May be I did not make my point clear in the original posting
[-snip-]
Benjamin, I don't participate in flames, here at DPR or anywhere. So don't mistake my response for one of "flaming" you. The comment about having too much equipment was tongue in cheek. Most photographers are equipment-philes. I certainly am. Clearly you are, too, whether you admit it or not ;-). (And, for the record, I would be jealous of your equipment only if you were shooting Arca-Swiss or Ebony 4x5).
I thought you were asking about the prudence of your Leica purchase versus buying an EOS-1DS. I was saying they are quite different, so the comparison is not an easy one to make. It depends a lot on your shooting style, whether you like an SLR or rangefinder, whether you need to do stealthy street shooting, etc. It is a good bet that the Leica will retain much of its value over the long term, while the 1DS will not.
But if your point was that you want to step away from the digital roller coaster for a while, then that may be a reasonable thing to do, too. Again, though, it is a very personal and subjective choice. The 1DS seems awfully nice.
I guess, if I
were to make an appeal to your senses about buying too much equipment, it would be more like this... while there is a certain amount of pleasure we get from buying things, from owning them, and from using them, in photography, the greater pleasure almost always comes from the results -- seeing beautiful slides on your lightbox or beautiful shots on your computer screen. Saying "I did that!" You can do that now with your existing equipment. Do you need the Leica? Do you need the 1DS? Are you buying redundant equipment? If so, it's a good time to look at whether the money is really being well spent. IMO, the wisest choice for maximizing the enjoyment of your photography with eight grand would be to take yourself and your existing camera equipment on a nice, long trip. Then take your savings and buy a new 1DS a year or two after its release ;-).
--
Brian Kennedy
http://www.briankennedy.net/