bugzie
Senior Member
Someone influential writes an internet article on tripods, and it becomes the orthodoxy from then on. I read Thom's article, and I also read another that said any old tripod is better than none at all.
I have a dirt cheap Velbon I got originally for a compact digicam, and when I got my dSLR it was almost useless as it was that flimsy. It's not entirely useless these days because I can use it to support a flash gun for off-camera flash but it's hopeless for my dSLR.
So I needed a new one. Went and checked out the tripods at the stores and ended up with a carbon fibre Slik. Some of the tripods I had chosen from specs of the internet were dramatic overkill in that they were huge and heavy. The Slik I got was, for me, the best compromise in price, weight and ergonomics.
You really need to take the camera and lens to the store and spend some time exploring all your options. You can see now what happens when you ask opinions from the internet. ;-) You can just get the same old advice rehashed over and over.
I have a dirt cheap Velbon I got originally for a compact digicam, and when I got my dSLR it was almost useless as it was that flimsy. It's not entirely useless these days because I can use it to support a flash gun for off-camera flash but it's hopeless for my dSLR.
So I needed a new one. Went and checked out the tripods at the stores and ended up with a carbon fibre Slik. Some of the tripods I had chosen from specs of the internet were dramatic overkill in that they were huge and heavy. The Slik I got was, for me, the best compromise in price, weight and ergonomics.
You really need to take the camera and lens to the store and spend some time exploring all your options. You can see now what happens when you ask opinions from the internet. ;-) You can just get the same old advice rehashed over and over.