Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For "why" you would need to ask Nikon.If the Nikon ML-L7 Bluetooth remote control can work with the Z30, Z5, Z50, Z50 II, Z6 II, Z6 III, Z7 II, Zf, and Zfc, why won't they make it work with the Z8 or Z9?
But then you're expected to put a ridiculous, bulky receiver on the body, when it has built-in Bluetooth and WiFi.For "why" you would need to ask Nikon.If the Nikon ML-L7 Bluetooth remote control can work with the Z30, Z5, Z50, Z50 II, Z6 II, Z6 III, Z7 II, Zf, and Zfc, why won't they make it work with the Z8 or Z9?
As for "how", the WR-R11a/WR-T10 set is a remote release with other functionality, such as synchronizing bodies. Snapbridge or NX Tether are also remote release possibilities.
As already said, ‘why’ are always for the manufacturer, rarely anyone else would know reason why this and why that apart from decision makers within each organisation. Even most staff at said organisations don’t know the reasons why.But then you're expected to put a ridiculous, bulky receiver on the body, when it has built-in Bluetooth and WiFi.For "why" you would need to ask Nikon.If the Nikon ML-L7 Bluetooth remote control can work with the Z30, Z5, Z50, Z50 II, Z6 II, Z6 III, Z7 II, Zf, and Zfc, why won't they make it work with the Z8 or Z9?
As for "how", the WR-R11a/WR-T10 set is a remote release with other functionality, such as synchronizing bodies. Snapbridge or NX Tether are also remote release possibilities.
The WR-R11a is not bulky. It is by far the smallest device of its type that I know of, and has the distinct advantage of not requiring batteries.But then you're expected to put a ridiculous, bulky receiver on the body,For "why" you would need to ask Nikon.If the Nikon ML-L7 Bluetooth remote control can work with the Z30, Z5, Z50, Z50 II, Z6 II, Z6 III, Z7 II, Zf, and Zfc, why won't they make it work with the Z8 or Z9?
As for "how", the WR-R11a/WR-T10 set is a remote release with other functionality, such as synchronizing bodies. Snapbridge or NX Tether are also remote release possibilities.
Well, you've got me therewhen it has built-in Bluetooth and WiFi.
The WR-R11a is not bulky. It is by far the smallest device of its type that I know of, and has the distinct advantage of not requiring batteries.But then you're expected to put a ridiculous, bulky receiver on the body,For "why" you would need to ask Nikon.If the Nikon ML-L7 Bluetooth remote control can work with the Z30, Z5, Z50, Z50 II, Z6 II, Z6 III, Z7 II, Zf, and Zfc, why won't they make it work with the Z8 or Z9?
As for "how", the WR-R11a/WR-T10 set is a remote release with other functionality, such as synchronizing bodies. Snapbridge or NX Tether are also remote release possibilities.
Well, you've got me therewhen it has built-in Bluetooth and WiFi.
But it's back to the 'why' question. Only Nikon knows.
If you want to use Bluetooth, Snapbridge. If you prefer WiFi, NX Tether.

Not sure if you're trolling. It weighs 0.6 oz and is tiny, barely over an inch in any dimension. I never notice it. If you do, or think you would, I commend to you a classic tale .Do you really think this big plastic thing attached to your camera isn't bulky and ridiculous?
I have one for a P1000. But yes, I prefer the WR-T10, if only because it is smaller in the pocket.let me tell you I have both and much prefer the WR method.
The ML-L7 is fiddly to use. It appears to need re-paring every time you turn on the camera.
It really isn’t!!The WR-R11a is not bulky. It is by far the smallest device of its type that I know of, and has the distinct advantage of not requiring batteries.But then you're expected to put a ridiculous, bulky receiver on the body,For "why" you would need to ask Nikon.If the Nikon ML-L7 Bluetooth remote control can work with the Z30, Z5, Z50, Z50 II, Z6 II, Z6 III, Z7 II, Zf, and Zfc, why won't they make it work with the Z8 or Z9?
As for "how", the WR-R11a/WR-T10 set is a remote release with other functionality, such as synchronizing bodies. Snapbridge or NX Tether are also remote release possibilities.
Well, you've got me therewhen it has built-in Bluetooth and WiFi.
But it's back to the 'why' question. Only Nikon knows.
If you want to use Bluetooth, Snapbridge. If you prefer WiFi, NX Tether.
Do you really think this big plastic thing attached to your camera isn't bulky and ridiculous?
By the way, what’s your need for a remote? If it’s for landscape or long exp photos, a self timer or exposure delay is all you need.If the Nikon ML-L7 Bluetooth remote control can work with the Z30, Z5, Z50, Z50 II, Z6 II, Z6 III, Z7 II, Zf, and Zfc, why won't they make it work with the Z8 or Z9?
Peter! You're right - the original ML-L7 was horrible! But then I got a couple of these babies and I paired them once in April 2023 and they never needed pairing again. To this day October 2025 they remain paired and work perfectly! Much better tactile response on the buttons too! Highly recommended!let me tell you I have both and much prefer the WR method.
The ML-L7 is fiddly to use. It appears to need re-paring every time you turn on the camera.
I'm with you Blisqua! Let's get a petition going!If the Nikon ML-L7 Bluetooth remote control can work with the Z30, Z5, Z50, Z50 II, Z6 II, Z6 III, Z7 II, Zf, and Zfc, why won't they make it work with the Z8 or Z9?
If the Nikon ML-L7 Bluetooth remote control can work with the Z30, Z5, Z50, Z50 II, Z6 II, Z6 III, Z7 II, Zf, and Zfc, why won't they make it work with the Z8 or Z9?