Most are missing why the E-M1 mark II sensor is often better than even APSC or FF

Freeze the moment the ball hits the bat and the bat curves back from the impact. All I can think of.
 
Just so as not to be contradictory, his next purchase will be a FF cell phone camera. But here he is on the M43 forum.

Oh, didn't Panasonic make something like that, think it was $1,000 with some sort of big sensor. Or was it $2,000? Was it M43? Did anybody buy it?

Sorry you are such a bad photographer. He has seen your photos, hasn't he?

The only advantage I can think of for the M43 sensor is smaller/lighter lenses. Full disclosure, except for an OLY Tough, I only shoot M43, ah.....because the lenses are smaller/lighter.

Very unscientific, I know.
 
I prefer the GH1/2 size if you're gonna do m4/3.

Even my BMPCC is an itty bitty camera.

Then you have Sony.....

Itty bitty camera.

BIG lenses.

:-)
 
Fair enough. My biggest body is an EM5. I have a PL/7, PM2, PM1.

Yeah, I dig itty bitty:-D

And yet.... sometimes I wish OLY would make a new camera the size of an E620 or E5 or something like it for the 50-200 + TC I have, or the 40-150 + TC PRO, or the 300 + TC PRO with the 20MP 4/3 sensor (or the newest 16MP sensor for good performance)

But I'd still have an itty bitty sensor in it because I like itty bitty lenses:-D
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top