Why is my Mac so slow with NEF files?

Steve Feldman

Active member
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Location
US
Hi all,

I have an 800 Mhz G4 with 1 Gb memory. My main photo applications are Photoshop 7 and Nikon View 6 (I also just got Nikon Capture 4.1).

For years, my Mac has been fine (and not perceivably slow) dealing with .jpg files, no matter how big. I owned a CP8800 for a short while; the hi-res .jpg files are actually larger (or the same size) as my D70 NEF files.

I have no issues with .jpgs. For example, in Nikon View 6 I can select a group of hi-res .jpg's and run a slide show .. from picture to picture is very fast.

When I run the Nikon View slide show on NEF files, everything crawls. Likewise, I find that using Nikon Capture on NEF's is too slow, so slow that I cannot use it without being frustrated. Why is my computer so slow with NEF's? Is it due to the complexity of the NEF file itself .. that it stores 2 embedded .jpg files within it?

Any help is appreciated. If I can't find a solution, I'm going to sell my Nikon Capture software and go back to shooting hi-res .jpg files.

-s-
 
Hi all,

I have an 800 Mhz G4 with 1 Gb memory. My main photo applications
are Photoshop 7 and Nikon View 6 (I also just got Nikon Capture
4.1).

For years, my Mac has been fine (and not perceivably slow) dealing
with .jpg files, no matter how big. I owned a CP8800 for a short
while; the hi-res .jpg files are actually larger (or the same size)
as my D70 NEF files.

I have no issues with .jpgs. For example, in Nikon View 6 I can
select a group of hi-res .jpg's and run a slide show .. from
picture to picture is very fast.

When I run the Nikon View slide show on NEF files, everything
crawls. Likewise, I find that using Nikon Capture on NEF's is too
slow, so slow that I cannot use it without being frustrated. Why
is my computer so slow with NEF's? Is it due to the complexity of
the NEF file itself .. that it stores 2 embedded .jpg files within
it?

Any help is appreciated. If I can't find a solution, I'm going to
sell my Nikon Capture software and go back to shooting hi-res .jpg
files.

-s-
The problem is nikon Capture, not your Mac. I have a dual 1.25 G4 with 2 gig of RAM and capture is dreadfully slow. Try the Photoshop CS RAW conversion, it's fast. Capture one is Fast too and gives better results but is costly.
--
Chris Crawford
 
I have a Dual 1.8 GHz G5 with 1.5 MB RAM and working with NEF files in Capture is very slow. In fact, its not that much faster than my iBook G4 (1.33 GHz, with 768 MB RAM). Its not your Mac. I've also seen other posts from Windows users making the same observations (including those with fairly fast systems). Others have said that third-party NEF manipulation software is faster (e.g. Bibble) but I haven't tried those.

Even though it is sometimes painfully slow, I will still use Capture for controlling my D70 from my iBook, for downloading custom curves onto my D70 (I am not aware of any other software that can do that), and for batch processing RAW files. For that alone, the fairly inexpensive $99 charge has been worth it. Also, its not so bad when you are working with just one RAW file at a time.

Bottom line, Nikon software is very inefficient. I think if you are using Photoshop to manipulate RAW files, you may be using Nikon's RAW plugin, which bogs PS down. Not sure, but Nikon software all seems to plagued by almost unbelievably poor performance (although the features are great).
Hi all,

I have an 800 Mhz G4 with 1 Gb memory. My main photo applications
are Photoshop 7 and Nikon View 6 (I also just got Nikon Capture
4.1).

For years, my Mac has been fine (and not perceivably slow) dealing
with .jpg files, no matter how big. I owned a CP8800 for a short
while; the hi-res .jpg files are actually larger (or the same size)
as my D70 NEF files.

I have no issues with .jpgs. For example, in Nikon View 6 I can
select a group of hi-res .jpg's and run a slide show .. from
picture to picture is very fast.

When I run the Nikon View slide show on NEF files, everything
crawls. Likewise, I find that using Nikon Capture on NEF's is too
slow, so slow that I cannot use it without being frustrated. Why
is my computer so slow with NEF's? Is it due to the complexity of
the NEF file itself .. that it stores 2 embedded .jpg files within
it?

Any help is appreciated. If I can't find a solution, I'm going to
sell my Nikon Capture software and go back to shooting hi-res .jpg
files.

-s-
--
So many things to learn and so little time. Does that make me a dilettante?
 
Thanks Michael and Christopher for confirming that the problem is not my Mac!

Is it worth it, to shoot RAW, if it's so consuming to work with the files afterwards? A D70 hi-res jpg, processed in Photoshop 7, results in very nice photos that print quite well.

I'm new to NEF, to Nikon Capture, and thus to working with 12 or 16-bit files. Michael, it seems worth it to you -- you seem to process in batch to cope with it. I'll have to see if it's worth it to me, once I understand custom curves and all of the other features offered in the (slow) NEF world.

-s-
Even though it is sometimes painfully slow, I will still use
Capture for controlling my D70 from my iBook, for downloading
custom curves onto my D70 (I am not aware of any other software
that can do that), and for batch processing RAW files. For that
alone, the fairly inexpensive $99 charge has been worth it. Also,
its not so bad when you are working with just one RAW file at a
time.

Bottom line, Nikon software is very inefficient. I think if you
are using Photoshop to manipulate RAW files, you may be using
Nikon's RAW plugin, which bogs PS down. Not sure, but Nikon
software all seems to plagued by almost unbelievably poor
performance (although the features are great).
Hi all,

I have an 800 Mhz G4 with 1 Gb memory. My main photo applications
are Photoshop 7 and Nikon View 6 (I also just got Nikon Capture
4.1).

For years, my Mac has been fine (and not perceivably slow) dealing
with .jpg files, no matter how big. I owned a CP8800 for a short
while; the hi-res .jpg files are actually larger (or the same size)
as my D70 NEF files.

I have no issues with .jpgs. For example, in Nikon View 6 I can
select a group of hi-res .jpg's and run a slide show .. from
picture to picture is very fast.

When I run the Nikon View slide show on NEF files, everything
crawls. Likewise, I find that using Nikon Capture on NEF's is too
slow, so slow that I cannot use it without being frustrated. Why
is my computer so slow with NEF's? Is it due to the complexity of
the NEF file itself .. that it stores 2 embedded .jpg files within
it?

Any help is appreciated. If I can't find a solution, I'm going to
sell my Nikon Capture software and go back to shooting hi-res .jpg
files.

-s-
--
So many things to learn and so little time. Does that make me a
dilettante?
 
I would certainly agree with the previous posters, you're Mac is fine. We could all do with a faster processor, but we work with what we have.

I have a 17" PowerBook 1.5GHz 1Gb RAM, I only shoot RAW and use Photoshop CS. I use iPhoto to catalogue the files as they come in. The only restriction in iPhoto, really is that it can't render icons larger that 64x64 before they get jagged, but that's good enough to know which file to open in the Photoshop browser.

I gave up on JPEG files when I discovered the level of control with the RAW plug in. If you have anything better than the standard speed CF card, the speed of writing and transfer should be fine. Use a 1Gb card and you should get about 150 RAW inages (IIRC), consideralbly more than the counter suggests.

Give RAW a good chance, I don't think you'll look back.
Is it worth it, to shoot RAW, if it's so consuming to work with the
files afterwards? A D70 hi-res jpg, processed in Photoshop 7,
results in very nice photos that print quite well.

I'm new to NEF, to Nikon Capture, and thus to working with 12 or
16-bit files. Michael, it seems worth it to you -- you seem to
process in batch to cope with it. I'll have to see if it's worth
it to me, once I understand custom curves and all of the other
features offered in the (slow) NEF world.

-s-
Even though it is sometimes painfully slow, I will still use
Capture for controlling my D70 from my iBook, for downloading
custom curves onto my D70 (I am not aware of any other software
that can do that), and for batch processing RAW files. For that
alone, the fairly inexpensive $99 charge has been worth it. Also,
its not so bad when you are working with just one RAW file at a
time.

Bottom line, Nikon software is very inefficient. I think if you
are using Photoshop to manipulate RAW files, you may be using
Nikon's RAW plugin, which bogs PS down. Not sure, but Nikon
software all seems to plagued by almost unbelievably poor
performance (although the features are great).
Hi all,

I have an 800 Mhz G4 with 1 Gb memory. My main photo applications
are Photoshop 7 and Nikon View 6 (I also just got Nikon Capture
4.1).

For years, my Mac has been fine (and not perceivably slow) dealing
with .jpg files, no matter how big. I owned a CP8800 for a short
while; the hi-res .jpg files are actually larger (or the same size)
as my D70 NEF files.

I have no issues with .jpgs. For example, in Nikon View 6 I can
select a group of hi-res .jpg's and run a slide show .. from
picture to picture is very fast.

When I run the Nikon View slide show on NEF files, everything
crawls. Likewise, I find that using Nikon Capture on NEF's is too
slow, so slow that I cannot use it without being frustrated. Why
is my computer so slow with NEF's? Is it due to the complexity of
the NEF file itself .. that it stores 2 embedded .jpg files within
it?

Any help is appreciated. If I can't find a solution, I'm going to
sell my Nikon Capture software and go back to shooting hi-res .jpg
files.

-s-
--
So many things to learn and so little time. Does that make me a
dilettante?
--
Dave

D70
18-70 kit lens
105 Macro
75-300 push pull
Tamron 2x Teleconvertor
SB-800

Move quietly through life... like a fish

Grow or Die
Bob Wiseman
 
Dave, does Photoshop CS work natively with NEF files? I assume this is a newer version than Photoshop 7.0. Vers 7.0 is clumsy with the Nikon RAW plugin. And as I said, Nikon Capture is slow too.

Maybe I should upgrade to Photoshop CS?
I have a 17" PowerBook 1.5GHz 1Gb RAM, I only shoot RAW and use
Photoshop CS. I use iPhoto to catalogue the files as they come in.
The only restriction in iPhoto, really is that it can't render
icons larger that 64x64 before they get jagged, but that's good
enough to know which file to open in the Photoshop browser.

I gave up on JPEG files when I discovered the level of control with
the RAW plug in. If you have anything better than the standard
speed CF card, the speed of writing and transfer should be fine.
Use a 1Gb card and you should get about 150 RAW inages (IIRC),
consideralbly more than the counter suggests.

Give RAW a good chance, I don't think you'll look back.
Is it worth it, to shoot RAW, if it's so consuming to work with the
files afterwards? A D70 hi-res jpg, processed in Photoshop 7,
results in very nice photos that print quite well.

I'm new to NEF, to Nikon Capture, and thus to working with 12 or
16-bit files. Michael, it seems worth it to you -- you seem to
process in batch to cope with it. I'll have to see if it's worth
it to me, once I understand custom curves and all of the other
features offered in the (slow) NEF world.

-s-
Even though it is sometimes painfully slow, I will still use
Capture for controlling my D70 from my iBook, for downloading
custom curves onto my D70 (I am not aware of any other software
that can do that), and for batch processing RAW files. For that
alone, the fairly inexpensive $99 charge has been worth it. Also,
its not so bad when you are working with just one RAW file at a
time.

Bottom line, Nikon software is very inefficient. I think if you
are using Photoshop to manipulate RAW files, you may be using
Nikon's RAW plugin, which bogs PS down. Not sure, but Nikon
software all seems to plagued by almost unbelievably poor
performance (although the features are great).
Hi all,

I have an 800 Mhz G4 with 1 Gb memory. My main photo applications
are Photoshop 7 and Nikon View 6 (I also just got Nikon Capture
4.1).

For years, my Mac has been fine (and not perceivably slow) dealing
with .jpg files, no matter how big. I owned a CP8800 for a short
while; the hi-res .jpg files are actually larger (or the same size)
as my D70 NEF files.

I have no issues with .jpgs. For example, in Nikon View 6 I can
select a group of hi-res .jpg's and run a slide show .. from
picture to picture is very fast.

When I run the Nikon View slide show on NEF files, everything
crawls. Likewise, I find that using Nikon Capture on NEF's is too
slow, so slow that I cannot use it without being frustrated. Why
is my computer so slow with NEF's? Is it due to the complexity of
the NEF file itself .. that it stores 2 embedded .jpg files within
it?

Any help is appreciated. If I can't find a solution, I'm going to
sell my Nikon Capture software and go back to shooting hi-res .jpg
files.

-s-
--
So many things to learn and so little time. Does that make me a
dilettante?
--
Dave

D70
18-70 kit lens
105 Macro
75-300 push pull
Tamron 2x Teleconvertor
SB-800

Move quietly through life... like a fish

Grow or Die
Bob Wiseman
 
Dave, does Photoshop CS work natively with NEF files? I assume
this is a newer version than Photoshop 7.0. Vers 7.0 is clumsy
with the Nikon RAW plugin. And as I said, Nikon Capture is slow
too.

Maybe I should upgrade to Photoshop CS?
Yes it does but you have to remove the stupid nikon RAW plugin that gets installed in Photoshop by Nikon capture (it gets installed when you install capture). This plugin keeps Adobe's very excellent Camera RAW plugin from working, and camera RAW is what you want to use. It's fast and good and it is part of Photoshop CS
--
Chris Crawford
 
Yes CS is the current version, but Macworld has just opened so that could change.

If you have the $$$ for the upgrade it's definitely worth it, a big improvement. Faster all round especially the file browser. You'll need to download a newer version of the RAW plug-in, then remove the NIKON plug-in as well as the old Adobe one, to avoid confusion. One file one plug-in.
Maybe I should upgrade to Photoshop CS?
I have a 17" PowerBook 1.5GHz 1Gb RAM, I only shoot RAW and use
Photoshop CS. I use iPhoto to catalogue the files as they come in.
The only restriction in iPhoto, really is that it can't render
icons larger that 64x64 before they get jagged, but that's good
enough to know which file to open in the Photoshop browser.

I gave up on JPEG files when I discovered the level of control with
the RAW plug in. If you have anything better than the standard
speed CF card, the speed of writing and transfer should be fine.
Use a 1Gb card and you should get about 150 RAW inages (IIRC),
consideralbly more than the counter suggests.

Give RAW a good chance, I don't think you'll look back.
Is it worth it, to shoot RAW, if it's so consuming to work with the
files afterwards? A D70 hi-res jpg, processed in Photoshop 7,
results in very nice photos that print quite well.

I'm new to NEF, to Nikon Capture, and thus to working with 12 or
16-bit files. Michael, it seems worth it to you -- you seem to
process in batch to cope with it. I'll have to see if it's worth
it to me, once I understand custom curves and all of the other
features offered in the (slow) NEF world.

-s-
Even though it is sometimes painfully slow, I will still use
Capture for controlling my D70 from my iBook, for downloading
custom curves onto my D70 (I am not aware of any other software
that can do that), and for batch processing RAW files. For that
alone, the fairly inexpensive $99 charge has been worth it. Also,
its not so bad when you are working with just one RAW file at a
time.

Bottom line, Nikon software is very inefficient. I think if you
are using Photoshop to manipulate RAW files, you may be using
Nikon's RAW plugin, which bogs PS down. Not sure, but Nikon
software all seems to plagued by almost unbelievably poor
performance (although the features are great).
Hi all,

I have an 800 Mhz G4 with 1 Gb memory. My main photo applications
are Photoshop 7 and Nikon View 6 (I also just got Nikon Capture
4.1).

For years, my Mac has been fine (and not perceivably slow) dealing
with .jpg files, no matter how big. I owned a CP8800 for a short
while; the hi-res .jpg files are actually larger (or the same size)
as my D70 NEF files.

I have no issues with .jpgs. For example, in Nikon View 6 I can
select a group of hi-res .jpg's and run a slide show .. from
picture to picture is very fast.

When I run the Nikon View slide show on NEF files, everything
crawls. Likewise, I find that using Nikon Capture on NEF's is too
slow, so slow that I cannot use it without being frustrated. Why
is my computer so slow with NEF's? Is it due to the complexity of
the NEF file itself .. that it stores 2 embedded .jpg files within
it?

Any help is appreciated. If I can't find a solution, I'm going to
sell my Nikon Capture software and go back to shooting hi-res .jpg
files.

-s-
--
So many things to learn and so little time. Does that make me a
dilettante?
--
Dave

D70
18-70 kit lens
105 Macro
75-300 push pull
Tamron 2x Teleconvertor
SB-800

Move quietly through life... like a fish

Grow or Die
Bob Wiseman
--
Dave

D70
18-70 kit lens
105 Macro
75-300 push pull
Tamron 2x Teleconvertor
SB-800

Move quietly through life... like a fish

Grow or Die
Bob Wiseman
 
PSE 3. I download to iPhoto NEF + basic jpg and have iPhoto to open with double click in Elements 3. I find it much faster.
Hi all,

I have an 800 Mhz G4 with 1 Gb memory. My main photo applications
are Photoshop 7 and Nikon View 6 (I also just got Nikon Capture
4.1).

For years, my Mac has been fine (and not perceivably slow) dealing
with .jpg files, no matter how big. I owned a CP8800 for a short
while; the hi-res .jpg files are actually larger (or the same size)
as my D70 NEF files.

I have no issues with .jpgs. For example, in Nikon View 6 I can
select a group of hi-res .jpg's and run a slide show .. from
picture to picture is very fast.

When I run the Nikon View slide show on NEF files, everything
crawls. Likewise, I find that using Nikon Capture on NEF's is too
slow, so slow that I cannot use it without being frustrated. Why
is my computer so slow with NEF's? Is it due to the complexity of
the NEF file itself .. that it stores 2 embedded .jpg files within
it?

Any help is appreciated. If I can't find a solution, I'm going to
sell my Nikon Capture software and go back to shooting hi-res .jpg
files.

-s-
--
If it’s looking easy it means you didn’t read the instructions manual
 
Hi all,

I have an 800 Mhz G4 with 1 Gb memory. My main photo applications
are Photoshop 7 and Nikon View 6 (I also just got Nikon Capture
4.1).

For years, my Mac has been fine (and not perceivably slow) dealing
with .jpg files, no matter how big. I owned a CP8800 for a short
while; the hi-res .jpg files are actually larger (or the same size)
as my D70 NEF files.

I have no issues with .jpgs. For example, in Nikon View 6 I can
select a group of hi-res .jpg's and run a slide show .. from
picture to picture is very fast.

When I run the Nikon View slide show on NEF files, everything
crawls. Likewise, I find that using Nikon Capture on NEF's is too
slow, so slow that I cannot use it without being frustrated. Why
is my computer so slow with NEF's? Is it due to the complexity of
the NEF file itself .. that it stores 2 embedded .jpg files within
it?

Any help is appreciated. If I can't find a solution, I'm going to
sell my Nikon Capture software and go back to shooting hi-res .jpg
files.

-s-
I have an old Blue & White G3 350MHz(upgraded to 550mhz G4) running OSX 10.2.8. You want to talk about slow? iPhoto won't even rasterize an .nef. What I do that seems to work really well is Photoshop CS or even PS 7's file browser. It's a hell of alot faster than any tool out there. Here's why it works for me: In Preferences> Memory/Cache I set the max memory to 75% ( I wouldn't go any greater) The more memory the better it seemed to work.

I bought my B&W in 1999, and after nearly six years this Hog is still chugging along. Long story short, if my 550 mhz extremely outdated Mac can still push Photoshop (course the rendering takes forever) than yours should be sufficient.

Hopefully next year I'll be getting the new 3.x Ghz PowerMac G5. (dreamfully!)
 
The Nikon RAW conversion is really slow. However, to make life with RAW files easier, don't forget the batch feature of Nikon Capture. I take all my pictures in RAW and then batch convert them to jpegs and use these to view on screen and for slide shows. Whenever I want to print something or adjust things, I go back to the RAW file in Nikon Capture and adjust things manually for that particular image. This way the slowness of Nikon Capture is not too frustrating.

Joakim

PS. Running on a PB G4 1.5 GHz with 1 GB of memory.
Hi all,

I have an 800 Mhz G4 with 1 Gb memory. My main photo applications
are Photoshop 7 and Nikon View 6 (I also just got Nikon Capture
4.1).

For years, my Mac has been fine (and not perceivably slow) dealing
with .jpg files, no matter how big. I owned a CP8800 for a short
while; the hi-res .jpg files are actually larger (or the same size)
as my D70 NEF files.

I have no issues with .jpgs. For example, in Nikon View 6 I can
select a group of hi-res .jpg's and run a slide show .. from
picture to picture is very fast.

When I run the Nikon View slide show on NEF files, everything
crawls. Likewise, I find that using Nikon Capture on NEF's is too
slow, so slow that I cannot use it without being frustrated. Why
is my computer so slow with NEF's? Is it due to the complexity of
the NEF file itself .. that it stores 2 embedded .jpg files within
it?

Any help is appreciated. If I can't find a solution, I'm going to
sell my Nikon Capture software and go back to shooting hi-res .jpg
files.

-s-
 
Nikon Capture is quite poky on my dual 800 G4 (1 GB/10.3.7) - I gave up on it after the trial period ended and use Photoshop CS when I want to convert Raw files. It's a shame that there's no way other than Capture to upload custom curves to the D70, though.
 
Any help is appreciated. If I can't find a solution, I'm going to
sell my Nikon Capture software and go back to shooting hi-res .jpg
files.
If you're annoyed with the initial conversion of NEF to TIF, why not set it as a batch and go do other things while the computer generates the TIFs. You are batching these, right?
 
Yes it does but you have to remove the stupid nikon RAW plugin that
gets installed in Photoshop by Nikon capture (it gets installed
when you install capture). This plugin keeps Adobe's very
excellent Camera RAW plugin from working, and camera RAW is what
you want to use. It's fast and good and it is part of Photoshop CS
It should be mentioned that Adobe's RAW plugin generates vastly different images that Nikon Capture's. It ignores in-camera sharpening, and the images are much flatter and in general lifeless compared to Nikon Capture. Give it a try yourself, you will see.
 
Slow for me too on a relatively new G4 ibook with PS 7.

I took the advice of forum thread about three months back on work-flow which suggested doing the first cut of shots using the basic jpgs, and then loading the chosen NEFs into PS. Saves me a lot of time - or at least means I don't have to spend the ENTIRE day processing.

Interested in the idea of replacing Nikon RAW processing with Adobe plug-in. Does anyone have the time to talk me through how you go about this and how much faster is it?

Cheers - BT
Hi all,

I have an 800 Mhz G4 with 1 Gb memory. My main photo applications
are Photoshop 7 and Nikon View 6 (I also just got Nikon Capture
4.1).

For years, my Mac has been fine (and not perceivably slow) dealing
with .jpg files, no matter how big. I owned a CP8800 for a short
while; the hi-res .jpg files are actually larger (or the same size)
as my D70 NEF files.

I have no issues with .jpgs. For example, in Nikon View 6 I can
select a group of hi-res .jpg's and run a slide show .. from
picture to picture is very fast.

When I run the Nikon View slide show on NEF files, everything
crawls. Likewise, I find that using Nikon Capture on NEF's is too
slow, so slow that I cannot use it without being frustrated. Why
is my computer so slow with NEF's? Is it due to the complexity of
the NEF file itself .. that it stores 2 embedded .jpg files within
it?

Any help is appreciated. If I can't find a solution, I'm going to
sell my Nikon Capture software and go back to shooting hi-res .jpg
files.

-s-
 
Hi everybody,

I've been reluctant to shoot in raw too because of the slowness of processing afterward. It's been painful to import into photoshop and wait and wait wait. I use iview media pro to catalogue and that works very very swiftly though.

I just followed the advice earlier to REMOVE nikon .nef plugin everywhere and what a tremendous different that makes! I somehow thought that the nikon raw import was the photoshop beta camera raw, even though it didn't really look like it. Using Photoshop raw plugin, importing raw files is now acceptably fast and I no longer will feel that frustration. If you haven't already, get rid of the nikon nef file plugin and make sure you're using PS camera raw.

Good luck. BTW, I have a powerbook G4 1ghz/512mb so it should be even better on a faster machine.
Hi all,

I have an 800 Mhz G4 with 1 Gb memory. My main photo applications
are Photoshop 7 and Nikon View 6 (I also just got Nikon Capture
4.1).

For years, my Mac has been fine (and not perceivably slow) dealing
with .jpg files, no matter how big. I owned a CP8800 for a short
while; the hi-res .jpg files are actually larger (or the same size)
as my D70 NEF files.

I have no issues with .jpgs. For example, in Nikon View 6 I can
select a group of hi-res .jpg's and run a slide show .. from
picture to picture is very fast.

When I run the Nikon View slide show on NEF files, everything
crawls. Likewise, I find that using Nikon Capture on NEF's is too
slow, so slow that I cannot use it without being frustrated. Why
is my computer so slow with NEF's? Is it due to the complexity of
the NEF file itself .. that it stores 2 embedded .jpg files within
it?

Any help is appreciated. If I can't find a solution, I'm going to
sell my Nikon Capture software and go back to shooting hi-res .jpg
files.

-s-
 
Depending on which version of the nikon software you are using, Bibble is 6 to 10 times faster. There is no faster way to process raw files on the macintosh.

http://www.bibblelabs.com

Bibble is one of the few programs fully optimized to take advantage of your mac, and actually is faster at processing raw files then similar PC's, Check apples site for details:

http://www.apple.com/powermac/performance/

(The page is about the G5, but similar results happen on the G4)

Eric
Hi all,

I have an 800 Mhz G4 with 1 Gb memory. My main photo applications
are Photoshop 7 and Nikon View 6 (I also just got Nikon Capture
4.1).

For years, my Mac has been fine (and not perceivably slow) dealing
with .jpg files, no matter how big. I owned a CP8800 for a short
while; the hi-res .jpg files are actually larger (or the same size)
as my D70 NEF files.

I have no issues with .jpgs. For example, in Nikon View 6 I can
select a group of hi-res .jpg's and run a slide show .. from
picture to picture is very fast.

When I run the Nikon View slide show on NEF files, everything
crawls. Likewise, I find that using Nikon Capture on NEF's is too
slow, so slow that I cannot use it without being frustrated. Why
is my computer so slow with NEF's? Is it due to the complexity of
the NEF file itself .. that it stores 2 embedded .jpg files within
it?

Any help is appreciated. If I can't find a solution, I'm going to
sell my Nikon Capture software and go back to shooting hi-res .jpg
files.

-s-
 
Yes it does but you have to remove the stupid nikon RAW plugin that
gets installed in Photoshop by Nikon capture (it gets installed
when you install capture). This plugin keeps Adobe's very
excellent Camera RAW plugin from working, and camera RAW is what
you want to use. It's fast and good and it is part of Photoshop CS
It should be mentioned that Adobe's RAW plugin generates vastly
different images that Nikon Capture's. It ignores in-camera
sharpening, and the images are much flatter and in general lifeless
compared to Nikon Capture. Give it a try yourself, you will see.
I have. The problem is it ignores the in camera tone curves and yet doesn't have an alternative curve of it's own (like capture one does) so the pics do look flat till you bring them into Photoshop and increase the contrast with a manual curve adjustment. not hard, and then they look fine
--
Chris Crawford
 
Joakim, I will try this. It makes sense. I didn't want to shoot RAW + JPEG because I don't want basic quality JPEGs. With batching, I can solve this problem .. I'll give it a try.
Joakim

PS. Running on a PB G4 1.5 GHz with 1 GB of memory.
Hi all,

I have an 800 Mhz G4 with 1 Gb memory. My main photo applications
are Photoshop 7 and Nikon View 6 (I also just got Nikon Capture
4.1).

For years, my Mac has been fine (and not perceivably slow) dealing
with .jpg files, no matter how big. I owned a CP8800 for a short
while; the hi-res .jpg files are actually larger (or the same size)
as my D70 NEF files.

I have no issues with .jpgs. For example, in Nikon View 6 I can
select a group of hi-res .jpg's and run a slide show .. from
picture to picture is very fast.

When I run the Nikon View slide show on NEF files, everything
crawls. Likewise, I find that using Nikon Capture on NEF's is too
slow, so slow that I cannot use it without being frustrated. Why
is my computer so slow with NEF's? Is it due to the complexity of
the NEF file itself .. that it stores 2 embedded .jpg files within
it?

Any help is appreciated. If I can't find a solution, I'm going to
sell my Nikon Capture software and go back to shooting hi-res .jpg
files.

-s-
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top