lighttoart
Member
Is everyone with the x100 lens hood finding a difference in their photos? Is it worth
the extra depth added to the camera body?
Mickey
the extra depth added to the camera body?
Mickey
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ken R. disagreesa lens hood is always a good idea.
--
This has been my experience with both internal and external flash.try turning the hood so the vents are in a different spot perhaps
on mine it was no issue with the flash, except at minimum focal distances, but at normal shooting there were no shadows that I saw. Flash spreads out just fine
--
http://www.millsartphotography.com
One of the biggest reasons I bought the x100 was its size....Is everyone with the x100 lens hood finding a difference in their photos? Is it worth
the extra depth added to the camera body?
Mickey
I always use a hood. It protects the lens from physical damage and prevents flare caused by light hitting the lens from the side. To answer your specific question, I have not seen a difference, because the hood is rarely off my camera.Is everyone with the x100 lens hood finding a difference in their photos? Is it worth
the extra depth added to the camera body?
Why? Did you street shoot aggressive hoods in your 'hood with your hood on?My camera feels to aggressive with the hood on.
--
Which pretty much means that it is indeed a good ideaKen R. disagreesa lens hood is always a good idea.![]()
I was just kidding. I actually agree with you. I think of a case as something to protect the camera until you get to where you want to take pictures. Then its just a pain you have to deal with until you are finished shooting. I would never get one of those always-on cases.no, it's just a silly thing to put on a camera, so i do not use a case. it is at rest. all i use are a strap, a screen protector, a uv filter, and a lens hood. no case.