Art_P
Forum Pro
Releasing a mechanical latch and substituting a electromagnetic one would reduce time to trip the shutter, and would render the mechanism more sensitive to shock, while adding battery drain.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
daddyo wrote:
Per the Olympus Asia website:
"Equipped with Short Release Time Lag Mode, which reduces the release time lag. It is very effective when shooting rapidly moving objects.
I guess this would be effective in shooting racing events or airshows, etc.
- * The minimum time lag when the release mode is "Short" and the image stabilizer is turned off during half-pressing is approximately 0.044 sec.
- * The number of maximum shots is reduced by about 60 (based on CIPA standards)."
It doesn't say what the 'Normal' shutter lag time is -- seems like I saw .29 sec somewhere.
God Bless,
Greg
www.imagismphotos.com
www.mccroskery.zenfolio.com
www.pbase.com/daddyo
You could just quote this post. It tells the same thing. And it also tells what "normal" shutter lag should be (it's not 0.29 second).daddyo wrote:
Per the Olympus Asia website:
"Equipped with Short Release Time Lag Mode, which reduces the release time lag. It is very effective when shooting rapidly moving objects.
I guess this would be effective in shooting racing events or airshows, etc.
- * The minimum time lag when the release mode is "Short" and the image stabilizer is turned off during half-pressing is approximately 0.044 sec.
- * The number of maximum shots is reduced by about 60 (based on CIPA standards)."
It doesn't say what the 'Normal' shutter lag time is -- seems like I saw .29 sec somewhere.
Hmmm, I do have a pocket camera that does up to 1,000 fps at very low resolution. If I can borrow an E-M1 sometime here in Oz I'll have a try at seeing what happens.Brian Wadie wrote:
yes, shutter fired with lens off, as you say, it may be so fast / subtle that a video would be needed
I'll leave that for someone else![]()
There is an option to set it like that.So is IBIS still enabled for the photo, just not in the viewfinder?
Interesting. Further confirms it's the part that 'cocks' the shutter. It's like cocking a gun, to set it to 'short.'just done it, nothing visible happens but the "Clunk" after switch on is still evident in the "Short"setting (but not with "Normal")
The only other MFT camera that has it is the E-P5.Is the em1 the only oly to have this feature? If others have it, which ones? Thanks.
And the E-PL6, variously sold in Japan, Singapore, and parts of Europe it seems.The only other MFT camera that has it is the E-P5.Is the em1 the only oly to have this feature? If others have it, which ones? Thanks.
Right. Sorry about the ethnocentric bias. ;-)And the E-PL6, variously sold in Japan, Singapore, and parts of Europe it seems.The only other MFT camera that has it is the E-P5.Is the em1 the only oly to have this feature? If others have it, which ones? Thanks.
Regards... Guy
Hmmm. What about the "Such impacts may cause the monitor to stop displaying subjects"I have a theory about this:
If "release lag" is set to "short", the camera might generate the EVF preview at working aperture, and it might focus at working aperture and it might use an electronic first curtain, like Sony's NEX cameras do it.
Most MFT lenses are not originally built for this mode of operation, and so problems might occur with some lenses.
This would explain the increased power consumption as well as increased sensitivity against sharp impacts, because the aperture mechanism consumes power and because the aperture blades are not securely locked in this state.