than the D610 in terms of feel, layout and controls... but then the D750 is more expensive, naturally that happens haha.
There are a few SW features which are nice on the D750 and some focus improvements that are not on the D6x0.. but you lost me when you said differences in feel, layout and controls. What specific one's are you talking about?
Mainly ergonomics.

The tilting LCD, extra battery life, and I seem to like the placements of buttons on the D750 better.

I do like the Wi-Fi function as an extra.

However, I think I'll just get a D6x0 and a battery grip.. as I like battery grips and I'm inseparable from them...
 
Last edited:
I shoot RAW mostly, so I guess that wouldn't be too much of a difference I guess.

After going to a store and experimenting, I seem to like the D750 more than the D610 in terms of feel, layout and controls... but then the D750 is more expensive, naturally that happens haha.
There are a few SW features which are nice on the D750 and some focus improvements that are not on the D6x0.. but you lost me when you said differences in feel, layout and controls. What specific one's are you talking about?
Mainly ergonomics.

The tilting LCD, extra battery life, and I seem to like the placements of buttons on the D750 better.

I do like the Wi-Fi function as an extra.

However, I think I'll just get a D6x0 and a battery grip.. as I like battery grips and I'm inseparable from them...
here is my list of things I would have liked as an improvement on the D6x0 and other things that you listed that the D750 has.

You can do the same thing on the D600 using an add in wifi adapter. However, I have found the app and feature set of Nikon wifi across the board to be quite bad. Regardless of which model body. In short, it been a disappointed I don't use it. I hope this changes with their upcoming switch to Snapbridge. Have a look at the reviews of the wifi.. especially if you will be using an app on your smart phone. take a close look before you value this too much.

I was not aware of any significant difference in battery life.

Most people find that the D6x0 mis-focuses in artificial lighting. i.e. typical indoor photography. I can confirm that it does. However, it can be fixed. Recently Nikon did some kind of magic on mine and now I can get accurate focus with different kinds of light. However, it did cost me $155 for them to fix plus shipping the camera to them. So budget for that if you intend to shot it anything other than mid time daylight. Oh.. yeah.. golden hour throws it off too with the warm light.

If you wear glasses, you really should handle the camera in landscape orientation ahead of time and check that all of the corners are clear to you with your glasses on. Same goes for the D750. Put the camera up to white wall or sky and see if it feels comfortable to you and you can see all the corners at once without read adjusting your position. Also make sure its comfortable as the viewfinder is actually recessed into the body, tilting my head at an awkward angle more than pro bodies. The net result, are two darker corners and uncomfortable to use compared to the pro bodies. If you have a store near you, go compare between D6x0, D750 and a pro body like D8x0, D4s and if they have used D700.

It has no way to do quick one button 100% review of the focus area to check focus. On the higher end bodies you can simply hit the "OK" button in the middle of my multi-selector and get a 100% view of where you focused.

The flash x-sync is limited to 1/200. If you want to overpower daylight with your flash, every little bit more helps.

No way to lock the aperture dial and shutter dials. I often bump these and its kind of annoying to keep inspecting settings between shots to make sure they didn't move.

Tends to need cleaning of the sensor more than my other cameras. However, that said all camera need cleaning eventually. If you have a D600, the service is free for life but you need to pay for shipping to Nikon. Could be a pro or could be a con. Depends on your point of view.

Other than that its a great camera. Enjoy.
 
Last edited:
Hello everyone,

I am a high school student paying for everything out of my own pocket from my work in the summer/ after school, and basically I'm wanting to move to FX.
In high school? Save your money for college and use the camera you have. That's the best advice you'll get.
Several years ago, I started photography with a D5100 and kit lens, but my uncle is giving me his whole collection of lenses (there's about 10), all of which are FX lenses, some of which are only AF (sans D). (he used to shoot on the F4, but has since moved to Sony mirrorless)

I go shooting on a large variety of subjects, such as portraits, general events, landscape, astro and street photography.

I have friends that shoot with the D750 and D610, and I'm seemingly quite impressed with the dynamic range and ISO performance of the D750.

However, given my current budget of about $1800 CAD (stupid conversion rates getting really bad), should I get a D610 and some lenses or a D750?

I am slightly obsessed with my gear and also sometimes zoom in and inspect pixels.

Any advice would be great

Thanks,

h5ch
 
If I were to start from the beginning now.. I would look for a used D610 on Fred Miranda and get a Tamron 35mm F1.8 for $500, and Tokina 100mm Macro for $380. The Tokina would serve as a portrait and macro lense.. Buy it good once and you don't have to resell and buy something else later on..
 
here is my list of things I would have liked as an improvement on the D6x0 and other things that you listed that the D750 has.

You can do the same thing on the D600 using an add in wifi adapter. However, I have found the app and feature set of Nikon wifi across the board to be quite bad. Regardless of which model body. In short, it been a disappointed I don't use it. I hope this changes with their upcoming switch to Snapbridge. Have a look at the reviews of the wifi.. especially if you will be using an app on your smart phone. take a close look before you value this too much.

I was not aware of any significant difference in battery life.

Most people find that the D6x0 mis-focuses in artificial lighting.
I've been shooting with the D600 and D610 for 2 1/2 years and this has never been an issue for me. I've never heard anyone mentioning this as an issue, before. To suggest "most people" have experienced this problem is a gross exaggeration of reality.
If you wear glasses, you really should handle the camera in landscape orientation ahead of time and check that all of the corners are clear to you with your glasses on.
I wear glasses and this is a total non-issue for me. Prior to your post, I've never heard or read of a D600/D610 owner experiencing this.
It has no way to do quick one button 100% review of the focus area to check focus. On the higher end bodies you can simply hit the "OK" button in the middle of my multi-selector and get a 100% view of where you focused.

The flash x-sync is limited to 1/200. If you want to overpower daylight with your flash, every little bit more helps.

No way to lock the aperture dial and shutter dials. I often bump these and its kind of annoying to keep inspecting settings between shots to make sure they didn't move.
The D610 is an entry level, full frame body built around what is still one of the best sensors available on the market, today. A photographer can easily overcome minor issues like those you've identified. You can't use technique to overcome a lesser quality sensor. For the person who's clearly focused on sports and/or wildlife as their only interest(s) in photography, I could see the pro controls and build quality of the D700 being of interest. But for the generalist who's interested in a broad range of photography, The D610 is clearly the better choice.
 
I would get a second hand D610 (700-800 USD) a 50 1.8G a, a 85 f1.8G and maybe a Samyang 14 f2.8 or even better a 18-35. Regarding zooms, the 24-120 are quite cheap (half their price) now that they come as discounted kit. You can get a completely new lens for 500 USD (check Fred Miranda Buy and Sell and buy only from people with good feedback). In that place I have seen plenty 24-85G and 70-300VR going at 200 USD. I have also seen sigma 150 macro (non-VR) going for 400, this lens is fantastic.

I would strongly encourage you to get a good support system down the road.
I've been looking at a refurb D600 from Adorama...
Same exchange rate as on Ebay, eh. You can get a used D600 for $1000 to $1200 here in Toronto. Could you not do the same in Vancouver?
I know for sure I'm getting a 85 f/1.8 (AF, but not AF-D), 35 f/2 AF-D and a 180 f/2.8. I've been looking at the Rokinon 14.. but isn't Rokinon = Samyang?

N seems slightly out of my budget at this point... and I want to buy off ebay but the exchange rate is absolutely bad right now...

I currently have a Sigma 70-300 non-VR that I use on DX with crop, but I want to eventually get a 200-500 f/5.6E for FX venturing.

Thanks for your advice though!
 
here is my list of things I would have liked as an improvement on the D6x0 and other things that you listed that the D750 has.

You can do the same thing on the D600 using an add in wifi adapter. However, I have found the app and feature set of Nikon wifi across the board to be quite bad. Regardless of which model body. In short, it been a disappointed I don't use it. I hope this changes with their upcoming switch to Snapbridge. Have a look at the reviews of the wifi.. especially if you will be using an app on your smart phone. take a close look before you value this too much.

I was not aware of any significant difference in battery life.

Most people find that the D6x0 mis-focuses in artificial lighting.
I've been shooting with the D600 and D610 for 2 1/2 years and this has never been an issue for me. I've never heard anyone mentioning this as an issue, before. To suggest "most people" have experienced this problem is a gross exaggeration of reality.
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3380290

a quick poll that I did recently:

http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/57170825

and if want to hear it from the horse's mouth here is acknowledgement from Nikon they fixed it on later camera like the D810 (see Q31/A31).

http://nikonrumors.com/2016/01/08/n...ed-confidential-nikon-internal-document.aspx/
If you wear glasses, you really should handle the camera in landscape orientation ahead of time and check that all of the corners are clear to you with your glasses on.
I wear glasses and this is a total non-issue for me. Prior to your post, I've never heard or read of a D600/D610 owner experiencing this.
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/57310159
It has no way to do quick one button 100% review of the focus area to check focus. On the higher end bodies you can simply hit the "OK" button in the middle of my multi-selector and get a 100% view of where you focused.

The flash x-sync is limited to 1/200. If you want to overpower daylight with your flash, every little bit more helps.
http://strobist.blogspot.com/2012/09/nikon-d600-think-twice-before-you-jump.html#more
No way to lock the aperture dial and shutter dials. I often bump these and its kind of annoying to keep inspecting settings between shots to make sure they didn't move.
The D610 is an entry level, full frame body built around what is still one of the best sensors available on the market, today. A photographer can easily overcome minor issues like those you've identified. You can't use technique to overcome a lesser quality sensor. For the person who's clearly focused on sports and/or wildlife as their only interest(s) in photography, I could see the pro controls and build quality of the D700 being of interest. But for the generalist who's interested in a broad range of photography, The D610 is clearly the better choice.

--
Bill Ferris Photography
Flagstaff, AZ
http://www.billferris.photoshelter.com
--
reminder to self.
#1 "never explain never complain." -toomanycannons.
#2. keep posts limited to questions only and post of photos for C&C.
 
Last edited:
I would get a second hand D610 (700-800 USD) a 50 1.8G a, a 85 f1.8G and maybe a Samyang 14 f2.8 or even better a 18-35. Regarding zooms, the 24-120 are quite cheap (half their price) now that they come as discounted kit. You can get a completely new lens for 500 USD (check Fred Miranda Buy and Sell and buy only from people with good feedback). In that place I have seen plenty 24-85G and 70-300VR going at 200 USD. I have also seen sigma 150 macro (non-VR) going for 400, this lens is fantastic.

I would strongly encourage you to get a good support system down the road.
I've been looking at a refurb D600 from Adorama... I know for sure I'm getting a 85 f/1.8 (AF, but not AF-D), 35 f/2 AF-D and a 180 f/2.8. I've been looking at the Rokinon 14.. but isn't Rokinon = Samyang?

N seems slightly out of my budget at this point... and I want to buy off ebay but the exchange rate is absolutely bad right now...

I currently have a Sigma 70-300 non-VR that I use on DX with crop, but I want to eventually get a 200-500 f/5.6E for FX venturing.

Thanks for your advice though!
I have a D600 (which is pretty much the same as the D610). If I had those lens listed, I'd get a D700. It's a better camera than the D600/D610 in almost everyday except the sensor. With those lens, you won't be doing the D600/D610 any justice, IMHO.
I must disagree. The 85 and 180 are fantastic in the d600.
you are welcome to disagree.

Here is what you can actually expect out of the 180 on the D600. Note the P-Mp

http://www.dxomark.com/Lenses/Nikon/Nikon-AF-Nikkor-180mm-F28D-IF-ED-mounted-on-Nikon-D600__834
As I see it, it says 13 MP (out of 24) vs 8 (out of 12). I would say is significant.
If the OP feels happy buying a 24MP camera and only getting 13MP out of it that is really up to them. You have your opinion, I have mine. Which is fine. I'd rather get the better body with what he currently has. However, the OP should remember this point when they no doubt will go back to compare results between whatever camera and lens combination he ends up with and his friend's D750.

again, I need to disclose that I own a D600. What are you shooting?
I also use mainly a D600 and with some careful processing you get more than those 13-17MP out of those lenses. Still, I get your point of the diminishing returns with lenses that not take the best out of sensors. It is just that considering the 100-200 USD different in price I think the D600 is a better deal (again this is totally subjective).

BTW, the D600 is not my only camera but it is my workhorse and it suits my shooting.
 
here is my list of things I would have liked as an improvement on the D6x0 and other things that you listed that the D750 has.

You can do the same thing on the D600 using an add in wifi adapter. However, I have found the app and feature set of Nikon wifi across the board to be quite bad. Regardless of which model body. In short, it been a disappointed I don't use it. I hope this changes with their upcoming switch to Snapbridge. Have a look at the reviews of the wifi.. especially if you will be using an app on your smart phone. take a close look before you value this too much.

I was not aware of any significant difference in battery life.

Most people find that the D6x0 mis-focuses in artificial lighting.
I've been shooting with the D600 and D610 for 2 1/2 years and this has never been an issue for me. I've never heard anyone mentioning this as an issue, before. To suggest "most people" have experienced this problem is a gross exaggeration of reality.
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3380290

a quick poll that I did recently:

http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/57170825

and if want to hear it from the horse's mouth here is acknowledgement from Nikon they fixed it on later camera like the D810 (see Q31/A31).

http://nikonrumors.com/2016/01/08/n...ed-confidential-nikon-internal-document.aspx/
With respect, neither the thread, nor poll nor Nikon "internal" memo offer any foundation for the blanket statement that the D600/D610 regularly misses focus in artificial lighting. The memo acknowledges the D5's AF algorithm is improved in comparison to the D4 and D810. One would hope a newly released flagship camera will deliver improved performance over its predecessors. The poll results are for a statistically insignificant 11 responses. No conclusions about D600/D610 performance can be drawn from it. The thread is inconclusive, at best, about the cause of the focusing issues the OP was experiencing.

On a personal note, other than hoping the OP of this thread is getting input that will aid in making a choice of equipment that will meet his interests and budget, I don't care which product he chooses. However, it would be a disservice to allow a person to be steered away from a viable option based on unsupported claims about performance. The IQ of the D610 sensor makes that camera a great value at its price. The features, controls and other specs make it an entry level body...which is to be expected, based on its price.

I wish the OP success on his decision.
 
I shoot RAW mostly, so I guess that wouldn't be too much of a difference I guess.

After going to a store and experimenting, I seem to like the D750 more than the D610 in terms of feel, layout and controls... but then the D750 is more expensive, naturally that happens haha.
There are a few SW features which are nice on the D750 and some focus improvements that are not on the D6x0.. but you lost me when you said differences in feel, layout and controls. What specific one's are you talking about?
Mainly ergonomics.

The tilting LCD, extra battery life, and I seem to like the placements of buttons on the D750 better.

I do like the Wi-Fi function as an extra.

However, I think I'll just get a D6x0 and a battery grip.. as I like battery grips and I'm inseparable from them...
The D600 body is around $800 on eBay, the D610 about $1200 and D750 about $1600. They're all incredibly similar in size, button layout and IQ. The D750 is a bit faster AF in low light. If I was on a tight budget I wouldn't hesitate going for the 600. Even if you have oil and dirt issues, Nikon will still replace the shutter or upgrade the camera for free.
 
Since your funds are limited, I think the choice is easy. All three models, D600, 610, and 750, are close in IQ. Spending less on the body and more on lenses will get you the best images. Also, good glass generally outlasts a good body.

Spending more on good lenses will give you better results now and in the future.
 
Short answer - D600 and spend rest on glass...
 
I would think that the D750, D610 and D600 could give a similar experience and it would depend upon what good used models are available.
 
Yes. If the choice is between a body and some lenses or just a body, it's pretty important to know if the OP has some good lenses to start off with. In which case I'd suggest the D750 if there are no major lens issues. Though I kind of like the idea of a D700 too.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top