** LUMIX GX 45 – 175: THE SMOOTH OPERATOR **

Stevie Boy Blue

Senior Member
Messages
2,373
Solutions
2
Reaction score
3,640
Location
Derbyshire, UK


I bought this lens primarily to shoot video coupled with my recently acquired G9 body, but it’s also proving to be very good for still images. In that regard alone, this GX is growing on me more each time I use it. Essentially, users have 45 – 175mm (90 – 350mm EFL) at their disposal, which comes in very handy for shooting many and varied subjects, from wildlife to compressed street and landscape, etc, etc.

For a fly-by-wire mechanism, I’m impressed by how quickly and smoothly the zoom can be moved from wide angle to full telephoto and back again, at least when utilising the front control ring rather than the alternative lever on the lens barrel. It’s almost as responsive as using a fully manual zoom minus the abrupt stop when reaching full extension that we experience with the more conventional design. As it is, once maximum focal length is reached with the power zoom, we can continue to turn the ring as much as we like without effect. To begin with this felt very strange to me, but I soon became accustomed to and began to appreciate the design, not only re the characteristics of operation but the whole package.

Because everything functions internally, there’s no protrusion of the lens barrel from the housing as we zoom to longer focal lengths. A pretty obvious advantage to its compactness is that we can shoot less conspicuously with the GX compared to any standard G-series lens with a similar ranging telescopic type zoom. Take Panasonic’s plastic fantastic and cheap as chips Lumix G 45 – 150mm as an example when out shooting street/people stuff. Say we want to grab a shot of a group of folks having a picnic and we want the scene to appear as natural as possible, eg with no-one looking straight down the lens because they’ve rumbled our poorly executed tactics.

When extending the more obvious telescopic 45 – 150, there’s a much higher chance that we’ll be noticed by at least one person in the group than if we use the internally-extending, much less conspicuous power zoom of the 45 – 175. (See the example shot I’ve included of the group enjoying time together under the tree, plus the older ladies resting on the garden bench as well as the 2 youngsters embracing in the final mono [B & W] image. The point to note is that I was in full view of everyone at the time of shooting, but all remained oblivious to my photographing them because of the internal zoom.) Using the PZ, nothing changes in external appearance. Whether we shoot at 45 or 175mm, the lens remains the same size, which is fairly small for the vast focal range it covers. As I say, that’s just one benefit that the power zoom has over the manual and extending type, be it for stills or video shooting.

On the subject of video, the sheer smoothness of the 45 – 175’s zoom operation is an invaluable asset – at least for me. I often use Bridge cameras in my armory of photo gear, their power zooms on which I rely for smooth looking footage where a transition from wide to telephoto or vice versa is included in the finished article. Well, I can confirm right now, as smooth as my FZ330 and particularly my two FZ2000s are for this type of work, the lens on review here is smoother still across all focal lengths that each set-up shares.

It’s just a shame that this MILC lens is restricted to 90mm EFL at the wider end. If it went to 24-ish mm like my bridge cameras do, they’d already be more or less redundant as video tools in good light. For want of a better analogy, zooming from wide to telephoto and back again with the 45 – 175 PZ is as smooth as putting a sharp knife through warm butter; not the slightest of interruptions, jerkiness, or instability in the process to be found anywhere. I’ve been utterly impressed with both that and the built-in IS – especially coupled with the IBIS included in the G9 body. It’s pretty much all rock steady, making for a largely enjoyable experience across the board.

To conclude, I rate this lens very highly for both video and stills in good light – especially as I bought mine used and in excellent condition for a bargain £110. Hence, I guess one question some readers may ask is: If I had to, would I pay full market RRP of £399ish for a brand new one?

Yes, absolutely I would. Whilst my 45 – 150 and particularly 14 – 140mm ii are each just a tad sharper for stills shooting at any focal lengths and aperture settings they share with the G X 45 – 175, it still renders output that is good enough for me to keep the lens pretty much permanently attached to my G9. Hence, I recommend it to anyone on the lookout for something a little different but largely no less useful than the manually operated type zoom. :-)

Put it this way, I’m far more impressed with results from this lens than I was with either the 45 – 200 mm or 100 – 300mm that I also tried out recently, both of which I returned for full refunds because neither met with my higher standard in Image quality and demands for fine feather and fur detail rendering, as this PZ does. Overall, I find this a more useful and higher performing lens, save to mention that weighing in at just 210g (0.46 lb,) it is by far the lighter of those three options.

And when push comes to shove, isn’t lightening our load a primary reason why many of us choose M4/3rd gear over larger and heavier formats? I know that certainly applies to me – and the lighter and smaller the whole package the better... at least within reason. ;-)

NOTE that the following images have all been resized and/or cropped for fast loading purposes. Otherwise they are Jpegs as they appeared straight from my camera.













































In closing, thanks very much for reading this review. I appreciate your time and I hope you find something useful here. :-)

Best wishes and happy shooting to all.

PS: For anyone interested: Since joining DPR in 2009, I’ve compiled various user-reviews intended to help readers by giving them some insight into my favourite Panasonic products, links for which are supplied below. Please note that I use my time freely and completely absent of remuneration or freebie goods from anyone or any company. If a product impresses me enough, I enjoy spreading the word. I speak as I find and I just happen to like Panasonic cameras and lenses more than any other makes. That’s why I buy and recommend them – nothing more, nothing less.

Lumix G100 Camera: https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/65550733

Panasonic 25mm F1.7 lens: https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/66591863

Panasonic 42.5mm F1.7 lens: https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4665967

Panasonic 14-140mm ii lens: https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/65695092

FZ2000 Review Part 1: https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/64288303

FZ2000 Review Part 2: https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/66360652

FZ300 Review Part 1: https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/63244070

FZ300 Review Part 2: https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/65012028

Cheers...
 

Attachments

  • 4353613.jpg
    4353613.jpg
    985 KB · Views: 1
  • 4353602.jpg
    4353602.jpg
    811.7 KB · Views: 0
  • 4353603.jpg
    4353603.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 0
  • 4353604.jpg
    4353604.jpg
    1.9 MB · Views: 0
  • 4353605.jpg
    4353605.jpg
    1.4 MB · Views: 0
  • 4353606.jpg
    4353606.jpg
    1.5 MB · Views: 0
  • 4353608.jpg
    4353608.jpg
    912.1 KB · Views: 0
  • 4353609.jpg
    4353609.jpg
    922.1 KB · Views: 0
  • 4353610.jpg
    4353610.jpg
    1.6 MB · Views: 0
  • 4353611.jpg
    4353611.jpg
    1.2 MB · Views: 0
  • 4353612.jpg
    4353612.jpg
    884.2 KB · Views: 0
Thanks for the very useful review. I also have this lens and fully appreciate it.

I have often seen it panned because of its power zoom. This seems ridiculous as although it has power zoom this can be ignored completely as you have noted and the manual fly by wire zoom works perfectly.

Of course we can always use the power zoom should it be desirable.

One extra benefit I should mention is that the lens can be set to start at a given zoom lens - there are situations where it is very useful for the last zoomed position to be remembered.

It is a very sharp lens as well. It also is a good companion to its somewhat larger and and faster sibling - the 35-100/2.8. Which is also internal focus and zoom.
Thank you, Tom.

You are very welcome to my having reviewed this lens. I’m pleased to note that you like it, too. :-)

I hadn’t really considered the zoom-resume aspects of it. I have various bridge cameras with this facility included but have never found a need for it. That’s not to say I and others wouldn’t find it useful re the GX PZ occasionally, though, so thanks for highlighting it here.

I also agree that this is sharp lens, and I also appreciate your additional info re the 35-100. ;-)

Cheers...
 
Hello Stevie,

thank you for the detailed and nice review with the great as always pictures you shared. Makes visiting this forum a pleasure to read specially your write ups. Enjoy the lens, maybe I will get one too one day. Tell me how do you see the increase in IQ from, lets say your trusty FZ2000/2500?
Greetings and take care!
 
I just looked at some of your photos via the link. Some nice results there; I especially like the wasps examples. Thanks for posting. :-)

Cheers...
 
Thank you for reviewing the lens! It is on my watchlist.

Question though: Did you do some panning video's with the lens? How about jittering or counterproductive the IS can be, because it is stabilizing in all direction where you don't want to stabilize in the direction you are panning.
 
I bookmarked your page for future inspiration. You are an excellent photographer, and the 45-175 shows very well in your skillful hands.
 
Could you tell me how to interrupt these charts?
The charts show the lens resolution across the frame for the single copy of each that was tested. Bright green is good, yellow is weak, orange is poor and red is terrible.

Some of the charts look a bit odd to me.

Andrew
 
Hello Stevie,

thank you for the detailed and nice review with the great as always pictures you shared.
You're welcome, Cruisin'. Thanks.
Makes visiting this forum a pleasure to read specially your write ups.
Great to know that my efforts enhance your visits here. I really appreciate your acknowledgment. :-)
Enjoy the lens, maybe I will get one too one day. Tell me how do you see the increase in IQ from, lets say your trusty FZ2000/2500?
Greetings and take care!
If you shoot just video or both video and stills, you’re almost sure to benefit from owning this lens. For stills only, perhaps not so much. Straight out of camera, your 14-140mm is the sharper option, as is the 45 – 150 cheap-as-chips Lumix lens.

For stills, my FZ2000 has the sharpest ‘zoom’ output from any camera I own - period. Its 24-480mm EFL lens is a marvellous feat of design and engineering as far as I’m concerned. It saves me from even considering the PL 50 – 200 F2.8-F4, which is pricier and heavier combined with any M4/3 body akin to the FZ2000 in overall size.

As I said in the OP, I bought the GX PZ 45-175 primarily for video. Compared to my FZ2000, the GX PZ affords me the advantage of shooting 4K on a M4/3rd sensor, whereas the bridge camera is cropped from a smaller 1-inch version. It’s not that I don’t appreciate the FZ2000’s excellent video quality. But I suspect that once I get around to trying things out, the GX/G9 combo will afford less noisy footage shot in low light.

In any head-to head re stills at their longest focal lengths, the FZ2000 affords more reach and a faster wide open aperture of F4.5 compared to the GX’s F5.6. At F4.5, the FZ is tack sharp whilst, although good at F5.6, the GX PZ benefits from stopping down to at least F6.3 for sharper results. Hence it’s all about balancing the effects of noise associated with using different sizes apertures on different size sensors.

In medium to good light and up to ISO 1600, if I can handle it on the day, my first choice would always be the FZ2000 but the GX PZ/G9 combo is less noisy up to ISO 3200, so it’s horses for courses. Either way, the FZ2000 offers more variety in focal length both at the wider and longer ends, making it the more versatile and convenient option overall. As I say, the FZ is the sharpest of all zoom glass that I own, but that makes the GX PZ no less convenient for photographing anything and everything when it’s all I’m carrying at the time.

Just for you, I’ve prepared the following examples of two robins shot from roughly the same distance, one from the FZ2000, the other the GX PZ on my G9. Yes, light levels are slightly different in both, as are ISO settings between them. But overall, I’d say they illustrate the points I mentioned above fairly well, perhaps most noticeably in the 100% crops. :-)









Hope this helps. Thanks again for the complimentary post.

Cheers...
 

Attachments

  • 4354821.jpg
    4354821.jpg
    756.8 KB · Views: 0
  • 4354822.jpg
    4354822.jpg
    843.6 KB · Views: 0
  • 4354823.jpg
    4354823.jpg
    1.8 MB · Views: 0
  • 4354824.jpg
    4354824.jpg
    1.9 MB · Views: 0
Last edited:
Thank you for reviewing the lens! It is on my watchlist.
You're welcome. Thank you
Question though: Did you do some panning video's with the lens? How about jittering or counterproductive the IS can be, because it is stabilizing in all direction where you don't want to stabilize in the direction you are panning.
No, not tried panning myself. Perhaps there are some examples on YouTube or somewhere? Searching via Google may help you.

Cheers...
 
Last edited:
Great detailed comparison and explanation Stevie! Thank you that and sharing the pics the pics for me, much appreciated. Like you say every piece of gear has it's use and it is great to have the options.

Take care and greetings to you!
 
Great detailed comparison and explanation Stevie! Thank you that and sharing the pics the pics for me, much appreciated. Like you say every piece of gear has it's use and it is great to have the options.

Take care and greetings to you!
You’re welcome, Cruisin’.

I’ m happy to be of service to some degree, as I like helping folks where I can. :-)

Have fun.
 
Thank you for the compliment, Steve, and it's always fun to see a thread by you, we seem to share a few things in common, too!
You're welcome. I'm always up for giving credit where it's due. :-)

Good to know that you find my threads fun and that we share a few things in common.

Keep up the good work.

Regards,

Steve
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top