DonParrot
Senior Member
Hm, with both the E-M5 MKI and the E-M-1 MKI the C-AF was better than what we could expect. No overoptmistic promises or marketing videos like the ones we are used to be provided with by Sony and no misleading videos on 4K photography as the ones of Panny that made you believe that you now could shoot a fishing Kingfisher just like that. So, I'm confident that the MKII also will surpass my expectations.Hold on. Wait.
We do not know yet how good its autofocus system actually is.
They are advertising incredible specs — what was it, 18 fps with continuous autofocus? But as with every new camera release, I'm sure this comes with a giant "but" — in this case, it's probably the burst rate with the electronic shutter, that's prone to the notorious "jello effect."
And if you take a look at Robin Wong's burst of the Macaw you can see that the rolling shutter effect is virtually neglectable even when panning.
Let's wait and see.The big Canon and Nikon flagships are proven workhorses. Their autofocus systems are still unmatched by any mirrorless camera, at least for certain subjects and circumstances.
So what. 10 batteries still will be clearly lighter than obe of the FF flagships.The battery life they provide is still at least double or triple of what we get with our mirrorless cameras.
Well, neither the 1Dx MKII nor the D5 have got world-class IBIS, Hi Res mode, on-board focus stacking, live composite, a proper sensor-cleaning system and more. So, the E-M1 MKII has got clearly more to go for than the flagships of the big two.There is great progress being made by Olympus and the other major players, but no one can justifiably make the claim that the E-M1 Mark II has everything the D5 / 1D-X II have but with a smaller sensor. At least not yet, when we've just learned how much it costs, and reviewers have only had a chance to play with it for barely a day.