I am actually digging into it because I think this editor is a gem.
For raw development it is not the king, but for color and tone adjustment, in my opinion it is unmatched.
I am comfortable with other editors but I am really happy to discover new ways of seing image adjustments.
There are a lot of strange things in this editor:
- its interface is a kind of messy, but you can perform adjustments very efficiently
- it seems you have too much parameters, but you quickly realise that some of them are the ones you have been looking for for a long time: the "light blender" is doing things I am not able to replicate easily in other editors... the vignette function is the most complete I have ever seen... you can perform curve adjustment that even curvemeister does not propose... the info palette shows you lab values (very useful for skintone colors)... and the list goes on!
- having read the only blog that stays available (https://sagelighteditor.wordpress.com), I have no doubt that Rob Nelson knows perfectly what he is talking about. Nevertheless, some of his positions are strange, like the one to push jpeg (how can it be the default format proposed by Sagelight when you save?), the one on destructive/non destructive editing (I am not saying it is easy to develop a Sagelight that would be fully non-destructive, but it would have been so great to have this kind of editor), and the one of ICC profile (you perform such great color transformation in Sagelight but you save a file without specifying the ICC that corresponds to the colors you have defined -- how can it be?)
This editor is full of contradictions and challenges but it is rewarding.
Most of other editors copy each other. Sagelight is kind of fresh and puzzling.
Even dead, I love it!
For raw development it is not the king, but for color and tone adjustment, in my opinion it is unmatched.
I am comfortable with other editors but I am really happy to discover new ways of seing image adjustments.
There are a lot of strange things in this editor:
- its interface is a kind of messy, but you can perform adjustments very efficiently
- it seems you have too much parameters, but you quickly realise that some of them are the ones you have been looking for for a long time: the "light blender" is doing things I am not able to replicate easily in other editors... the vignette function is the most complete I have ever seen... you can perform curve adjustment that even curvemeister does not propose... the info palette shows you lab values (very useful for skintone colors)... and the list goes on!
- having read the only blog that stays available (https://sagelighteditor.wordpress.com), I have no doubt that Rob Nelson knows perfectly what he is talking about. Nevertheless, some of his positions are strange, like the one to push jpeg (how can it be the default format proposed by Sagelight when you save?), the one on destructive/non destructive editing (I am not saying it is easy to develop a Sagelight that would be fully non-destructive, but it would have been so great to have this kind of editor), and the one of ICC profile (you perform such great color transformation in Sagelight but you save a file without specifying the ICC that corresponds to the colors you have defined -- how can it be?)
This editor is full of contradictions and challenges but it is rewarding.
Most of other editors copy each other. Sagelight is kind of fresh and puzzling.
Even dead, I love it!