NX300 (first?) practical test...

[Ariston]

also I don't waste my time on someone who can't even read or refuse to even analyze the whole statement and go beyond "ISO rating is overrated". there is no point discussing this further as it is already posted. it's just you that chose not to read nor understand it and start a senseless sarcasm back and forth that you basically started. I would no longer reply to your post which contains useless bickering or until you show some intelligence, maturity and politeness. until then, you are simply to be ignored as trolls should be treated. good bye.

 

[Usee]

tecnoworld wrote:

Thanks! This is really informative and would deserve a thread by its own, imho!

Let's see,



maybe I'll take the time to prepare a nice comparison between the NX1000, the OM-D and the X-Pro1...

...I'd love to do the comparison with the NX300 - in a few weeks...

...thank You for Your positive feedback!



Ulrich

 

[Usee]

eilivk wrote:

There is a lot to consider about the different systems, makes an old man's head spin, like not-so-honest ISO. Reading posts in different forums, and judging what is facts. Don't know enough about NX yet, but know that NX300 and 30mm would be a fine combination. Or if I could get a 200 or 210 cheap with the 18-55.... Look forward to tests of NX300 and NX20.

Yes,

it isn't that easy and straight forward as one would think at the first glance,

but it is always nice to learn something new and the NX300 is really promising.

-

Even the (probably) improved ergonomic (handgrip, tiltable AMOLED screen and advanced WiFi) and

the pretty nice design are things I want to have...

...but let's just wait a bit and then we know for sure!

-

Ulrich

 

[tecnoworld]

That would be great!