Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This might explain why Yodobashi Camera in Akihabara is sold out of 10 or so Canon EF lens at the moment without having reordered stock. I was thinking, it can't be because Canon is actually replacing all of them...but one never knows...Another thread mentioned that Canon is shifting production of
lenses to another new facility...this can of course disrupt stock
availability globally.
You are kidding? Right... Tried one in the store and my DO flies circles around it.I don't know why the 70-200/4 would dry up if Canon released an ISHe said that the rumour is that Canon is finally going to release
an IS version of the 70-200/4L.
version... that is, why keep both 2.8 versions in production and
drop the f4 non-IS? I have a hunch which one of the two non-IS
does the most sales.
Furthermore, Canon has the perfect 70-200 tele-zoom lineup right
now.
The 70-300IS has the optical quality and the IS,
--the 70-200 has the speed (a little at least) and the build... if you want it
all, Canon makes you $$$$ the piper. A 70-200/4IS would only take
sales from the 70-300IS, not generate a new market.
--
-CW
That is the first I have heard. Everything posted so far has indicated it is a match for the L's in the sharpness contrast department... so naturally I assumed that meant (the DO was out of contention and) it was a winner. I have no personal experience with the lens though, only the overwhelmingly positive feedback from these forums... and I have never shot with the DO either for that matter.You are kidding? Right... Tried one in the store and my DO fliesThe 70-300IS has the optical quality and the IS,
circles around it.
Well ... I'd disagree. Plenty of people in Japan can read English wellI doubt the guy would read these forums as he probably wouldn't
read English well enough.
So I guess you've compared the 70-300 head-to-head with at least one L? Because several others have shown such comparisons, and while the L's generally (not always) win, it ain't by any large margin.Your comments are laughable.
Not since you asked about it!There was buzz a while back of a step-up mid-zoom for the EF-S ...
ala Nikkor's DX 17-55/2.8
That rumour dead?
By that thinking the 85mm f1.2L would not exist....would Canon make 'THE' traditional 35mm photography lens in a
format that could only be accepted by a non-traditional camera? I
think you are full of it.
True enough. The 70-200/2.8 IS is pretty much already perfect, the only way to improve it really would be to give it away for free!I do believe new lenses are in the making, and as mentioned
somewhere in this thread 70-200 f4 IS is quite a possibility with a
24-105 f4 IS in place. I don't think the 70-200 2.8 IS will be
replaced though, there is no need for that I hope.