I don't think the lenses will be redundant, there will be a lot of people who will want to own both.
As to what the better setup is, that obviously depends on your shooting style. A wide-angle landscape shooters won't want to be without either in their bags. Both setups you mention here are lacking a "normal" 30-ish focal length which is important to me, and the 40 is too tight for most situations as a "normal" and not long enough to really do what telephotos are good at (isolating elements, collapsing perceived distances between objects, lots of bokeh, portraiture with minimal distortion of facial features, greater working distance from skitish/dangerous subjects, etc.). The Pentax 50s are better at all these things, but are still a very usable focal length. The 77 is just special.
So I would likely go something like 15, 21, 31, 77/70 depending on what the 15 turns out to be. But if you are someone who likes to photograph with a slightly long "normal," then your preference would dictate the 43, 40, or possibly the 35 instead of the 31 as your "normal." I also wouldn't rule out replacing the 15 and 21 with a 16-50 if they ever get their quality control together.
-Matt
Does anyone think that having the DA15 (when it comes out) and the
DA21 would be redundant? If yes, what do you think is the better
setup?
DA 15/40/70
or
DA 21/40/70
TIA!
--
... interested in .... photographs? Heh? Know what a mean? Photographs? (He asked him knowingly). Nudge nudge, snap snap, grin grin, wink wink, say no more, say no more, know what a' mean? Know what a' mean?
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/home#section=ARTIST&subSection=183820&subSubSection=0&language=EN