Lightweight zoom vs prime for A7CR

Sony’s 28-60/4.0-5.6 is compact and sharp across the frame at f5.6-f8. Great for scenic shots in decent light. As it’s a bundled kit lens, used ones in excellent shape are available for half the new retail price. I got mine for around $250.
Adam-T of this forum talked me into getting this lens, & I'm grateful he did. It's so portable, compact, & light, & I'm loving its IQ on my a7rV.

It does have 2 quirks: the lens cap isn't the most secure, at least mine isn't. I lost a cap two days after getting the lens, & have to be extra careful with the replacement. The other quirk is the lens rotation mechanism has a detent that you have to turn past before the lens operates. IOW, you twist the lens past a "bump" to turn it on. That bothers some people, though I haven't the slightest idea why. It's mindless to do & only takes a split second.

I got mine from MPB for $219. It was a "Good" condition lens, & I was pleasantly surprised with how nice their "Good" lenses can be. Very securely packed too.

The 28-60mm certainly would be a great option to have in your lens line up for times when you want lightness & portability without the limits of a fixed focal length.
Hi,

The lens cap issue - 40.5 mm caps, filters and accessories are a pain.... It's not a size shared by any other Sony lens, it's fiddly for big hands, stores don't stock them, and some filters aren't even made in that size.

I bought a 40.5 - 52mm step-up ring. They're very inexpensive from the wonderful Chinese accessory industry. I leave it on the lens all the time and use a 52mm cap and accessories. Its outer diameter is almost identical in size to the diameter of the telescoping barrel section and it doesn't interfere with retraction. You can get anything and everything in 52mm. It just works.

Cheers, Rod
Very neat.

Thanks Rod.
 


Hi - I just saw your gear list and you already have 35mm lenses, so I need not comment, and I removed my photographs.
 

Attachments

  • a5e6c822bb2649c08f3dc85144193152.jpg
    a5e6c822bb2649c08f3dc85144193152.jpg
    721 KB · Views: 0
  • eb6919acc04449e9901d5e9bb4ea745a.jpg
    eb6919acc04449e9901d5e9bb4ea745a.jpg
    806 KB · Views: 0
  • 15c3ebb965d94e97be22be60886666d9.jpg
    15c3ebb965d94e97be22be60886666d9.jpg
    1.7 MB · Views: 0
  • 6e0a6af8fa734fd496416e5fda80f9c6.jpg
    6e0a6af8fa734fd496416e5fda80f9c6.jpg
    885.2 KB · Views: 0
  • c2b3892f5dda46e295504f83d13dda61.jpg
    c2b3892f5dda46e295504f83d13dda61.jpg
    5.6 MB · Views: 0
  • a49c5d0866954f8c98af30204202c0cb.jpg
    a49c5d0866954f8c98af30204202c0cb.jpg
    1 MB · Views: 0
  • 708f6b2e040545f9bcc403e6f32dda29.jpg
    708f6b2e040545f9bcc403e6f32dda29.jpg
    813.1 KB · Views: 0
  • cf2182ff234645a296c0f6ca2df28761.jpg
    cf2182ff234645a296c0f6ca2df28761.jpg
    2.4 MB · Views: 0
  • 9712b9cbb4cc4fae9cffbebe418aef70.jpg
    9712b9cbb4cc4fae9cffbebe418aef70.jpg
    4.5 MB · Views: 0
  • 689656a1eb464e3ebe1704b38dfa3be9.jpg
    689656a1eb464e3ebe1704b38dfa3be9.jpg
    3.5 MB · Views: 0
  • ae479f8d8dbb4a2ba393d6131a70d1ae.jpg
    ae479f8d8dbb4a2ba393d6131a70d1ae.jpg
    2.6 MB · Views: 0
  • 759e6bde11c943afa5bd790d53642a44.jpg
    759e6bde11c943afa5bd790d53642a44.jpg
    1 MB · Views: 0
  • cd82ec2aa4e5401ab1637af80518c5f7.jpg
    cd82ec2aa4e5401ab1637af80518c5f7.jpg
    817.1 KB · Views: 0
  • 68cb80941e0642058a307c6a559ec323.jpg
    68cb80941e0642058a307c6a559ec323.jpg
    1.9 MB · Views: 0
Last edited:
Some food for thought: with a high-resolution camera like the A7CR you don't really need a short zoom -- just use a prime and either crop in or take a step back. If you're looking for sharpness, lightweight and reasonable cost, seems like the tiny Zeiss 35mm f/2.8 might just become your new best friend! Reviewed here.
 
Some food for thought: with a high-resolution camera like the A7CR you don't really need a short zoom -- just use a prime and either crop in or take a step back. If you're looking for sharpness, lightweight and reasonable cost, seems like the tiny Zeiss 35mm f/2.8
or Samyang's much cheaper AF 35/2.8, which is a tad sharper
might just become your new best friend! Reviewed here.
Sony's 28-60 seems like a pretty limited zoom range. But, 28-90 on a high-rez body doesn't seem so bad. Plus, it's small, light, affordable, and pretty darn sharp.

--
Event professional for 20+ years, travel & landscape enthusiast for 30+.
http://jacquescornell.photography
http://happening.photos
 
Last edited:

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top