Language....?????

  • Thread starter Thread starter John Burns
  • Start date Start date
Whether or not we accept the plural usage concept, I did notice an
inconsistency in Phils news headlines.
"Samsung breaks ..." singular
"Samsung have introduced ... " plural
and
"Agfa cuts price ..." singular
"Agfa have decided ..." plural
I suppose some argument could be made for different context, but being a
mathematician by training, I highly value consistency.
I'm just sitting here and enjoying been trashed by everyone.

Cheers guys.
 
I'm not an English major either but you and I are in agreement on this.

I see this at work too. People who have college degrees who make statements like "already have a digital camera". it's sad.

what did they learn in college? the language? which language?

who knows?

typo's are one thing. this counterfeit communication perpatrated by today's media, "gansta rap" or whatever has got to go. there has to be one place left in the world where the language matters.
Amen to your frustration.
 
I'm just reporting what i see and hear on TV and the net.
John
Having been a writer all of my 40-year working life, mostly in the
newspaper trade, I can only add that I would have been dismissed in the
very first week of my career had I insisted on writing such sentences as
"Nikon have announced..."
And later, as an editor, I would have afforded any reporters using this
verb linkage the same treatment. I guess a web site owner use whatever
verbs he or she desires. We don't HAVE to read the material and we're
not paying anything exta to log onto it. But like a lot of the lousy
usage of the English language today, it sure makes me cringe.
 
John -

A few hundred years ago in England, there were probably fewer rules to go on when it came to grammar. Examining some of the literature of the period reveals a lot of variation between different locales and stations in life.

I'm surprised that you aren't even more bothered by the mistakes in spelling, which tend to be far more glaring from post to post (surprisingly, in this entire thread as well) than any problems with verb tenses where even the "rules" allow for more leniency. :)
I will take your work for it, however when you have to cite sports
announcers as an authority on language usage you are on shaky ground. ;)
 
Don't take offense Phil. This thread is just a nice relief from the "blues". Basically I like the plural usage (as you may have noted from my posts). I've always hated the inconsistencies of the English language rules and admired the much higher level of consistency in purer languages such as the romance languages.

But I'd like to hear (from you or someone else) if the plural usage is typical in England, or British heritage countries, like someone else suggested.

Keep up the good work :)

Don
I'm just sitting here and enjoying been trashed by everyone.

Cheers guys.
 
I'm surprised that you aren't even more bothered by the mistakes in
spelling, which tend to be far more glaring from post to post
Wot! I'm a purfect speler, bot sumtims my brane dosn't cumonicate wit my figers veri wel.

Don
 
Oh God!
I love you guys more than my husband!

I love you Phil, giving us a place to go wild other than our interest of digital photogragphy.
Hey, pardon me if I made grammatical mistakes!!!!!!
Amy
But I'd like to hear (from you or someone else) if the plural usage is
typical in England, or British heritage countries, like someone else
suggested.

Keep up the good work :)

Don
I'm just sitting here and enjoying been trashed by everyone.

Cheers guys.
 
If the forums program had the capabilities of a word processor, many of the errors would cease to apperar. However, those capabilities are not available to forum users. I'm certain word processing capabilities could be incorporated into the forum pages. The result would be extended screen loading times. Most individuals seeking to discuss issues that forums provide would quickly go elsewhere if loading times increased.

Publishing firms have editing departments whose task is to catch gramatical inacuracies and mispelling. Is that how you spell gramatical? I will not get my hard copy dictionary. I believe the phonetic version is sufficient to convey my point. Professional organizations need to edit their published work. If they do not, business will suffer.

The English language is complicated. This language is spoken in every country of the world. Many countries consider "English" as their native language. Many of the countries that consider this language as their native tongue speak a form of "English" very different from formal United Kindom English. English is spoken in different colloquial forms throughout the world. I for example, am a descendent of Canadians of the Manitoba Province. While growing up I learned to greet others by saying "Yeah". I never felt comfortable with the proper and more universeally acceptable word "hello". I learned after many years, the reason behind my unorthodox greeting. I came to learn, that the workers from who I am descended worked on the docks at the Great Lakes Canals. Screaming the word "Yeah" carried further then "hello". As time went by, the word "Yeah" became the standard form of greeting for Canadians living in the Red River Valley area of Manitoba. Many times, I need to explain my greeting to people who find it offensive. It's part of my heritage. It is not formal English. I will, use the word hello (with some discomfort) in situations that demand formal English.

In addition, many of the words contained in the English language have their origins in the French, German, Italian, Spanish, Hebrew etc., etc. languages. Proper sentence structure also has been modified from the rules taught to those who have studied formal English.

Entire communities within the San Francisco Bay Area where I reside, have modified versions of the English language. I would almost certainly need a translator if I traveled into East Oakland. My form of English is, for the majority of East Oakland residents, unacceptable. It would mark me as an outsider. I would be viewed with suspicion!

The preceeding paragraphs contain errors. Spelling, sentence structure, punctuation errors are present in those paragraphs. The situation does not call for formal spelling and sentence structure. It is a forum.
I'm not an English major but something is bothering me about the use of
linking verbs on this AND OTHER sites. When referring to a company the
plural is often used (ex. Sony are releasing....Nikon have released).
Also in the news section today a mention of the PC Watch site uses the
plural linking verb "have" to refer to the site. I am not trying to
start any kind of a flame war and this should in no way be considered a
criticism of Phil but this brings up some troubling thoughts.

1. I have been writing and speaking incorrectly for 52 years. (possible,
I've been doing other things wrong nearly that long)

2. Incorrect grammer is spreading over the net since this is becoming
more common. (which leads me to believe I may have missed something)

3. Someone changed the rules while I was taking a nap.

If anyone of you linguists could spread some light on this I would
appreciate it. I am LD in spelling but thought I at least had an
understanding of the basic grammer rules.

John
 
All very interesting but what does it have to do with mixing up singular and plural? I doubt proper usage would increase loading time. I don't want to get into a long debate on this. Phonetic spelling does get the point across, improper grammar often does not. It has nothing to do with the capabilities of the word processor but with the capability of the writer.

John
Publishing firms have editing departments whose task is to catch
gramatical inacuracies and mispelling. Is that how you spell gramatical?
I will not get my hard copy dictionary. I believe the phonetic version is
sufficient to convey my point. Professional organizations need to edit
their published work. If they do not, business will suffer.

The English language is complicated. This language is spoken in every
country of the world. Many countries consider "English" as their native
language. Many of the countries that consider this language as their
native tongue speak a form of "English" very different from formal United
Kindom English. English is spoken in different colloquial forms
throughout the world. I for example, am a descendent of Canadians of the
Manitoba Province. While growing up I learned to greet others by saying
"Yeah". I never felt comfortable with the proper and more universeally
acceptable word "hello". I learned after many years, the reason behind my
unorthodox greeting. I came to learn, that the workers from who I am
descended worked on the docks at the Great Lakes Canals. Screaming the
word "Yeah" carried further then "hello". As time went by, the word
"Yeah" became the standard form of greeting for Canadians living in the
Red River Valley area of Manitoba. Many times, I need to explain my
greeting to people who find it offensive. It's part of my heritage. It is
not formal English. I will, use the word hello (with some discomfort) in
situations that demand formal English.

In addition, many of the words contained in the English language have
their origins in the French, German, Italian, Spanish, Hebrew etc., etc.
languages. Proper sentence structure also has been modified from the
rules taught to those who have studied formal English.

Entire communities within the San Francisco Bay Area where I reside, have
modified versions of the English language. I would almost certainly need
a translator if I traveled into East Oakland. My form of English is, for
the majority of East Oakland residents, unacceptable. It would mark me as
an outsider. I would be viewed with suspicion!

The preceeding paragraphs contain errors. Spelling, sentence structure,
punctuation errors are present in those paragraphs. The situation does
not call for formal spelling and sentence structure. It is a forum.
I'm not an English major but something is bothering me about the use of
linking verbs on this AND OTHER sites. When referring to a company the
plural is often used (ex. Sony are releasing....Nikon have released).
Also in the news section today a mention of the PC Watch site uses the
plural linking verb "have" to refer to the site. I am not trying to
start any kind of a flame war and this should in no way be considered a
criticism of Phil but this brings up some troubling thoughts.

1. I have been writing and speaking incorrectly for 52 years. (possible,
I've been doing other things wrong nearly that long)

2. Incorrect grammer is spreading over the net since this is becoming
more common. (which leads me to believe I may have missed something)

3. Someone changed the rules while I was taking a nap.

If anyone of you linguists could spread some light on this I would
appreciate it. I am LD in spelling but thought I at least had an
understanding of the basic grammer rules.

John
 
We is not trashing you Phil. I has given that up. :)

John
Whether or not we accept the plural usage concept, I did notice an
inconsistency in Phils news headlines.
"Samsung breaks ..." singular
"Samsung have introduced ... " plural
and
"Agfa cuts price ..." singular
"Agfa have decided ..." plural
I suppose some argument could be made for different context, but being a
mathematician by training, I highly value consistency.
I'm just sitting here and enjoying been trashed by everyone.

Cheers guys.
 
I've been thinking about this since I read it yesterday. I don't think it is typical in England. Remember Winston Churchill's quote, "If the British Empire should last for a thousand years, let them say this IS its finest hour". Not ..let them say this ARE its finest hour. :)

John
But I'd like to hear (from you or someone else) if the plural usage is
typical in England, or British heritage countries, like someone else
suggested.

Keep up the good work :)

Don
I'm just sitting here and enjoying been trashed by everyone.

Cheers guys.
 
I would say I am not as bothered by spelling because I am a terrible speller. :) More then that though most mispellings are still readable phonetically. The meaning of the sentance is not affected.

John
A few hundred years ago in England, there were probably fewer rules to go
on when it came to grammar. Examining some of the literature of the
period reveals a lot of variation between different locales and stations
in life.

I'm surprised that you aren't even more bothered by the mistakes in
spelling, which tend to be far more glaring from post to post
(surprisingly, in this entire thread as well) than any problems with verb
tenses where even the "rules" allow for more leniency. :)
I will take your work for it, however when you have to cite sports
announcers as an authority on language usage you are on shaky ground. ;)
 
From http://www.eeicom.com/eye/family.html

Are your family well?

When was the last time you heard anybody other than the English use the latter construction? (The English, of course, believe every noun from government to Rolls-Royce takes a plural verb.)

So Phil's usage is perfectly fine according to the King's English, and we can excuse his occasional lapses to the singular due to the corrupting influence of associating with Americans and their degenerate grammar forms ;)

"Usage in the broad sense is always the determinant of correctness" - Dwight Bolinger, Usage and Acceptability in Language

Don
Whether or not we accept the plural usage concept, I did notice an
inconsistency in Phils news headlines.
"Samsung breaks ..." singular
"Samsung have introduced ... " plural
and
"Agfa cuts price ..." singular
"Agfa have decided ..." plural
I suppose some argument could be made for different context, but being a
mathematician by training, I highly value consistency.
I'm just sitting here and enjoying been trashed by everyone.

Cheers guys.
 
Don't take offense Phil. This thread is just a nice relief from the
"blues". Basically I like the plural usage (as you may have noted from
my posts). I've always hated the inconsistencies of the English language
rules and admired the much higher level of consistency in purer
languages such as the romance languages.

But I'd like to hear (from you or someone else) if the plural usage is
typical in England, or British heritage countries, like someone else
suggested.
It is, and I am... Often we'd say "Microsoft have produced a new version of their browser" in normal conversation, on written page etc...

For anyone who'd like to compare my use of english to that of other english people I'd refer you to:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/

A -much- better publication than c-n-n.
 
I've been thinking about this since I read it yesterday. I don't think
it is typical in England. Remember Winston Churchill's quote, "If the
British Empire should last for a thousand years, let them say this IS its
finest hour". Not ..let them say this ARE its finest hour. :)
Erm, and when have I ever said "this are" ?

Duh.

"The British have a better way of saying it"
 
We is not trashing you Phil. I has given that up. :)

John
John,

Your laboring this point is getting a bit obnoxious - it's OK to note your disagreement with the observed tendency, but you don't have to point a finger at specific persons, complaining that the person who has brought you this website cannot write correct English.

And by the way, the correct spellings are "grammar", not "grammer", and "visible", not "visable" (from your previous posts)

Michael
(not a native English speaker)
Whether or not we accept the plural usage concept, I did notice an
inconsistency in Phils news headlines.
"Samsung breaks ..." singular
"Samsung have introduced ... " plural
and
"Agfa cuts price ..." singular
"Agfa have decided ..." plural
I suppose some argument could be made for different context, but being a
mathematician by training, I highly value consistency.
I'm just sitting here and enjoying been trashed by everyone.

Cheers guys.
 
I've been thinking about this since I read it yesterday. I don't think
it is typical in England. Remember Winston Churchill's quote, "If the
British Empire should last for a thousand years, let them say this IS its
finest hour". Not ..let them say this ARE its finest hour. :)
Totally bogus example because the noun in the phrase is "this" (referring to "hour") and not "British Empire".

Don
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top