eruditass
Senior Member
The only sensible post here
That is a waste of money, you'll need longer, heavier, more expensive glass and the only benefit in IQ is in very high ISO, sure you could get a few mm wider at the ultra wide end but then taking a couple of steps back would give you a similar result in APS-C.That is gadgetry. Does not help image quality. A better "feature" would be a full frame sensor.
A better feature would be a faster SR system and Predictive AF, the IQ is just fine except for the extreme and the better AF system will mean getting the shot instead of a high quality missed image.
--Nikon can do it - surely Pentax will match them in the next camera release.
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0908/09080402nikons1000pj.asp
Yeah, I know I've been cynical about other "wishlist" posts, but I think this one has as much chance of materialising as the other wishlists.
--
Mike . Sydney, Australia
http://www.pbase.com/mikeaus/galleries
http://s23.photobucket.com/albums/b356/MikeAus/?
Mike from Canada
'I like to think so far outside the box that it would require a telephoto lens just to see the box!' ~ 'My Quote'
![]()
http://www.airliners.net/search/photo.search?sort_order=views%20DESC&first_this_page=0&page_limit=180&&emailsearch=mighty_mike88%40hotmail.com&thumbnails=