What is the point of the X-H2, why not just put the features in an XPr0-3 or XT-5?

[ninjagowoo]

I don't see the reasoning behind the new X-H2. I have a XPro2 and XT2 (which I really like), what would be the downside behind putting IBIS and such in the existing XPro and XT lines?

II believe the build quality of those two lines is excellent (for Fuji's advanced amateur audience) and the dials are a real distinctive positive feature. So what's the benefit?

In general this question can be applied to many of Fuji's cameras since they like to repackage similar internals into different form factors with a few differentiating features. Eg: "Why have an x-pro2? it's Just an x-e3 with a fancy viewfinder. Why not just put the OVF in the x-e3?". I'm stretching a bit but you get the picture.

As others have mentioned, we won't really know until the specs are announced.

 

[Batdude]

Add a grip to the XT4 and what is the REAL difference between that and the X-H? Build quality? The XT4 is a very well built camera.

The cameras are soooooo close I don't really see the point of the two lines, but then again, I hate Kool Aid (Flavor Aid actually).

I still prefer the grip on the X-H1.

The X-Tx cameras indeed have great build quality, but the X-H line is even better in that regard.

Also, the X-Tx cameras have an exposure compensation dial while the X-H line has a top display instead.

The shutter button is also different.

Yeah baby I think that shutter button was my favorite part of the camera hahaha

I'm sure there will be more things on the X-H2 that will differentiate it from the X-Tx line, though.

 

[JT26]

That’s fair enough and you’re right I guess it’s not a pro model but certainly it is their attempt while keeping things relatively affordable. It’s a camera that’s near four years old now and the camera world has moved forward a fair bit…

I feel they have the tech now to release a real winner with top focussing, huge battery, great ergonomics and ideally their recent love for video pushes then to 8k sensors, ensuring some high res images too. Not that I care for 8k at all

 

[Canadianguy]

I don't see the reasoning behind the new X-H2. I have a XPro2 and XT2 (which I really like), what would be the downside behind putting IBIS and such in the existing XPro and XT lines?

II believe the build quality of those two lines is excellent (for Fuji's advanced amateur audience) and the dials are a real distinctive positive feature. So what's the benefit?

When the X-line started - it was basically rangefinder style with OVF (X-Pro1) or rangefinder style with EVF (X-E1) at a cheaper price - simple choice for an inter-changable lens camera

A decade later and we have this mess - I counted 8 different model lines - if someone knows of something I am missing - fall free to jump in. What are the 8 different styles of photography that would warranty so many different models? Has Fujifilm marketing ever told us what they are?

X-H#

X-T#

X-T##

X-T###

X-Pro#

X-S##

X-E#

X-A#

The majority of these lines reuse the same processor and image sensor...we shouldn't be trying to provide answers of why one model is better for this use vs another use. Fujifilm marketing needs to provide that. They never provided a satisfactory answer of where an X-H1 should be used over the models using the same sensor / processor combo. I got one because it was an amazing deal that I couldn't turn down.

But I doubt the X-H2 is going to be discounted 65% within the first year of launch this time. So Fujifilm marketing better provide a good use case for such a model over their other models.

Something I have thrown out there before - the stacked sensor maybe exclusive to the X-H2 line, this would justify its higher price compared to all the other lines. Look at the GFX line up - for their latest release they have switched to the same body, different sensors model vs. the same sensor, different bodies model of the past.

 

[bs1946]

I recently watched a YouTube video on the X-H1, mostly just out of boredom and curiosity, because I don't have an X-H1 and have no interest in getting one. I don't remember the author but he was filming it on his X-H1 and of course, was explaining all of the reasons why the X-H1 is the greatest thing since sliced bread. Then he went on to talking about the things he wished his X-H1 didn't have but was hoping would arrive in an X-H2. But then made the point that everything he wanted in an X-H2 is already available in the newer generations of the XT-3 and X-T4, so there really is no reason for an X-H2.

We are already at a point of diminishing returns and at some point, there will be nothing left to add to any of them. Personally, I shoot stills with my X-T1, X-E1, and X100S and possibly replacing the X100S or X-E1 with an X-T2 is the only upgrade I'm considering.

 

[Threaded]

The XH line has been something of a conundrum since it was introduced and Fuji never solved it while the XH1 was around, whether they will with the XH2 remains to be seen.

If you’re asking me what the point of the line is, I’d have to tell you I don’t know. The big standout feature of the XH1 was IBIS, and (a) that wasn’t enough to sell it at the price they wanted, and (b) that feature is now available in the XT4, the XS10, and generally expected in other models soon.

The other big thing about the XH1 was its tough build, and that’s all well and good, but as you say Fuji’s other flagship bodies aren’t exactly fragile. For their price and size they’re built plenty well enough. Again, the differences weren’t enough to sell the XH1 at its launch price; it only sold later on when the price was slashed, undercutting Fuji’s ambition for it to be the premium pro choice.

For the XH2 Fuji do have the opportunity to correct one of the XH1’s big mistakes, and to fit it with their newest and best sensor and processor tech, and (if priced sensibly) that will make it more compelling. But, we all know Fuji’s habit of reusing the same technology across their whole range, and we all know it will only be a matter of perhaps months before that same technology is available in a cheaper XT5, or perhaps an even cheaper XT40 etc. For me the XH still seems unnecessary.

 

[forest dream]

For the XH2 Fuji do have the opportunity to correct one of the XH1’s big mistakes, and to fit it with their newest and best sensor and processor tech, and (if priced sensibly) that will make it more compelling. But, we all know Fuji’s habit of reusing the same technology across their whole range,

Fujifilm should provide reasonable extra features via larger body. If all X-H2 features able port to smaller Fuji flagship camera, why need X-H2?

IMO below features able provide via large body :

• Curvy dual grip body design with dual NP-W235 battery which support hot-swapping.
• Larger EVF with eye-control AF or Q-menu. Q-menu around EVF panel, once eye-spot on it, rotate dial will direct adjust current parameter.
• Built-in GPS and rate dial which support AI powered photo organization.
• Triple X-Processor 5: one for image/video processing, one for AF, one of camera operation (e.g. UI, network). X-Hx series can support multiple processor due to dual battery.
• Built-in LUTs + film simulation for support in-camera video processing (instant preview when shooting)

https://m.dpreview.com/news/6694369...nology-promising-nearly-5x-faster-performance

• Provide better in-camera noise reduction via fast processor.
• Built-in fan (customizable auto turn on if shoot 4K/8K, turn off when shooting photo).
• Built-in M.2 SSD card slot with heat sink.
• Built-in electronic variable graduated ND filter (B&W LCD panel with polarizing filter, has Fujifilm coating) which allow turn off/customize different graduated pattern.