Looking for a Lightroom-style macOS photo editor with no subscription

Where did you get $150 from? I paid $69.99 for a lifetime license on sale. Now that Apple owns the app I don't know is there be another BF sale. Regular price is now $119 for a LT license.
Small correction: looks like you're talking about Photomator, which has been an Apple app for quite a while. Apple just bought Pixelmator (perpetual license), which is more of a PS alternative while Photomator (subscription) is more of a LR alternative.
 
Last edited:
Where did you get $150 from? I paid $69.99 for a lifetime license on sale. Now that Apple owns the app I don't know is there be another BF sale. Regular price is now $119 for a LT license.
Small correction: looks like you're talking about Photomator, which has been an Apple app for quite a while. Apple just bought Pixelmator (perpetual license), which is more of a PS alternative while Photomator (subscription) is more of a LR alternative.
Nope. Not sure where you get your info, but...you are conflating and confusing the name of the Company, Pixelmator, with the name of the app...

Apple officially acquired Photomator along with the rest of the Pixelmator suite on February 11, 2025. See: Apple Acquires Photo Editing App Maker Pixelmator

"Apple has reached an agreement to acquire Pixelmator, the company behind popular photo and image editing apps Pixelmator Pro, Pixelmator for iOS, and Photomator. The acquisition is subject to regulatory approval, according to an announcement made by the Pixelmator team on Friday."

"Pixelmator last year announced that it was being acquired by Apple, and today the company confirmed that the acquisition has been completed after Apple received regulatory approval. The Pixelmator for iOS, Pixelmator Pro, and Photomator apps were today updated with a new splash screen announcing the deal." - Tuesday February 11, 2025 SOURCE: Apple Completes Pixelmator Acquisition

--
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
"A photograph is a secret about a secret. The more it tells you the less you know." - Diane Arbus
 
Last edited:
I have not tried all in your above list however, my choice of photoediting sotware which works for me is a combination of a RAW developer DxO elite and then exporting (opening) the finished developed RAW image into a pixel editing app of Affinty. [IF needed]

DxO Photolab is Pricey at $230 but non-subscription and worth it (IMO).
DXO has a sale every November when they offer big discounts. After that they offer a special upgrade price during the November sale for less than $100.
 
Hi everyone!

I’m looking for a photo editor for macOS that works similarly to Lightroom, but without a subscription — just a one-time purchase.

I’m not a pro photographer — I’m a dentist — and I mostly edit:

- dental clinical photos,
- portraits,
- and some macro photography (focus stacking would be a big plus, but not essential).

I usually use basic tools like:
- white balance,
- exposure,
- shadows/highlights,
- HSL,
- linear gradients,
- and local adjustments.

So far I’ve tried or considered:

- **Luminar Neo** – seems OK, but AI features expire after a year unless I renew.
- **Photomator** – good UX but quite expensive ($150) for my low-volume use.
- **Capture One** – too expensive for what I need.
- **Darktable** – great features but overwhelming and complex.
- **RawTherapee** – no linear gradient support.
- **Affinity / Pixelmator Pro** – great apps, but more like Photoshop.
- **ON1 Photo RAW** – looks promising, but I’m not sure about real-life performance.

Any suggestions? I’d love something simple, intuitive, affordable, and macOS-native.

Thanks so much in advance!
Check out Hasselblad Phocus. Does not support all features on non-Hasselblad raw files but most of COne or LR features are available. And it is for nothing/zero/nada/free. Thanks to Hasselblad for that offer!!!

--
some lenses - some bodies
 
Last edited:
Here are the actual capabilities/specs/limitations by using 3rd party raw files.

Be aware that most capabilities are only present in Mac Systems and read to the end of the citation from Hasselblad.

<<snip:

Phocus primarily fully supports Hasselblad 3FR and 3F files with more limited support for other format files.


The Mac platform allows file viewing and limited editing of not only TIFF, JPEG, DNG and PNG files for example,but also more than 150 third-party digital cameras, including
- Canon
- Nikon
- Leaf
- Leica
- Sony
- Fuji
- Olympus

The Windows platform supports TIFF and JPEG files.

Hasselblad raw files can also be processed with other selected software applications, namely, Adobe Camera Raw / Lightroom and Apple Aperture. Note, however, that using Phocus is the most comprehensive method.

The Phocus and Adobe methods can produce almost identical results (in most cases) regarding RAW conversion so it is a matter of personal choice regarding which method would best suit your preferred workflow. Alternatively you can use Apple Aperture [this is partially an old text which was just amended without taking care of actual app :-)) ] though you should take note that the benefits of DAC and HNCS etc, will be lost in this case. Please check the Phocus Read-Me and our web page for updated information.

(...)

MP4: MP4 video files can be previewed in the viewer.
3FV: RAW video files (H6D-50c and H6D-100c) can be exported to Cinema DNG or Apple ProRes.

To sum up, capture files can be stored as 3FR files (from a CF card) for later processing in Phocus or other software, or they can be stored as 3F files (as a result of tethered shooting or 3FR files processed and converted in Phocus). In all cases if you keep the original 3FR/3F files, you will also retain the possibility of reprocessing them in the future in later versions of Phocus or other software to take advantage of eventual improvements and developments.

Other (Mac only): This group comprises a list of various formats, both raw andnon-raw, proprietary and general. These files are initially read and processed via the integral Macintosh OS X support before they are adopted by Phocus. This means the contents of a folder containing a mix of image-format files can be viewed in its entirety in Phocus.
As these files can contain data that is written differently to Hasselblad files, there can therefore be a restriction on the effect that tools in Phocus could have.
In practice this means you should expect the following tools to be inactive:
- Highlight recovery
- Shadow fill
- Clarity
- Lens corrections
- Noise reduction
- Scene calibration.

However, other tools can be freely used and in order to retain the adjustments, so called sidecar files are created. These are separate files that contain the necessary data that any following application needs to reconstruct the image the way you intended in Phocus. The files use the same name or designation that the original raw file had but to distinguish them from the originals, the sidecar files acquire a new suffix: .phos.
These sidecar files are automatically stored in the same folder as the original files. The important point to remember here is that when transferring any non-Hasselblad files that have been adjusted in Phocus to another folder, to another computer or to an external storage medium, you must remember to include the sidecar files too. Otherwise all the changes and corrections you made in Phocus will be lost until you re-unite them. When moving or copying files inside Phocus, however, the sidecar files are automatically copied with the raw file.
Be aware that initial previews of third party raw files might reflect the consequences of processing according to the manufacturer's standards. This would be particularly noticeable in regard to curve and color renditions.
So, for every adjusted or exported file, Phocus creates and stores individual preview files in the Preview Cache folder that resides in the Phocus Application support folder.
Though not necessarily normal workflow practice, adjustments can also be made on non-raw files if desired.

:snap>>
 
I advise you to steer clear of ON1 Photo Raw for Mac. Especially if you are a casual photographer who cannot devote days to understanding all the hidden folders and hidden compressed catalog files and added thumbnail file of each photo with ON1 creates.

I saw your post when I came here looking for a thread on how to completely uninstall this software from my Mac and never have anything to do with it ever again.

I tried ON1 Photo Raw 2023 on an M2 Mac PowerBook with 1 TB hard drive for the very same reason you mention. I wanted something other than MacOS Photos to catalog and filter my 40,000+ photos and allow me many options to enter my own comments and ratings.

First: the program may be unresponsive and spin and spin not responding for HOURS. And the problems I experienced with browsing tens of thousands of photos are not limited to Mac users or to Windows users with underpowered graphics cards., however I suspect the Mac version is far more glitchy than the Windows version. For one example of a high-powered Windows user with some of the same problems I see on my high-end Mac, see comment at far end of this thread by user eurgain In reply to MissErmelyn • Aug 15, 2023:

https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4701128#forum-post-66902371.

Re: ON1 Raw 2023 - very slow browsing since recent update

"I have exactly the same problem on one of my computers - a Dell laptop with a Core i9 processor and NVidia GTX1050ti graphics with 32GBytes of RAM - so not an underpowered machine. ON1 takes up 50% total processor time spread over all 12 cores". Alistair

Second: it used 2.5 x more hard drive space (over 500MB) to store the same 40,000 photos that MacOS photos used only 200MB to store. Within six months of buying a laptop with a 1 TB hard drive, ON1 Photo RAW completely filled my hard drive and it would have kept going if it didn't run out of room. Since MacOS Photos and ON1 Photo RAW cannot both read and share the same compressed file (library), I went to considerable trouble to export my MacOS photos as individual uncompressed files. I had to remove the 200MB Photos library and I still have less than 40MB free space left on my computer. I cannot download any of my pics taken for the past year onto my Mac without ON1 Photo RAW gobbling up what little is left of my 1 TB drive. ON1 claims they don't use a compressed library like other programs, but based on what I could figure out they store a full size individual photo and they have a hidden compressed library they don't tell you about and they store a thumbnail for "fast viewing" (fast viewing of RAW that is ...) which it would seem are almost as large by default as some of my older image files that are not RAW.

Third: the 2023 software is very glitchy in ways that Windows users might or might not experience.

Comments or keywords I entered are almost certain to disappear and not be saved if I don't click in another field before I shift to the next photo. Comments I entered days ago may also unpredictably disappear when I go to the next photo if I happened to click in description field in hopes this means it will save the keywords I just entered in THAT field. This is not consistent - after I've gone three times through 1,000 to 2,000 photos, when my text disappears immediately and when it saves and when it disappears later simply cycling through photos I already reviewed i pretty much unpredictable. This is completely unacceptable in software that's been around in some form for almost a decade already.

Fourth: When the defaults mess up your computer, figuring out the solution became Ransomware around same time (2023). Support instructions directed me to ON1 forums to help understand the complexities and consequences that are not clearly explained when was presented choices of default settings at startup. If I wanted to access ON1 forums to back up and reinstall and/or understand the complexities of the hidden compressed library and to reverse to undo the HUGE thumbnails created by default, ON1 required me to pony up more money for a PLUS subscription.

I could go on and on with additional headaches with ON1 Photo RAW, but these four failures are more than enough. Now I simply need to learn how to remove every trace of this ON1 software and associated hidden files/libraries from my Mac and never deal with it ever again
 
**ON1 Photo RAW** – looks promising, but I’m not sure about real-life performance.
What does performance mean in this context? What are you unsure about?
Photo RAW struggles to rapidly import, catalog, index and/or display photo files, where Photos does not face similar delays importing or opening photo files. If ON1 Photo RAW struggles with my "Fine" quality 2 to 5 MB JPGs, I hate to imagine how it struggles with 20+ MB RAW files.

At any given time, I may open ON1 Photo RAW and face a spinning wheel because it's indexing or processing photos. It essentially freezes up ON1 photo RAW in that it makes buttons and controls totally unresponsive - sometimes for minutes, sometimes for hours. I re-opened it to import vacation photos after not using it for most of a year and first thing that happens is I'm again immediately faced with almost totally unresponsive software. After reviewing and working with thousands of newly-taken photos the past two-and-a-half years, I still never know when it's going to work rapidly or when it's going to freeze for seconds, minutes or hours.

ON1 stores three versions of each photo before you even start to edit. With painful hindsight this duplication seems to be some kind of clumsy back-end work-around designed to compensate for poor performance ( = speed importing, indexing and displaying photos). Nowhere on website, in free tutorial videos, or during the install process does ON1 explain up front that they store three versions of everything 1) full-size original photo as an individual file, AND a second copy as part of a compressed library, AND a third as a thumbnail. As far as I know, MacOS Photos simply stores one original in the compressed library with comparatively excellent speed/performance opening and displaying photo (even with tens of thousands of pics in the library). Until you make edits anyway. The ON1 Photo RAW thumbnails can be quite large if you choose to accept the default "recommended" size = Large during first five minutes of initial software set-up. If you change your mind later, ON1 Photo support told me my only choice was to completely uninstall the ON1 software and completely reinstall, this time choosing a smaller default thumbnail size on the second go-round. You can't change your mind later and simply change the thumbnail size for the photos you already imported. Uggh.

Experience with speed/performance of ON1 seems to vary widely from one user to another. Users experiencing problems performance/speed problems include powerful Windows laptops with powerful Nvidia video cards as well as users of Macs and users of older Windows machines or computers with under-powered video cards. Other threads suggest some of these speed/performance problems became MUCH worse beginning with the 2023 version I purchased two years ago.
 
Also read here a long and various list of strange behaviors in the 2023 5 version of ON1

https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/66632813

The original poster had used ON1 Photo RAW since 2017 and was deeply disturbed by the problems he encountered starting with ON1 Photo RAW version 2023 such as inexplicably moving or deleting an entire folder of photos he was working on. I certainly wish I read this thread before I bought and installed the same version 2023 5. More than a year later I got offers from ON1 Photo RAW to upgrade to their newer 2024 version, so I looked for signs the problems I encountered had since been fixed in the upgrade. Nope. The comments I read in 2024 suggested to me ON1 focused on enhancing some AI tools and added new features without doing anything to address either the glitchiness or the slowness/performance issues of ON1 Photo RAW 2023.
 
Additional performance issues reported by long-term ON1 users who are both abandoning Photo RAW. Two more threads which say the most recent versions of ON1 Photo RAW have a lot of problems that don't necessarily have to do with large photo catalogs. The second is a Mac user like the original poster and myself. Both these users contacted tech support without resolution in the past three months.

https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/68071914

3 months ago long term ON1 user Malathan wrote:

i went back to On1 as I am most comfortable with it. However...after another slew of issues and bugs, their latest 2025.1 having major demosaic issues with magenta (showing up in aquarium photos), yet no issue in LRC and Affinity, and after a lengthy step-by-step support case I submitted on what I had tried to resolve (drivers, reboot, various tests, ...) On1 support as usual immediately closed my case without communication (I think I am on their black list apparently). In the end, time to rip the bandaid off and revisit other apps.

https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/68245312

3 months ago Mac user Adam2 wrote of Photo Raw/PR vs Lightroom/LR:

"Quite candidly, PR has fallen far behind LR and the lack of performance, quality, and features has forced me back into the Adobe fold. I'l no longer be renewing my On1 Plus membership this fall. It's ironic, because I've been with On1 for well over 12 years (before Photo RAW) and abandoned LR sometime after LR 6 because of I was tired of all of the crashes in the cataloging system and PR offered masking and features not available in LR at the time."

and

"FWIW, the program has been crashing and hanging repeatedly since the new OS update, Sequoia 15.4.1. I've sent tech support more evidence. Simply opening up browse, or trying to apply noise reduction results in the spinning wheel requiring a force close. I've tried emptying cache, performing the reset, rebooting the whole system, but it hasn't been working. Just about to uninstall and ask for a refund."
 
Hi everyone!

I’m looking for a photo editor for macOS that works similarly to Lightroom, but without a subscription — just a one-time purchase.

I’m not a pro photographer — I’m a dentist — and I mostly edit:

- dental clinical photos,
- portraits,
- and some macro photography (focus stacking would be a big plus, but not essential).

I usually use basic tools like:
- white balance,
- exposure,
- shadows/highlights,
- HSL,
- linear gradients,
- and local adjustments.

So far I’ve tried or considered:

- **Luminar Neo** – seems OK, but AI features expire after a year unless I renew.
- **Photomator** – good UX but quite expensive ($150) for my low-volume use.
- **Capture One** – too expensive for what I need.
- **Darktable** – great features but overwhelming and complex.
- **RawTherapee** – no linear gradient support.
- **Affinity / Pixelmator Pro** – great apps, but more like Photoshop.
- **ON1 Photo RAW** – looks promising, but I’m not sure about real-life performance.

Any suggestions? I’d love something simple, intuitive, affordable, and macOS-native.

Thanks so much in advance!
There's a very new FOSS Lightroom alternative called RapidRAW:


It is not as deep yet, but was developed in just two weeks, so I have high hopes that it will only get much better with a little time.
 
[No message]
 
There's a very new FOSS Lightroom alternative called RapidRAW:

https://github.com/CyberTimon/RapidRAW

It is not as deep yet, but was developed in just two weeks, so I have high hopes that it will only get much better with a little time.
While I am "not looking", I am intrigued.

I have an older WIn 10 machine (or at least most of it) just sitting . I might just download this and explore it.

Question - what are the GPU requirements.

I like the idea of using AI to develop code, if I understood correctly. . That can really speed up development and testing.
 
Wow - you've been a member here for nearly a year, apparently never posting a thing until now: four long comments about your issues with ON1 Photo RAW running on a Mac. They're wildly different from my personal experience with v2025, but they're sad stories and I feel for you. You clearly should switch to some other software or a Windows machine.
 
Last edited:
Wow - you've been a member here for nearly a year, apparently never posting a thing until now: four long comments about your issues with ON1 Photo RAW running on a Mac. They're wildly different from my personal experience with v2025, but they're sad stories and I feel for you. You clearly should switch to some other software or a Windows machine.
Your advice should be "AND" -- new software AND a Windows machine.

This is based on what he said/wrote. For those of you with no issues, good - you don't need that advice.
 
Wow - you've been a member here for nearly a year, apparently never posting a thing until now: four long comments about your issues with ON1 Photo RAW running on a Mac. They're wildly different from my personal experience with v2025, but they're sad stories and I feel for you. You clearly should switch to some other software or a Windows machine.
Your advice should be "AND" -- new software AND a Windows machine.
He only really knows what he experienced with his ' M2 Mac PowerBook with 1 TB hard drive' and mostly with an old 2023 version of the software.
This is based on what he said/wrote.
He can't write anything personally about Windows, just copy complaints from others.

He did say '... the 2023 software is very glitchy in ways that Windows users might or might not experience.' This is the middle of 2025, and I know of no serious Windows or Mac bugs in the current version as long as the hardware is adequate for the job. For sure there are some poorly implemented new features, but that's a different thing.

Some slowness issues might be solvable by changing some of Photo RAW's preferences. Have they been optimized by all users? Probably not.

He also focuses heavily on catalog problems. If they exist, I'll never see them because I don't use the catalog for anything. Nor do I use the DxO PhotoLab database. I don't trust either of them. I use a robust purpose-built DAM designed with the kind of attention needed to safeguard what it does.
For those of you with no issues, good - you don't need that advice.
The software world is full of bad experiences that are far from universal.
 
Last edited:
I use a robust purpose-built DAM designed with the kind of attention needed to safeguard what it does.
Digital Asset Management. How do you use that to catalog your photos. What DAM program do you use?
 
I use a robust purpose-built DAM designed with the kind of attention needed to safeguard what it does.
Digital Asset Management. How do you use that to catalog your photos.
I point it to the permanent collection on my NAS (about 90,000 photos and 1800 videos). It examines every file and stores everything it knows about them in its local database. It automatically creates numerous categories based on characteristics of the files so they can be logically (not physically) grouped according to those characteristics. I can create my own categories, of course, based on anything I want.

I apply descriptive keywords to every file, either manually or with AI analysis, that can be searched in any combination.

I apply face recognition, which allows further logical grouping by persons.

These are things that many DAMs can be expected to do, but it's important that they be done well and reliably. While I was typing this, it ran its own periodic diagnosis to ensure that the database is healthy.

8244211266da407a87ccc77452bc53eb.jpg
What DAM program do you use?
IMatch. (It's Windows only.)
 
Thank You.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top