Z Auto ISO + Program Mode challenges

patrol_taking_9j

Well-known member
Messages
148
Reaction score
162
Location
US
Just picked up a new Z6 III, I'm having some challenges with how I expect program mode to work, specifically with its interaction with Auto ISO.

I come from Canon DSLR's, but I don't have one of those available at the moment to do a sanity check.

I used to shoot primarily in Aperture-Priority mode, but the last few months have been moving towards P(rogram) mode. I've actually found this to be really helpful. As I recall on Canon bodies, in program, with Auto ISO engaged, the camera meters the scene. Then, you turn the main dial and shift the selected exposure, either direction.

Let's say the camera says 1/60 F5.6, ISO 400. Turn the main dial and you can shift to 1/120 F4 ISO 400, or maybe you want to go the other direction so you turn it that way and oops, you've run into your minimum shutter speed limit. Canon cameras will go ok, here's 1/60 F6.3 ISO 800, but as far as I can tell the Nikon's just sit there and do nothing and refuse to let you shift, or worse they shift but reduce the shutter speed.

This way of operating Program mode is great because it lets the photographer decide instantly how they'd like to bias the capture along the aperture and shutter axis, more shutter speed or more aperture, so that you have the best chance of doing whatever you need to. Faster to stop motion/eliminate blur, larger aperture for more separation, or less aperture for more depth. At least this is how I've thought about it for awhile now.

The Z6 is giving me fits and starts. In Nikon land w/ Auto ISO, ISO sensitivity sets the minimum ISO desired. But Program mode refuses to move the ISO up in response to Program shift, it will always attempt to find the minimum ISO required to meet the minimum shutter speed. If you hit your maximum aperture available, auto iso will raise the ISO to 1/setminimum @ maximum aperture and not allow you to ask it for more.

So two questions. Does the Canon P mode work the way I remember it? Is there a way to get this functionality on a Nikon Z?
 
Welcome to the forum and the Nikon family. I'd like to hear your favorite things about the Z6III having come from Canon too. ;)

Nikon is different, and it isn't documented very well. I'd be curious to see Thom Hogan's guide on the modes. I'm sure someone else might offer a better suggestion, so I'll be watching this thread too.

I've been shooting Aperture for the longest time, usually wide open, but I am now shifting towards Shutter priority. Either I want to stop the action or drag the shutter, and auto-ISO does the reset. With a good workflow and software I have no fear using 10,000 ISO either.

Nikon's Program is auto mode with a little more control. I use it (RARELY) as Green/Auto but with my white balance, picture control, and other settings, or when I hand the camera off to a family member. It always seemed like a Bermuda (exposure) Triangle to me. To see how Nikon Program mode works, turn off auto-ISO and then rotate the dials, and rotate them A LOT. I think you'd be much better off shooting Manual mode with auto ISO. I've shot Canon and Sony as well, and rarely if ever used Program or Tv on them.

I think it makes more sense to have U1 aperture priority (general,) U2 shutter priority (sports, theater to avoid LED flicker,) and U3 manual (tripod). PASM can work as a fourth mode, but I never remember how I left it, so I rarely use it. The way to reset that is to restore your saved settings from your card before each shoot.

--
SkyRunR
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
“Stop down and smell the roses.”
 
Last edited:
Nikon programed auto exposure (P) allows you to select from a variety of combinations of aperture (f-stop) and exposure time (shutter speed) that produce the same exposure. Use the main command dial to rotate through the available combinations.

8c393cd3a47746439bd721a3ab188864.jpg

ISO will not and should not change. P mode is designed to deliver a constant exposure using a variety of f-stop and shutter speed combos. In manual ISO mode, you can use exposure compensation (EC) to force the camera to produce an exposure other than what it determines is needed through metering.

In auto ISO mode, you can use EC to adjust image lightness while keeping exposure constant.

Link to Z6III "Reference Guide": https://onlinemanual.nikonimglib.com/z6III/en/

--
Bill Ferris Photography
Flagstaff, AZ
 
Last edited:
I am not a fan of Auto ISO because you are allowing the camera to fiddle to much with your intended settings. In addition I've noticed that Nikon's implementation goes way way overboard on boosting the shutter speeds with longer focal lengths. In a day when we have Image Stabilization why does Nikon feel it's necessary to have the shutter speed at 1/4000 second for a 500mm lens?

When you turn the Auto ISO off then you will find the Program mode works exactly as you expect. You will also see a direct connection between the Aperture and Shutter speed when you are in either the A or S modes. Which pretty much makes the Program mode redundant.

Note, back in the Film Days most photographers use the A mode when using auto exposure. Because back then we had Aperture rings on the lenses and you could shift the shutter speed by turning the Aperture ring with the LEFT Hand. This allowed shooters to keep their index finger on the shutter release. Because back then a shot missed due to the index finger being used to turn a dial meant that you failed to "get the shot".
 
Experimenting with Program mode on my Z6 iii:

It's set to Auto ISO, range 100 to 6400. using the 24-120 f/4 lens.

Outdoors in sunlight:

It's at the base 100 auto ISO.

The rear command dial moves the aperture through it range, and changes the shutter speeds to keep the same exposure.

It appears that once the auto ISO is raised above the minimum, it's already at minimum shutter speed for the focal length and wide open aperture. So it won't change the shutter to a "too low" speed to work with a smaller aperture. No change allowed.

It's interesting that a fast scroll of the command dial doesn't zip through the apertures. Instead, there seems to be a small lag or delay, so a slow click of the command dial is more effective. This slow response is quite annoying, I think.

Trying a very dark indoor area, it's at max auto ISO, and wide open aperture. Since it's too dark for a correct exposure, the shutter speed can drop way below the calculated minimum speed for that lens, just like it does in Aperture mode.

Warning: I press ISO and use the front command dial to switch to ISO from auto ISO, then the rear command dial raises the ISO -- I tried 1600 ISO for example. BUT, if I now switch back to auto ISO, the base is changed to this 1600 instead of 100. I suppose this makes some sense, but it can really cause problems if I don't pay attention.
 
It appears that once the auto ISO is raised above the minimum, it's already at minimum shutter speed for the focal length and wide open aperture. So it won't change the shutter to a "too low" speed to work with a smaller aperture. No change allowed.

It's interesting that a fast scroll of the command dial doesn't zip through the apertures. Instead, there seems to be a small lag or delay, so a slow click of the command dial is more effective. This slow response is quite annoying, I think.

Trying a very dark indoor area, it's at max auto ISO, and wide open aperture. Since it's too dark for a correct exposure, the shutter speed can drop way below the calculated minimum speed for that lens, just like it does in Aperture mode.

Warning: I press ISO and use the front command dial to switch to ISO from auto ISO, then the rear command dial raises the ISO -- I tried 1600 ISO for example. BUT, if I now switch back to auto ISO, the base is changed to this 1600 instead of 100. I suppose this makes some sense, but it can really cause problems if I don't pay attention.
Thanks all for the warm welcome.

This is the crux of what I feel to be the issue. Once Auto ISO raises your ISO above your set minimum, the camera will refuse to raise the ISO any further to support your call for greater shutter speed, indicated by turning changing through the program shift modes. I'm pretty sure Canon's will, though.

I wonder if perhaps it works in the other direction, but I suspect not. If I leave it at ISO 8000 minimum will it lower the ISO past that. Don't think so.

I've sort of worked around this by setting ISO to the function dial at the rear of the lens, but it feel kind of a kludge. I'll have to experiment some more.

Also noticed the seemingly delayed response for Program Shift, I'm not sure why it's so slow. On all my previous cameras (granted all DSLR's), program shift was instantaneous. Very annoying to slow click.

Edit: I see on the new Canon's they have Flexible Priority mode now, which I think is pretty much exactly what I'm describing.
 
Last edited:
I have my Z6III and Z9's set to Manual with Auto ISO. I don't think I've ever used Program Mode.

I find it easy enough to use the front and back control wheels to adjust shutter speed and aperture on the fly. Many users work in this way and it becomes second nature after a while.

I shoot aircraft with long telephotos and have the problem of needing a slow shutter speed to get decent propeller blur while keeping the lens close to wide open (f2.8 or f4) to maximize performance. In the Southern California sun I often come up against the low ISO barrier, so have to use a ND filter.
 
Let's say the camera says 1/60 F5.6, ISO 400. Turn the main dial and you can shift to 1/120 F4 ISO 400, or maybe you want to go the other direction so you turn it that way and oops, you've run into your minimum shutter speed limit.
According to the Z6II Reference Guide, when in P mode, you can "Choose the shutter speed below which auto ISO sensitivity control will kick in to prevent underexposure in modes P and A; options range from ¹/₈₀₀₀ to 30 s. If [Auto] is selected, the camera will choose the minimum shutter speed based on lens focal length."

It seems you should be able to manually select a minimum shutter speed that doesn't limit your ability to dial in a combination of f-stop and shutter speed that suits you.
 
According to the Z6II Reference Guide, when in P mode, you can "Choose the shutter speed below which auto ISO sensitivity control will kick in to prevent underexposure in modes P and A; options range from ¹/₈₀₀₀ to 30 s. If [Auto] is selected, the camera will choose the minimum shutter speed based on lens focal length."
Yup, this is true, but it's unfortunately buried kind of deep in the menus. Not something to easily change on the fly.

But this thread has helped me zero in on exactly what's giving me trouble. Program will attempt to maintain exposure by slowing shutter speed and widening the aperture until you reach maximum aperture of your lens. Once there, Auto ISO only gives you enough ISO to make 1/selectedmin @ Max aperture, regardless if that selected Auto ISO is lower than the set maximum. I want to be able to ask for more shutter speed and for Auto ISO to raise the ISO higher, still respecting my set limits.

It just seems strange to me to have this artificial constraint. Program is a very useful mode and could be much more widely adopted if this behavior was fixed.

If anyone has a modern Canon nearby I'd appreciate if they could check this too.

Edit: Amended version of my initial take describing the issue:

Let's say the camera says 1/60 F5.6, ISO 400. Turn the main dial and you can shift to 1/120 F4 ISO 400, then 1/240 F4 ISO 800, all the way until you hit your auto ISO limit. The Nikons will not raise the ISO in response to your Program shift, so you'll be stuck at 1/120 F4 ISO 400, with no faster shutter available.

Or maybe you want to go the other direction so you turn it that way and oops, you've run into your minimum shutter speed limit. Canon cameras will go ok, here's 1/60 F6.3 ISO 800, but as far as I can tell the Nikon's just sit there and do nothing and refuse to let you shift, or worse they shift but reduce the shutter speed.
 
Last edited:
Another thing to add here, the reason this bothers me so much is that I suspect it prevents a lot of users from easily exploiting one of the main benefits of modern full frame sensors and image processors, their incredible ISO sensitivity and performance. Every day of the week and twice on Sunday's I would trade off a higher ISO for a faster shutter speed. It's why I went full frame.

Thanks to some other posts that suggested Manual with Auto ISO. It's not great, and it's definitely a slower way of shooting, but it gets closer. It will allow you to set a higher shutter and therefore set a higher ISO for correct exposure. Also it proves that the logic to do this already exists in the camera, and that the current frustration is software, as it always is.
 
I am not a fan of Auto ISO because you are allowing the camera to fiddle to much with your intended settings. In addition I've noticed that Nikon's implementation goes way way overboard on boosting the shutter speeds with longer focal lengths. In a day when we have Image Stabilization why does Nikon feel it's necessary to have the shutter speed at 1/4000 second for a 500mm lens?
I don't find that, but for moving subjects ibis isn't helping much other than in creative shots and the viewfinder. In any event you can select the ratio in the menus.
 
According to the Z6II Reference Guide, when in P mode, you can "Choose the shutter speed below which auto ISO sensitivity control will kick in to prevent underexposure in modes P and A; options range from ¹/₈₀₀₀ to 30 s. If [Auto] is selected, the camera will choose the minimum shutter speed based on lens focal length."
Yup, this is true, but it's unfortunately buried kind of deep in the menus. Not something to easily change on the fly.
Don't change it in the fly. Learn your camera, understand the needs of the photo you envision making, and choose the right setting before bringing the EVF up to your eye.
 
But this thread has helped me zero in on exactly what's giving me trouble. Program will attempt to maintain exposure by slowing shutter speed and widening the aperture until you reach maximum aperture of your lens. Once there, Auto ISO only gives you enough ISO to make 1/selectedmin @ Max aperture, regardless if that selected Auto ISO is lower than the set maximum.
Why would the camera needlessly alter ISO? Camera exposure modes offer different ways to choose exposure settings. Shutter speed and f-stop control exposure. ISO isn't an exposure setting.
I want to be able to ask for more shutter speed and for Auto ISO to raise the ISO higher, still respecting my set limits.
You should try shutter priority. Doing so will give you the control you want over shutter speed. Manually dial in an ISO to get the corresponding exposure you'd like to target. Then, set ISO to auto and use EC to get the image lightness you desire in the EVF.

As you increase shutter speed, the camera will adjust f-stop (to maintain your chosen target exposure) until the lens is wide open. At that point, the camera will increase ISO in response to a faster shutter speed to maintain image lightness while exposure continues to decrease.
It just seems strange to me to have this artificial constraint. Program is a very useful mode and could be much more widely adopted if this behavior was fixed.
Nothing needs to be fixed. You're struggling a bit with reconciling the fact that exposure modes don't control ISO and that no automated exposure mode in any model camera always make the choices you'd make. If the camera isn't making settings choices you like, you've got three options: change EC, change metering, or take control of the setting.
Edit: Amended version of my initial take describing the issue:

Let's say the camera says 1/60 F5.6, ISO 400. Turn the main dial and you can shift to 1/120 F4 ISO 400, then 1/240 F4 ISO 800, all the way until you hit your auto ISO limit. The Nikons will not raise the ISO in response to your Program shift, so you'll be stuck at 1/120 F4 ISO 400, with no faster shutter available.
ISO isn't an exposure setting. The P, S, A and M modes don't control ISO in any camera. Full auto does because, well, it automates everything.

Try shutter priority. It gives you the control you want over shutter speed and the flexibility to use EC and auto ISO to maintain a desired image lightness while delegating 2 of the 3 main image making settings.
 
...

Thanks to some other posts that suggested Manual with Auto ISO. It's not great, and it's definitely a slower way of shooting, but it gets closer. It will allow you to set a higher shutter and therefore set a higher ISO for correct exposure. Also it proves that the logic to do this already exists in the camera, and that the current frustration is software, as it always is.
I came from films after a 20-year lapse of no photos, landed on a Z30, now I own a ZF as well.

I hope my reasoning as a simple Amateur, will give you some food for thought even they are not as simple as "DO THIS" settings.

One of the big issues I had in film was related to ISO.
So digital Auto-ISO allowed me to forget any ISO issue 😇

First thing: AutoISO + M mode. M > as I hate complications and I'm in full control.
Z30 Normal 100-9800 AutoISO range
ZF Normal 100-20000 AutoISO range

With the Front wheel Inverted: I usually set the F f6-f14
With the Back wheel Inverted: I set SS from 1/10 to 1/4000
Both controls are easier to remember > more light toward the lens 🙄

It mostly depends on the light I shoot in.
But being that both cameras are fine at 100ISO & 400ISO, I keep an eye on that. If possible, I rely on any combination of speed/aperture that keeps me in one of these values.

Very often, I don't care too much if ISO goes up to 4000 in daylight, provided I have the expected DOF and Speed. [I do PP in DXO, and it will do a miracle on noises anyway]

I tried P once and ran away from it ... fast ... Not my turf.

( There are different ways, but test & test & test until you're comfortable and get an alternative )
 
Last edited:
Another thing to add here, the reason this bothers me so much is that I suspect it prevents a lot of users from easily exploiting one of the main benefits of modern full frame sensors and image processors, their incredible ISO sensitivity and performance. Every day of the week and twice on Sunday's I would trade off a higher ISO for a faster shutter speed. It's why I went full frame.
That's why I do bird & wildlife photography in full manual mode with my Z9. It allows me to take full advantage of everything that camera offers
Thanks to some other posts that suggested Manual with Auto ISO. It's not great, and it's definitely a slower way of shooting,
No, it's not slower.

None of the exposure modes is inherently slower than the others. The key is finding the mode that pairs well with how you like to build a photo. Once you do that, photography becomes instinctive & fast...whatever mode you choose.

Its pretty obvious that programed auto (P) isn't compatible with how you like to build a photo. Try shutter priority or one of the other modes that gives you the control over shutter speed you so clearly want.

Good luck.
 
Thanks for the thoughtful replies. I appreciate it. More inline.
But this thread has helped me zero in on exactly what's giving me trouble. Program will attempt to maintain exposure by slowing shutter speed and widening the aperture until you reach maximum aperture of your lens. Once there, Auto ISO only gives you enough ISO to make 1/selectedmin @ Max aperture, regardless if that selected Auto ISO is lower than the set maximum.
Why would the camera needlessly alter ISO? Camera exposure modes offer different ways to choose exposure settings. Shutter speed and f-stop control exposure. ISO isn't an exposure setting.
It's not needless, it's in response to the users' request to shift the selected program further.
I want to be able to ask for more shutter speed and for Auto ISO to raise the ISO higher, still respecting my set limits.
You should try shutter priority. Doing so will give you the control you want over shutter speed. Manually dial in an ISO to get the corresponding exposure you'd like to target. Then, set ISO to auto and use EC to get the image lightness you desire in the EVF.

As you increase shutter speed, the camera will adjust f-stop (to maintain your chosen target exposure) until the lens is wide open. At that point, the camera will increase ISO in response to a faster shutter speed to maintain image lightness while exposure continues to decrease.
Yes, that's understood, but isn't always what I want. Ultimately I am thinking about both my required shutter and field depth, so with Shutter priority and Auto ISO you inevitably end up at maximum aperture only with the minimum ISO required to make an exposure meet your requested EC.
It just seems strange to me to have this artificial constraint. Program is a very useful mode and could be much more widely adopted if this behavior was fixed.
Nothing needs to be fixed. You're struggling a bit with reconciling the fact that exposure modes don't control ISO and that no automated exposure mode in any model camera always make the choices you'd make. If the camera isn't making settings choices you like, you've got three options: change EC, change metering, or take control of the setting.
My bone is that Auto ISO appears to interact with Program in one direction only, not bi-directionally. It isn't smart or flexible enough to interact with Program to support greater latitude in the shifts available, once light falls below the given threshold A-ISO will cause Program to allow the greatest light-gathering pair only. So from that perspective I understand why it works the way it does.

Any program mode generally will suggest a shutter/aperture reciprocal pair that will provide metered exposure (±EC) at a given sensitivity, and usually allow you to shift along all the reciprocal pairs available that provide that exposure. If I want to change the brightness I will adjust the EC. I want to select from more options that provide a given brightness, and I want A-ISO to enable that. i.e. making a conscious decision that although available light is lower, I want or need greater depth of field. So keep the shutter at the set minimum, close the aperture one increment, and increase the iso one increment, and so on. In this line of thought it's still a reciprocal pair, just shutter/ISO instead of shutter/aperture.
Edit: Amended version of my initial take describing the issue:

Let's say the camera says 1/60 F5.6, ISO 400. Turn the main dial and you can shift to 1/120 F4 ISO 400, then 1/240 F4 ISO 800, all the way until you hit your auto ISO limit. The Nikons will not raise the ISO in response to your Program shift, so you'll be stuck at 1/120 F4 ISO 400, with no faster shutter available.
ISO isn't an exposure setting. The P, S, A and M modes don't control ISO in any camera. Full auto does because, well, it automates everything.

Try shutter priority. It gives you the control you want over shutter speed and the flexibility to use EC and auto ISO to maintain a desired image lightness while delegating 2 of the 3 main image making settings.
I understand that exposure modes don't control ISO and that ISO isn't exposure per se, but it affects the amount of light you are required to capture to meet an exposure. Given ISO is totally flexible now compared to film, I think it's reasonable to consider these 3 factors. I also suspect people who came of age shooting film think about this totally differently than people who cut their teeth on digital. Now even with ISO invariance one could argue that my way of thinking makes more sense.

My reason for saying that it's slower to do this via M+A-ISO, is that well, it just is. I become responsible for shifting 2 dials, and the 2nd dial (sub) on the Z6iii is not prominent and a little tricky to turn quickly.

Think, I'm walking around an indoor event in the evening. I'm taking some close-up portraits, for which the subject is somewhat but not entirely still. So in A mode we're already at minimum shutter speed and A-ISO is only going to give you enough sensitivity for that minimum. Fine. So, S mode then, and we pick a shutter that's a little bit faster so we get a nice sharp picture, and A-ISO moves up to support that. But, we're locked now at maximum aperture. Now we want to take a group photo. The way I remember on Canon, in P, I can then just zip the main dial and ask for a smaller aperture, riding the minimum shutter speed I have set, and increasing the ISO to support that exposure.

It is slower to now be forced to change the main mode selector constantly between modes. But the more I talk about this, I realize I am pretty much describing Canon's flexible priority mode. I don't think this existed as a standalone mode on 5DIV, but P+A-ISO I think pretty much functioned the same way. As far as I can tell an equivalent does not exist on Nikon.

I am trying to get more comfortable with the camera, it always takes time, and I will continue to think if this is a dealbreaker for me or not. Thank you everyone for your time and input.
 
Last edited:
...

Think, I'm walking around an indoor event in the evening. I'm taking some close-up portraits, for which the subject is somewhat but not entirely still

.....

I am trying to get more comfortable with the camera, it always takes time, and I will continue to think if this is a dealbreaker for me or not. Thank you everyone for your time and input.
That's a nice case!

I often find myself in those situations. That's my way of managing them, "keep life easy", and my 2c for what it's worth.

I just determine the minimum shutter speed and set&forget that value, because I'm pretty sure in these situations I cannot obtain so much more light worth caring about it. I keep AutoISO in an adequate range. For instance, 100-12000 is the night setting for Z30.

When shooting, I primarily care about DOF, adjusting f/xx slightly as needed to achieve an intended result, and the camera software will manage to obtain the best light possible.

ISO will change for each shot situation, but I will not change >SS< unless I get unacceptable values.

Yes, comfortable is the right word. While changing, usually it's a very uncomfortable period of learning the NEW and discarding the OLD, not only in Photos 🙄

With current techs, you have to rely more on the capabilities of your new HDW and less on your way of managing it to obtain results. 🤷

(Letting camera software register the best raw it may be done with those settings )

P.S.: What's an error, while you're dealing with a different mode that may give you better results? Thinking about the opportunity of going back to the old way!

--
___.............................!............................ ___
-------- Mid of French/Italian Alps --------- I Love my Carnivores. >https://eu.zonerama.com/AlainCH2/1191151
.
Photography ... It is about how that thing looks when photographed..
( Avoid boring shots )
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the thoughtful replies. I appreciate it. More inline.
But this thread has helped me zero in on exactly what's giving me trouble. Program will attempt to maintain exposure by slowing shutter speed and widening the aperture until you reach maximum aperture of your lens. Once there, Auto ISO only gives you enough ISO to make 1/selectedmin @ Max aperture, regardless if that selected Auto ISO is lower than the set maximum.
Why would the camera needlessly alter ISO? Camera exposure modes offer different ways to choose exposure settings. Shutter speed and f-stop control exposure. ISO isn't an exposure setting.
It's not needless, it's in response to the users' request to shift the selected program further.
The issue isn't that programmed auto doesn't perform as it should. The issue is you've chosen an exposure mode that isn't a match for your needs. You want control over both exposure settings. Why not take it?
I want to be able to ask for more shutter speed and for Auto ISO to raise the ISO higher, still respecting my set limits.
You should try shutter priority. Doing so will give you the control you want over shutter speed. Manually dial in an ISO to get the corresponding exposure you'd like to target. Then, set ISO to auto and use EC to get the image lightness you desire in the EVF.

As you increase shutter speed, the camera will adjust f-stop (to maintain your chosen target exposure) until the lens is wide open. At that point, the camera will increase ISO in response to a faster shutter speed to maintain image lightness while exposure continues to decrease.
Yes, that's understood, but isn't always what I want. Ultimately I am thinking about both my required shutter and field depth,
If you want control of both, you need to be in manual exposure mode. In manual, you choose the depth of field and how movement is rendered.
so with Shutter priority and Auto ISO you inevitably end up at maximum aperture only with the minimum ISO required to make an exposure meet your requested EC.
Hmm, not so much.

Suppose you set ISO 800 as the target in auto ISO mode on your Z6III so, the camera is working in its invariant range. You've set a shutter speed of 1/2000 to freeze wing movement on a bird in flight.

The camera will pretty quickly choose the widest aperture the lens offers. It's done this at your request: maximize exposure at the target ISO. If clouds roll in or the Sun gets low and the scene darkens, the camera will increase ISO to maintain image lightness. It can't open the lens aperture any wider to maintain exposure at the shutter speed you've selected. It can only maintain image lightness through an increased ISO.

Suppose a deer walks into view and begins casually grazing. You don't need a 1/2000-second shutter speed to freeze that movement so, you dial-in 1/500. The camera responds to the 2-stop increase in exposure by reducing ISO to your target of 800 and, if needed, closing the lens.

If you want the lens to be wide open for a shallow depth of field, press the ISO button and lower the target ISO until the lens is back to wide open. Moving forward, the camera is now targeting a greater exposure. It will still increase ISO if the scene lighting darkens enough.

Replace the bird & deer with pedestrians on a street or any other subject. This is how Nikon cameras work. When you set a target ISO, you tell the camera, "Target the exposure that pairs with this ISO." The camera will do that. It will deliver the exposure you've targeted until it's no longer able to do so. At that point, it'll deliver the target image lightness you've selected.

In any auto exposure mode, the camera will choose settings that deliver the user-targeted exposure. If auto ISO is also engaged, the camera will increase ISO in response to a user-targeted exposure that results in an image lightness below an on-meter reading of 0.

If these results aren't meeting your needs, take more control. Take as much control as is needed to get what you want.
It just seems strange to me to have this artificial constraint. Program is a very useful mode and could be much more widely adopted if this behavior was fixed.
Nothing needs to be fixed. You're struggling a bit with reconciling the fact that exposure modes don't control ISO and that no automated exposure mode in any model camera always make the choices you'd make. If the camera isn't making settings choices you like, you've got three options: change EC, change metering, or take control of the setting.
My bone is that Auto ISO appears to interact with Program in one direction only, not bi-directionally.
Its performance is driven by your selected target exposure. That's not going to change.
It isn't smart or flexible enough to interact with Program to support greater latitude in the shifts available, once light falls below the given threshold A-ISO will cause Program to allow the greatest light-gathering pair only. So from that perspective I understand why it works the way it does.
Any auto exposure mode will respect the exposure you target.
Any program mode generally will suggest a shutter/aperture reciprocal pair that will provide metered exposure (±EC) at a given sensitivity, and usually allow you to shift along all the reciprocal pairs available that provide that exposure. If I want to change the brightness I will adjust the EC. I want to select from more options that provide a given brightness, and I want A-ISO to enable that. i.e. making a conscious decision that although available light is lower, I want or need greater depth of field. So keep the shutter at the set minimum, close the aperture one increment, and increase the iso one increment, and so on. In this line of thought it's still a reciprocal pair, just shutter/ISO instead of shutter/aperture.
You may be able to make P mode be the square peg that fits in the round hole. You may be less frustrated by taking more direct control of the exposure settings.
Edit: Amended version of my initial take describing the issue:

Let's say the camera says 1/60 F5.6, ISO 400. Turn the main dial and you can shift to 1/120 F4 ISO 400, then 1/240 F4 ISO 800, all the way until you hit your auto ISO limit. The Nikons will not raise the ISO in response to your Program shift, so you'll be stuck at 1/120 F4 ISO 400, with no faster shutter available.
ISO isn't an exposure setting. The P, S, A and M modes don't control ISO in any camera. Full auto does because, well, it automates everything.

Try shutter priority. It gives you the control you want over shutter speed and the flexibility to use EC and auto ISO to maintain a desired image lightness while delegating 2 of the 3 main image making settings.
I understand that exposure modes don't control ISO and that ISO isn't exposure per se, but it affects the amount of light you are required to capture to meet an exposure. Given ISO is totally flexible now compared to film, I think it's reasonable to consider these 3 factors. I also suspect people who came of age shooting film think about this totally differently than people who cut their teeth on digital. Now even with ISO invariance one could argue that my way of thinking makes more sense.
What I'm seeing is a photographer who wants an auto mode to behave contrary to it's rational programming. I recommend you stop fighting the camera and acknowledge that you want more control. Take more control.
My reason for saying that it's slower to do this via M+A-ISO, is that well, it just is. I become responsible for shifting 2 dials, and the 2nd dial (sub) on the Z6iii is not prominent and a little tricky to turn quickly.
That's not the issue. The question is, do you have enough time to control both exposure settings? The answer is, yes.
Think, I'm walking around an indoor event in the evening. I'm taking some close-up portraits, for which the subject is somewhat but not entirely still. So in A mode we're already at minimum shutter speed and A-ISO is only going to give you enough sensitivity for that minimum. Fine.
The camera will increase ISO in response to too little light. It'll increase shutter speed in response to too much light. Where'sc the problem?
So, S mode then, and we pick a shutter that's a little bit faster so we get a nice sharp picture, and A-ISO moves up to support that. But, we're locked now at maximum aperture. Now we want to take a group photo.
If aperture becomes the priority over shutter speed, switch to aperture priority. Or, you can simplify things and shoot in manual. Whether movement or depth of field is the priority, you're in a mode that allows the control you want.
The way I remember on Canon, in P, I can then just zip the main dial and ask for a smaller aperture, riding the minimum shutter speed I have set, and increasing the ISO to support that exposure.
If you're in P mode instead of S or A, rotate the command dial until you get to the aperture you want. If the shutter speed is too slow, press the ISO button and increase the target ISO...reduce the target exposure.

The camera isn't going to reduce exposure - lower image quality - unless you tell it to do so.

Or simplify things and shoot in manual.
It is slower to now be forced to change the main mode selector constantly between modes. But the more I talk about this, I realize I am pretty much describing Canon's flexible priority mode. I don't think this existed as a standalone mode on 5DIV, but P+A-ISO I think pretty much functioned the same way. As far as I can tell an equivalent does not exist on Nikon.
You're no longer shooting Canon. You've upgraded to Nikon. Trying to force the Nikon peg into the Canon hole only leads to frustration. Embrace the system you have. Take advantage of all it offers.
I am trying to get more comfortable with the camera, it always takes time, and I will continue to think if this is a dealbreaker for me or not. Thank you everyone for your time and input.
--
Bill Ferris Photography
Flagstaff, AZ
 
Last edited:
Again - because I honestly just have to say it, thank you everyone who chimed in. Refreshing to post something detailed and get equally detailed responses. 5 stars.

I took an opportunity to cross-check with a R5 II and came away with a bit more information. Seems it probably wasn't just a difference in the way A-ISO functions on Canon, but actually a second feature altogether, something called "Safety Shift" that was providing the capability to Program Shift into "less light" pairs, while then adjusting iso to compensate. Understand that no equivalent exists on Nikon.

But, as suggested I have been shooting more in Manual with A-ISO. I find the non-clicky ring on the S lenses to not be super great for aperture, but to try and make it better I did see that there is a sensitivity control for said ring. So I will try that for a bit.

Shutter on the main control dial, aperture on the ring in M, otherwise ISO on the ring, both in low sensitivity. My next challenge is to discover how to have the control ring do one thing in one mode and another function in another mode.

The joys of learning. Cheers everyone.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top