Yes it is horrible, One hand on camera, one to touchLol, horrible to use? Really. You must hate phones.it's horrible to use and that's why apple hasnt implemented it eitherYoure overvthinking it. Instead of pressing a button you touch the screen and it takes a photo. Its really that simple. On tripod, off tripod whatever it doesnt matter. When i use the griii in low light i always use tap to shoot as pressing the shutter can cause more movement in the camera. There is no blur caused by tap to shoot.Perhaps a bit OT but I'm trying to figure out how I'd manage to shoot stills with a tap on the LCD, possibly fold out - and to get this way a sharp image w/o the need to stay in the very short exposure times range.Tap to shoot on the GRIII is awesome.. sux that this hasnt got that. i just assumed it would..another reason not to upgrade the a7r2.
Steadly holding the cam may be already quite challenging in the traditional position with the cam held firmely to the eye and with the shutter release button with vertical action and close to the face as the point of support/stabilization. Imagining how this could reasonably work ergonomically with the LCD screen flipped to the side or downwards, applying a tap on it. I'm not using my smartphone often for taking a photograph but I know how many of those few photos needed several attempts because of the ruined ones due to the blur caused by my tap on the screen. But that's just me with possibly my ergonomic limitations![]()
I just typed this on my phone..and taped the screen loads of times....
Easy on android, point and shoot..
shaky shots
slow to focus
I have a canon that does this, and it’s to appeal to the smart phone crowd, and when you have the finest phone maker on the market, doesn’t include this option, it was probably not a good idea to start with.
Last edited: