Canon EOS 1D X Mark II specs

I am shocked-SHOCKED that all the nikon trolls are so disappointed with this camera.

61 AF points at f8-fantastic.

16 frames per second with dual-pixel AF-fantastic.

Canon long primes-fantastic.

Canon continues to own 2/3rds of the pro market-same-old, same-old.
All points active @ f/8 seems (to me) to be a huge achievement. That alone is a leaps and bounds upgrade past anything else on the market as far as AF goes.
 
I am shocked-SHOCKED that all the nikon trolls are so disappointed with this camera.

61 AF points at f8-fantastic.

16 frames per second with dual-pixel AF-fantastic.

Canon long primes-fantastic.

Canon continues to own 2/3rds of the pro market-same-old, same-old.
4k at 60fps is pretty special too. no one's doing that.

now with DPAF and what they are calling "AI AF accuracy and motion tracking was improved Servo AF III" I wonder if that's that hybrid patent that uses both PDAF sensors and DPAF senors.

more specs are coming out:

20.2MP CMOS Sensor

Dynamic range improvement

Dual pixel CMOS AF

Dual DIGIC6 + processor

ISO100-51200 (extended with 409600)

Continuous shooting 14 frames / sec.

Live View mode at 16 frames / sec – high-speed continuous shooting new mirror drive system to allow the (at 16 frames / sec.)

Continuous shooting possible number is 170 frames in RAW -. In JPEG Unlimited

61-point AF system, which range is expanded. 41-point cross-type

AF is -3EV correspondence

With lighting AF point red (I hope this means solid red AF point in servo)

AI AF accuracy and motion tracking was improved Servo AF III + – 360000 dot metering sensor.

EOS iSA. EOS itr

Viewfinder magnification 0.76 times. 100% field of view

Videos 4K 60fps.

Full HD120fps.

4K video can be recorded with the internal CFast2.0 Media

Movie Servo AF – LCD monitor 3.2 inches, 1.62 million dot. Touch panel.

Camera digital lens Optimizer (DLO).

Lens aberration correction.

Diffraction correction

CFast2.0 and compact flash of dual card slot

GPS built-in – 2-axis electronic level

USB3.0 terminal, HDMI terminal

W-FI option (WFT-E8A)

Size of 158mm x 167.6mm x 82.6 mm

DLO in camera?? :o

that would be freaking incredible - all your lens corrections done before you even write out the RAW file? hmm.
 
Last edited:
Would you want the same fps and viewfinder lag as the a7r2 as well?

Just for the hell of it and to see everyone's jaw drop I would love it if that bulge, which sadly interrupts the lovely flowing curvature of the 1d bodies, turned out to be a pop up flash. Won't happen obviously. :-D

On a more serious note: It's all in the video spec. If it isn't as stymied as in the Nikon there would be a lot of very happy pros who want to use it for the odd clip. At least Canon's 1Dc never had any overheating problems... . :-)

  1. Mirror less hence huge weight reduction
  2. Great EVF just as in Sony a7
  3. Same focusing speed with wide coverage.
  4. EF mount.
  5. Same battery life by incorporating larger battery or reduced power consumption.
 
Fantastic!!! :-)
 
I really think it would be best to hear from Canon directly before getting hot and bothered.
+1

I also read somewhere that there was new sensor technology with 15 stops of DR...

All rumors to this point, we'll just have to wait and see.
 
Surely they are just using the 6d sensor? That so happens to be 20.2 mpx doesn't it?
 
for those that use extenders..

all points AF at F/8 *AND* DLO to help mitigate all optical flaws in camera? sounds pretty nice to me

considering that DLO corrects for the combination of characteristics of extender + lens.

If that is switchable and does it in raw before you write it out, that could be very impressive.
 
The earlier specs on Canon Rumors were not exactly exciting, but this goes from bad to worse. I skipped the 1DX and have waited 8.5 years since getting my 1DsMK3, and now I feel cheated. OK, I have my name on the list for a 1DX2 at Photo & Video in Christchurch, but now I don't know I want one.

Very disappointing news. CR makes the point that leaks have been particularly hard to come by for this camera. With such a weak showing, I am not surprised Canon have held tight to their shameful secret!
 
The earlier specs on Canon Rumors were not exactly exciting, but this goes from bad to worse. I skipped the 1DX and have waited 8.5 years since getting my 1DsMK3, and now I feel cheated. OK, I have my name on the list for a 1DX2 at Photo & Video in Christchurch, but now I don't know I want one.

Very disappointing news. CR makes the point that leaks have been particularly hard to come by for this camera. With such a weak showing, I am not surprised Canon have held tight to their shameful secret!

--
Trevor
www.flickr.com/photos/trevor-dennis/
weird.. what exactly was earth shattering that you expected?
Indeed - I too skipped the 1DX and kept my 1Ds3.

The 5Ds however addressed many of the reasons I kept the 1Ds3, so I got one.
for your stuff I could certainly see where a 5Ds suits you at least resolution wise. how are you liking the 5Ds.. haven't seen you say much lately.
I still miss some of the 1 series 'feel' but I have difficulty in seeing why if the 1D X was skipped for keeping a 1Ds3, just what it was that was expected?
the only differences in the "core specs" were the AF having "only" 61 points and 22 versus 20mp.
They were never going to make it any more than the next in the 1D series.

Shove an 80+MP sensor into an 's' version and I might be tempted
maybe that's the 250MP next year ;)
 
Last edited:
for your stuff I could certainly see where a 5Ds suits you at least resolution wise. how are you liking the 5Ds.. haven't seen you say much lately.
It's excellent - I'm finding it helps having all those extra pixels, even for most of my commercial work which might only be supplied at 3k px wide.

For the last few months I've been re-writing the entire Northlight site from scratch, which is taking a long while and I've only really been adding new reviews and a few articles.

A longer 'so, was 50MP really that much better' article is on my to-do list for the next month or two. I'm hoping for Canon to get their act together and sort a PRO-1000 for a review before long, and that gives me the chance to print a lot of larger 5Ds images and do some more experimentation.
 
Source in Japanese and the text is the output of Google translator.

The specs are not impressive comparing to Nikon D5 :-|

From the direction of the reader, we have to provide information about the sharp images and specs of the Canon EOS-1D X Mark II.
  • Canon announce soon EOS-1D X Mark II. As of specs of next EOS-1D X Mark II that is currently known.
    - 20.2MP CMOS sensor. Dynamic range improvement
    - Dual pixel CMOS AF
    - 61-point AF system, which range is expanded. 41-point cross-type. All of the distance measuring point can be selected
    - With lighting AF point red
    - F8 even 61 points all of the distance measuring point can be selected
    - AI AF accuracy and motion tracking has improved Servo AF III +
    - Dual DIGIC6 + processor
    - New mirror drive system that enables high-speed continuous shooting
    - Video 4K 60fps. Possible internal recording at CFast2.0T media
    - Continuous shooting up to 16 frames / sec (live view mode)
    - Dual pixel CMOS AF, enables smooth AF with 4K video
    - GPS built-in
    - USB3.0 terminal, HDMI terminal
    - Dust and water specification
    - Wi-Fi option (WFT-E8)
    - The size of 158mm x 167.6mm x 82.6mm
    - Weight 1340g
EOS-1D X Mark II is, I seem to be equipped with a 4K video of rumor as 60fps. AF is, does not change what the distance measurement points, the range is expanded, It is quite fascinating to all of the distance measuring point is enabled in the F8.

In appearance stand out climax of penta upper portion, but whether this would be GPS. After that, it is where the frame speed and ISO range of continuous shooting in the normal mode is a concern.

Source: _https://translate.google.com/transl...-8&u=http://www.digicame-info.com/&edit-text=

canon_eos1dx_markii_f001.jpg
If these specs are real... Canon really is disappointing me. I expected more... much more.

--
Feel Always Humble - "FAH" - You'll Learn More
http://www.kissmykite.com
What did you expect ?

- more Mpixels ?

- more AF module (all of this are F8 now, compared to the center only with the 1dx)

- more than 16 fps ? (probabily 12 or 14 with the mirror)

- more DR ? (there is indeed more DR, but we should wait to know how much, and at what ISO setting)

- faster than 4 K 60 fps ?

--
It's all about photography
I don't think it's about "photography". And I very much don't think it's about "sports". I can't say anything now with complete candor because no one knows what the real specs are. But there is nothing in THIS piece that makes me want tot get one. As a sports shooter, Canon left me out in the cold if this is what they are planning on trying and sell to me. If this IS the case Nikon won this round! And I never thought I would say that.

--
Feel Always Humble - "FAH" - You'll Learn More
 
Wow, that is a weak showing so far. The only thing we had rumored before was a barely detectable resolution increase, and now not even that. I'm surprised they'd even create a Mark II that's so little improved over the excellent 1Dx. Maybe they'll deliver on a serious improvement to the 11.8 stops of DR.
Agree. I still don't understand why Canon is not using 7D Mark II AF system on 1D X Mark II. Is it supposed to be better?
Your kidding right.

--
Don Lacy
https://500px.com/lacy
http://www.witnessnature.net/
The 7DII AF is better in at least three respects: there are 65 points, which is a minor improvement; all 65 are cross-type, which is a not so minor improvement; and the spread of AF points covers a larger portion of the frame. The 1DX AF is also better than the 7DII in at least one respect: there are five high-precision F2.8 points in the middle, compared with one for the 7DII. I would have thought that, whatever else Canon did with the 1DX AF, they would make all the points cross-type. For all the hype about the Nikon D500 AF, the fact that it only has 35 selectable cross-type points, and 55 selectable points altogether, suggests to me that it may not perform any better than the 7DII, at least for most purposes (maybe the non-selectable AF points will help with certain kinds of tracking).

--
As the length of a thread approaches 150, the probability that someone will make the obvious "it's not the camera, it's the photographer" remark approaches 1.
Alastair
http://anorcross.smugmug.com
Equipment in profile
 
Last edited:
I am shocked-SHOCKED that all the nikon trolls are so disappointed with this camera.

61 AF points at f8-fantastic.

16 frames per second with dual-pixel AF-fantastic.

Canon long primes-fantastic.

Canon continues to own 2/3rds of the pro market-same-old, same-old.
All points active @ f/8 seems (to me) to be a huge achievement. That alone is a leaps and bounds upgrade past anything else on the market as far as AF goes.
As a sports shooter, I'm not shooting at f8 much nor do I need a video camera.

What I needed was more DR to pull shadows from athletes in difficult lighting and the opportunity to have better cropping options because of 24 pix vs 20.

I also wanted better AWB, refinement of the 6 AF cases, ability to bracket from EVAL,Point, to Center. Better MA or AUTO MA for Canon A lenses. Two different cards is a pain in the BUTT.

WHAT IS CANON THINKING???

I'm being selfish thinking that the camera would be devoted to sports. But it seems as if we were thrown UNDER the bus.
 
I am shocked-SHOCKED that all the nikon trolls are so disappointed with this camera.

61 AF points at f8-fantastic.

16 frames per second with dual-pixel AF-fantastic.

Canon long primes-fantastic.

Canon continues to own 2/3rds of the pro market-same-old, same-old.
All points active @ f/8 seems (to me) to be a huge achievement. That alone is a leaps and bounds upgrade past anything else on the market as far as AF goes.
As a sports shooter, I'm not shooting at f8 much nor do I need a video camera.

What I needed was more DR to pull shadows from athletes in difficult lighting and the opportunity to have better cropping options because of 24 pix vs 20.

I also wanted better AWB, refinement of the 6 AF cases, ability to bracket from EVAL,Point, to Center. Better MA or AUTO MA for Canon A lenses. Two different cards is a pain in the BUTT.

WHAT IS CANON THINKING???

I'm being selfish thinking that the camera would be devoted to sports. But it seems as if we were thrown UNDER the bus.
 
I am shocked-SHOCKED that all the nikon trolls are so disappointed with this camera.

61 AF points at f8-fantastic.

16 frames per second with dual-pixel AF-fantastic.

Canon long primes-fantastic.

Canon continues to own 2/3rds of the pro market-same-old, same-old.
All points active @ f/8 seems (to me) to be a huge achievement. That alone is a leaps and bounds upgrade past anything else on the market as far as AF goes.
As a sports shooter, I'm not shooting at f8 much nor do I need a video camera.

What I needed was more DR to pull shadows from athletes in difficult lighting and the opportunity to have better cropping options because of 24 pix vs 20.

I also wanted better AWB, refinement of the 6 AF cases, ability to bracket from EVAL,Point, to Center. Better MA or AUTO MA for Canon A lenses. Two different cards is a pain in the BUTT.

WHAT IS CANON THINKING???
well, they do have a new 300,000 pixel iTR metering sensor.

it also includes alot more functions for optical correction in camera.

we don't know about DR.. so it's probably a little early to complain.. not even the D3/4 cameras are "high DR" cameras.

with DPAF and PDAF combined .. there maybe automatic AF tuning. hard to say. there was some patents specificaly around AI servo using both PDAF and DPAF.

so it's probably a little early to start shouting. monday or tuesday - shout away ;)
 
Wow, that is a weak showing so far. The only thing we had rumored before was a barely detectable resolution increase, and now not even that. I'm surprised they'd even create a Mark II that's so little improved over the excellent 1Dx. Maybe they'll deliver on a serious improvement to the 11.8 stops of DR.
Agree. I still don't understand why Canon is not using 7D Mark II AF system on 1D X Mark II. Is it supposed to be better?
Your kidding right.

--
Don Lacy
https://500px.com/lacy
http://www.witnessnature.net/
The 7DII AF is better in at least three respects: there are 65 points, which is a minor improvement; all 65 are cross-type, which is a not so minor improvement; and the spread of AF points covers a larger portion of the frame
that's only because it's APS-C all the 7DII AF points are f5.6, except one center cross. that's huge for accurate wide open super tele's.
 
Last edited:
  • 20.2MP CMOS sensor with dynamic range improvement
  • Dual pixel CMOS AF
  • ISO: 100-51200 (expanded in 409600)
  • 61-point AF system, expanded range, 41-point cross-type, all of the distance measuring points can be selected
  • At f/8, 61 points can be selected
  • AF is -3EV
  • 360000 dot photometric sensor. EOS iSA. EOS iTR
  • 0.76 times the viewfinder magnification. 100% field of view
  • Improved AI AF accuracy and motion tracking Servo AF III +
  • Dual DIGIC6 + processor
  • New mirror drive system that enables high-speed continuous shooting
  • Video 4K 60fps. Full HD120fps, 4K video can be recorded in internal CFast2.0 media
  • Movie servo AF
  • Continuous shooting up to14 fps, 16 fps in live view mode
  • Continuous shooting in RAW: 170 frames (at 16 frames / sec.), unlimited in JPEG
  • Dual pixel CMOS AF, enables smooth AF with 4K video
  • LCD monitor 3.2 inches, 1.62 million dots. Touch panel.
  • Camera digital lens Optimizer (DLO), lens aberration correction, diffraction correction
  • CFast2.0 and compact flash slots
  • GPS built-in
  • USB3.0 terminal, HDMI terminal
  • Dust and water resistant
  • Wi-Fi option (WFT-E8)
  • Dimensions: 158mm x 167.6mm x 82.6mm
  • Weight: 1340g
 
Wow, that is a weak showing so far. The only thing we had rumored before was a barely detectable resolution increase, and now not even that. I'm surprised they'd even create a Mark II that's so little improved over the excellent 1Dx. Maybe they'll deliver on a serious improvement to the 11.8 stops of DR.
Agree. I still don't understand why Canon is not using 7D Mark II AF system on 1D X Mark II. Is it supposed to be better?
I sure hope they don't use the 7D2 AF system on a flagship camera. Google "Canon 7D2 AF issues" and you can read for as long as you're willing. The fact Canon hasn't so much as acknowledged is the issues so many people are having yet is no different than the Nikon D600 oil debacle.

The 1DX has better AF than the 7D2. The 1DX also has a separate, dedicated processor for AF while the 7D2 does not.

More on point though, those are some pretty weak specs in light of the D5 - I hope there are some surprises in store.
 
Last edited:

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top