With digital, I perceive the RAW digital file to be what is
valuable. The print, on the other hand, is expendable. I say this
because if the print fades or is damaged--or if I just want another
one in a different size or crop, I just go to my computer and make
another one. No big deal (except a small cost in ink and paper),
and the new prints always come out looking pristine and identical
to the original. What does this mean? Well it means that I now
mount my digital pictures almost opposite from the way I mount
traditional photos. This is because I no longer worry much at all
about making sure photo is archivally protected, but worry only
about displaying it with maximized artistic impact to the viewer.
First, I never use glass. To me, glass mutes colors, can introduce
glare (unless you use expensive non-glare glass), and places a
barrier between the viewer and the photo. I also do not sink the
photo behind a mat anymore (which is really more a measure to keep
traditional photos from touching the glass than being the best
aesthetic device). Instead, I mount the photo on a beveled mat
that sits on
top of the backing such that it projects
out from
the frame. This pushes the photo
toward the viewer. And because
there is no glass, all the vibrancy of the print is retained.
I also construct the mount in such a way that it is easy to replace
the print (either with a new copy of the same print or a new
picture altogether). If the picture fades or gets too dusty or
damaged in any way, I just print a new one and mount it on the same
frame.
Dave
With all of the wonderful pictures the folks in this forum are
always showing, I have to ask how everyone displays printed
pictures around your home?
do you mount all pics?
frame them?
matt them?
I'm looking for a creative way to start displaying more of my
pictures without the expense and time of framing each one.
I'm not worried as much about picture preservation (cheap and easy
to print them again if necessary

) as I am having an
attractive yet easy way to display all the good ones!
any ideas?
--
regards -- jay levy