Jeroen1969
Well-known member
- Messages
- 217
- Solutions
- 1
- Reaction score
- 409
Now that was a hefty discussion about the Firmware update for the OM-1 "Mark 1". It was filled to the rim, so I could not share my experience with you guys. Heck, why not a sequel?
The Good
Well, my camera still works. Same goes for the 300mm F/4.0 IS Pro that I had updated pretty much right after I installed Firmware Update 1.6 on my OM-1. Yes, it had forgotten all about my native language, the date and the time. I gladly reminded my camera on these subjects.
The Unkown
Wait a minute.... is one not supposed to give "The Bad" right after giving "The Good"? Well, it is a habit, but regarding the firmware update, I really can't say I've noticed something bad. That is to say, the camera is not performing worse after the update than it did before.
Now, the discussion went on because from various different sources, information was received and then spread around that the Firmware Update secretly also improved AF performance. Some were pretty sure that was bullocks, others were pretty sure their camera had improved.
Fact is, after having shot for two days, some couple of hundred clicks, I must say I shot my best shots AFTER I had done the Firmware Update. But. Am I sure that this is because I did the update? Well, no. First, I also updated the firmware of my 300mm F/4.0 IS Pro lens. Second: reading through the replies I picked up an occasional tip. Third: I only own the OM-1 for just over two months now and the MC-14 for just over a week. So I will not rule out the possibility that I'm getting more and more used to the OM-1 and therefore have more shots that please me.
Let me show you what I mean by sharing one of my earlier shots of a Robin:

This was shot using an Olympus FT 70-300mm lens that I sold later on. Perhaps having an older FT on the OM-1 by means of an adapter is not the wisest of decisions one can make.
Now here is a Robin that I captured after the firmware update and using a prime lens:

It can be that "it is between my ears", but I got this feeling that it was easier to get a sharp picture AFTER the firmware update than BEFORE. But hey, I'm comparing apples and pears here (older Non-Pro Olympus lens v.s. Olympus Prime), so let me find another comparison that is more in the direction of apples and apples.

This was taken BEFORE the firmware update. I had to help the AF quite a lot, perhaps all that gras is not really helping. Though I promised a more apple-2-apple comparison, the next shot that was taken AFTER the firmware update was also taken earlier during the day as in: better light.

This one was done by the AF it self. Not "tack sharp", but distance does have an effect. Things like atmospheric distortion do come in to play. The nice thing about the set-up that I have is that it can take sharp pictures (provided properly focused) from a relatively short distance.

Again, I can't provide any proof, but I got this hunch that BEFORE the update I had more troubles grasping images like the one above.
Anyways, to rule out the option that it was the firmware of the lens that improved my experiences, rather than the update of the body, today I went out and brought my Olympus 12-40mm F/2.8 Pro. To be honest: I have no clue if that lens has up-2-date firmware, I will check that right after this post.

I took this one completely relying on the AF as I had the camera well above my head and difficulty judging the image on the screen, having two dogs on a leash that were pulling did not help very much either. Once at home, I was pleasantly surprised by the result.
Now, whilst I was in the "test it out in the field mode", I decided to do a comparison, shooting the same subject with the 40mm, the 300mm without the MC-14 TC and the 300mm with the MC-14 TC on it. Below you'll find a 100% crop screenshot with those 3 aligned.

Conclusion
Firmware update 1.6 by no means harmed my camera. I'm getting better results but I can't rule out that general practice has just as much to do with that than that firmware update.
I also decided that the 1.4 TC can stay on my 300mm lens. I do not really loose much image quality and given the size of my general subjects (birds and insects mostly) I'm getting nicer results with that thing attached than without as there are limits to the amount of cropping one can do with "only" 20MP.
That said, I do look forward to the announced firmware update that will address the AF issues. Because not all of my shots are "keepers". And I would like to see a higher "sharp shot percentage".
The Good
Well, my camera still works. Same goes for the 300mm F/4.0 IS Pro that I had updated pretty much right after I installed Firmware Update 1.6 on my OM-1. Yes, it had forgotten all about my native language, the date and the time. I gladly reminded my camera on these subjects.
The Unkown
Wait a minute.... is one not supposed to give "The Bad" right after giving "The Good"? Well, it is a habit, but regarding the firmware update, I really can't say I've noticed something bad. That is to say, the camera is not performing worse after the update than it did before.
Now, the discussion went on because from various different sources, information was received and then spread around that the Firmware Update secretly also improved AF performance. Some were pretty sure that was bullocks, others were pretty sure their camera had improved.
Fact is, after having shot for two days, some couple of hundred clicks, I must say I shot my best shots AFTER I had done the Firmware Update. But. Am I sure that this is because I did the update? Well, no. First, I also updated the firmware of my 300mm F/4.0 IS Pro lens. Second: reading through the replies I picked up an occasional tip. Third: I only own the OM-1 for just over two months now and the MC-14 for just over a week. So I will not rule out the possibility that I'm getting more and more used to the OM-1 and therefore have more shots that please me.
Let me show you what I mean by sharing one of my earlier shots of a Robin:

This was shot using an Olympus FT 70-300mm lens that I sold later on. Perhaps having an older FT on the OM-1 by means of an adapter is not the wisest of decisions one can make.
Now here is a Robin that I captured after the firmware update and using a prime lens:

It can be that "it is between my ears", but I got this feeling that it was easier to get a sharp picture AFTER the firmware update than BEFORE. But hey, I'm comparing apples and pears here (older Non-Pro Olympus lens v.s. Olympus Prime), so let me find another comparison that is more in the direction of apples and apples.

This was taken BEFORE the firmware update. I had to help the AF quite a lot, perhaps all that gras is not really helping. Though I promised a more apple-2-apple comparison, the next shot that was taken AFTER the firmware update was also taken earlier during the day as in: better light.

This one was done by the AF it self. Not "tack sharp", but distance does have an effect. Things like atmospheric distortion do come in to play. The nice thing about the set-up that I have is that it can take sharp pictures (provided properly focused) from a relatively short distance.

Again, I can't provide any proof, but I got this hunch that BEFORE the update I had more troubles grasping images like the one above.
Anyways, to rule out the option that it was the firmware of the lens that improved my experiences, rather than the update of the body, today I went out and brought my Olympus 12-40mm F/2.8 Pro. To be honest: I have no clue if that lens has up-2-date firmware, I will check that right after this post.

I took this one completely relying on the AF as I had the camera well above my head and difficulty judging the image on the screen, having two dogs on a leash that were pulling did not help very much either. Once at home, I was pleasantly surprised by the result.
Now, whilst I was in the "test it out in the field mode", I decided to do a comparison, shooting the same subject with the 40mm, the 300mm without the MC-14 TC and the 300mm with the MC-14 TC on it. Below you'll find a 100% crop screenshot with those 3 aligned.

Conclusion
Firmware update 1.6 by no means harmed my camera. I'm getting better results but I can't rule out that general practice has just as much to do with that than that firmware update.
I also decided that the 1.4 TC can stay on my 300mm lens. I do not really loose much image quality and given the size of my general subjects (birds and insects mostly) I'm getting nicer results with that thing attached than without as there are limits to the amount of cropping one can do with "only" 20MP.
That said, I do look forward to the announced firmware update that will address the AF issues. Because not all of my shots are "keepers". And I would like to see a higher "sharp shot percentage".



