R_U_Q_R_U
Senior Member
Not get too off-topic, here is an article by NY TIMES writer NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF:Are you saying you do not own any products that come from China? Not your clothing, housewares, toys, etc? I have a hard time believing that.This is why I avoid China/Malaysia products too. Atrocious human rights violations and terrible working conditions. Yet most Americans don't care and just want cheap cheap cheap. Sorry, but a lens made very fast on an assembly line in China, is not the same as made in Japan from someone with a close eye in quality.
Most likely, you, like the rest of us, consumes plenty of products that come from China. See, here in the U.S. we like to have it both ways...we condemn sweat shops, while at the same time, love the cheap junk that comes out of them.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/06/opinion/06kristof.htmlWell-meaning American university students regularly campaign against sweatshops. But instead, anyone who cares about fighting poverty should campaign in favor of sweatshops, demanding that companies set up factories in Africa. If Africa could establish a clothing export industry, that would fight poverty far more effectively than any foreign aid program.
http://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2008/Powellsweatshops.htmlIn one famous 1993 case U.S. senator Tom Harkin proposed banning imports from countries that employed children in sweatshops. In response a factory in Bangladesh laid off 50,000 children. What was their next best alternative? According to the British charity Oxfam a large number of them became prostitutes.
The point is that buying goods from China is not a simple moral choice as some want to make it.
The quality of the goods should be the deciding factor -- the world economy is so tightly integrated you can no longer by any mass produced product that does not have some "issue" attached to it.
As Paul Krugman put it:
http://www.slate.com/articles/business/the_dismal_science/1997/03/in_praise_of_cheap_labor.htmlBut matters are not that simple, and the moral lines are not that clear. In fact, let me make a counter-accusation: The lofty moral tone of the opponents of globalization is possible only because they have chosen not to think their position through. While fat-cat capitalists might benefit from globalization, the biggest beneficiaries are, yes, Third World workers.
Last edited: